Biomechanical and Neurophysiological Evaluation of the Effect of a Motor Block and an Injection of Botulinum Toxin on the Stiffness of the Paretic Sural Triceps Muscle (RAI PAR BLOC)

July 21, 2023 updated by: Nantes University Hospital
The research "Biomechanical and neurophysiological evaluation of the effects of a motor block and an injection of botulinum toxin on the stiffness of the paretic sural triceps muscle" will study the response to passive stretching in the neurological patient presenting spastic paresis after a stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Following a stroke, patients see their motor function impaired, in particular by the establishment of muscular retractions. These affect motor performance of the patients, as for example by impairing their walking capabilities and are responsible for long-term orthopedic deformities. Muscular structure influencing ankle and foot mobility are particularly evaluated in daily practice due to the major impact of muscle retraction on patients' mobility.

During clinical examination, the evaluator searches the presence of the clinical markers of muscle retraction. However their clinical evaluation remains subjective and does not always allow to identify the precise location (which muscles) and origin (muscle contraction or retraction) of the observed response.

In that case, the sensitive nerve block (BNS)can complete the clinical examination. Its efficacy and selectivity are difficult to evaluate in a precise manner by a clinical examination on its own. Moreover, the possibility to predict the effect of a long-lasting spasticity treatment, like a botulinum toxin injection (ITB), from the effect of a BNS, has not been proven on the sural triceps muscle.

The study will use several evaluation techniques by biomechanical, neurophysiological and ultrasound (elastography) study which allow to quantify the response level within a muscle (measure of the muscle stiffness and retraction).

This study will take place within the rehabilitation and physical medicine department, patients are hospitalized or seen during stroke follow-up examination for uncomfortable sural triceps spasticity. They are evaluated by a quantified walking test, followed by a BNS, if the BNS result is positive, they are treated by a botulinum toxin injection in the sural triceps. The stiffness measurements before BNS (J0), after BNS (J0 post BNS) and after ITB (at day 28) will be standardized and additional instrumental examinations will be realized to understand the effects of the BNS and ITB procedure. The stretching will be performed by an isokinetic dynamometer and the muscle response to the stretching will be achieved by simultaneous evaluation of the response of the leg muscles by elastography and electromyography. In addition, clinical and neurophysiological data (exploration of nerve conduction on the tibial nerve) will be measured

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France
        • CHU de Nantes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria :

  • Patient with signed consent,
  • Be over 18 and under 80 years of age,
  • Have suffered a stroke (medical diagnosis),
  • Spasticity of the triceps surae with a modified Ashworth score of the triceps sural of at least 1,
  • Medical indication to perform a treatment of spasticity of the sural triceps by ITB, requiring a prior selective nerve block to qualify or disqualify this procedure (depending on the effectiveness, reaction / sensations / perceptions of the patient),
  • Cognitive abilities compatible with experimentation: absence of language or judgment impairments that prevent the understanding of the research or the expression of agreement. An aphasia severity score > or equal to 3 will be required for inclusion,
  • Be eligible for social security.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Person in an emergency situation, deprived of liberty, or not benefiting from the social protection system,
  • Person under 18 years of age or under any legal protection measure whatsoever,
  • Unbalanced epileptic disorder; tension variability,
  • History of calf surgery (scarring areas that disrupt ultrasound elastography exploration),
  • Disorders related to bed rest: thromboembolic disorders, bedsores, respiratory or digestive disorders,
  • Previous botulinum toxin injection injection less than 3 months ago (contraindication to a new botulinum toxin injection),
  • Contraindication to an injection of botulinum toxin abobotulinum toxin A (Dysport®),
  • Patient under anti-coagulant,
  • Aphasia or cognitive impairment interfering with task comprehension,
  • Contraindication to ankle manipulation: fracture, phlebitis, pressure sore in the areas of support of the orthosis,
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Biomecanical evaluation of the selective nerve block effects

D0 :

  • Information, collection of consent, inclusion,
  • Clinical and instrumental evaluation,
  • Realization of the selective nerve block,
  • Post-selective nerve block clinical and instrumental re-evaluation,
  • Performance of the botulinum toxin injection if indication selected.

D28 (+/-5 days) :

- Clinical and instrumental post-botulinum toxin injection evaluation.

D0 :

  • Information, collection of consent, inclusion,
  • Clinical and instrumental evaluation,
  • Realization of the selective nerve block,
  • Post-selective nerve block clinical and instrumental re-evaluation,
  • Performance of the botulinum toxin injection if indication selected.

D28 (+/-5 days) :

- Clinical and instrumental post-botulinum toxin injection evaluation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomecanical evaluation of the selective nerve block effects on soleus muscle stiffness (distal part) during stretching of the plantar flexor muscles in the patient after a stroke.
Time Frame: 20 minutes post selective nerve block at Day 0
Study of the soleus (distal) muscle stiffness before and after the realization of selective nerve block of the soleus nerve. The muscle stiffness is assessed by measuring the shearing module (in kilopascals) by elastography SSI during the slow passive stretching (2°/sec) realized by an isokinetic ergometer during the examination before and after the selective nerve block realization.
20 minutes post selective nerve block at Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomechanical effect of selective nerve block on proximal soleus muscle stiffness when stretching plantar flexor muscles
Time Frame: 20 minutes post selective nerve block at Day 0
Study of the variation of the proximal soleus muscle stiffness between before and after performing the selective nerve block of the soleus nerve
20 minutes post selective nerve block at Day 0
Neurophysiological effects of the motor block on nerve transmission and muscle activation.
Time Frame: 20 minutes post selective nerve block at Day 0
Neurophysiological effects will be evaluated by: (i) the variations in amplitude and latency of the M wave, of the H response, and of the Hmax/Mmax ratio, and (ii) the change in muscle activity (measured by electromyography) between before and after selective nerve block. Muscle activity will be recorded during the entire passive dorsal ankle flexion movement with the dynamometer. It will be quantified by the area under the curve of the EMG signal recorded for each site (distal soleus and proximal soleus), after usual treatment of the EMG signal to obtain an envelope (filtering, rectification and normalization)
20 minutes post selective nerve block at Day 0
Inter-individual variability of the decrease in muscle stiffness after selective nerve block
Time Frame: 20 minutes post selective nerve block at Day 0
Variability of the selective nerve block response between the patients, measures of the decrease in muscle stiffness will be taken into account for each musce site : distal soleus and proximal soleus.
20 minutes post selective nerve block at Day 0
Biomechanical effect of botulinum toxin injection on muscle stiffness of the soleus (distal part) when stretching the plantar flexor muscles.
Time Frame: Day 28 post botulinum toxin injection
Variation of the muscle stiffness of the distal and proximal soleus between before and after botulinum toxin injection.
Day 28 post botulinum toxin injection
Inter-individual variability of the decrease in muscle stiffness after botulinum toxin injection.
Time Frame: Day 28 post botulinum toxin injection
Inter-patient variability for the answer to the botulinum toxin injection, muscle stiffness reduction measures will be taken into account for each muscle site : distal soleus and proximal soleus.
Day 28 post botulinum toxin injection
Relationship between selective nerve block effect and botulinum toxin injection effect.
Time Frame: Day 28 post botulinum toxin injection
The relationship between the selective nerve block effect and the botulinum toxin injection effect will be evaluated by calculating correlations between the stiffness variation before and after each intervention.
Day 28 post botulinum toxin injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

July 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebrovascular Accident

Clinical Trials on Selective nerve block

3
Subscribe