Incentive Spirometry and Upper Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery

October 19, 2021 updated by: Riphah International University

Compare the Effects of Volume-oriented Versus Flow-oriented Incentive Spirometry on Pulmonary Function and Functional Capacity in Patients of Upper Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery

To compare the effects of volume-oriented versus flow-oriented incentive spirometry on pulmonary function tests and functional capacity in patients of upper abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Previous studies were designed to target only spirometer without focusing on its different types and their effects. This study covers the research gap and therefore is designed to observe effects of different types of spirometer on pulmonary function of patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The volume oriented incentive spirometer enables the patient to inhale air through a mouthpiece and corrugated tubing which is attached to a plastic bellows. The volume of air displaced is indicated on a scale located on the device enclosure. After the patient has achieved the maximum volume, the individual is instructed to hold this volume constant for 3 to 5 seconds.

Studies suggest a physiologically significant difference in the effect of the flow- and volume-oriented incentive spirometer. Flow-oriented devices enforce more work of breathing and increase muscular activity of the upper chest. Volume-oriented devices enforce less work of breathing and improve diaphragmatic activity.

Research was carried out a study on two experimental groups of patients in order to evaluate the effects of aerobic exercise training and incentive spirometry in controlling pulmonary complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, results indicated a significant reduction in heart rate, Oxygen Saturation of hemoglobin (SaO2), and inspiratory capacity for both groups. The researchers concluded that aerobic exercise and incentive spirometry were beneficial in reducing the postoperative pulmonary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Another study observed the comparative study on the effect of preoperative and postoperative incentive spirometry on the pulmonary function of fifty patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The authors concluded that pulmonary function is well-preserved with preoperative than postoperative incentive spirometry.

Another study observed that the volume incentive spirometry resulted in early recovery of both pulmonary function and diaphragm movement in patients who undergone laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 46000
        • Railway General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with upper abdominal surgery (laparoscopy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had undergone open abdominal surgery and laparoscopic obstetrics and gynecological surgery.
  • Patients with unstable hemodynamic parameters (arterial pressure<100 mmHg systolic and <60 mmHg for diastolic and mean arterial Pressure (MAP) <80mmHg.
  • Patients with postoperative complications requiring mechanical ventilation.
  • Uncooperative patients or patients unable to understand or to use the device properly
  • Recent history of lower extremity fracture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Volume-oriented incentive spirometry
Postoperative Volume oriented incentive spirometry 3 times a day
3 sets of 5 repeated deep breaths using volume oriented incentive spirometry 3 times a day for 2 days
EXPERIMENTAL: Flow-oriented incentive spirometry
Postoperative Flow oriented incentive spirometry 3 times a day
3 sets of 5 repeated deep breaths using flow oriented incentive spirometry 3 times a day for 2 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Capacity
Time Frame: 2 days
The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a submaximal exercise test for evaluating physical functional capacity. Six meter walk distance ranges from 400 to 700 meter in normal individuals
2 days
Total Lung Capacity
Time Frame: 2 days
Changes from the baseline will be measured on daily basis. Pulmonary function test will be measured by using a digital spirometer. Spirometry assesses the integrated mechanical function of the lung, chest wall, respiratory muscles, and airways by measuring the total volume of air exhaled from a full lung total lung capacity [TLC] TLC has a normal value ranges from 80% to 120%, of the predicted ratio.
2 days
Forced vital capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: 2 days
Changes from the baseline will be measured on daily basis. Pulmonary function test will be measured by using a digital spirometer. FVC is the total volume of air that can be exhaled during a maximally forced expiration effort. It ranges from 80% to 120% of the predicted value.
2 days
Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)
Time Frame: 2 days
FEV1 is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out in the first 1 second, after full inspiration. Average values for FEV1 in healthy people depend mainly on sex and age. Values of between 80% and 120% of the average value are considered normal.
2 days
FEV1/FVC ratio
Time Frame: 2 days
FEEV1/FVC is the ratio of FEV1 to FVC. In healthy adults, this should be approximately 70-80%
2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abeer Fatima, MSPT-CPPT, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 30, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hiatal Hernia

Clinical Trials on Volume-oriented incentive spirometry

3
Subscribe