Task of Acoustic-phonetic Decoding on Anatomic Deficits in Paramedical Assessment of Speech Disorders for Patients Treated for Oral or Oropharyngeal Cancer (DAPADAF-E)

July 21, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Validity of a Task of Acoustic-phonetic Decoding on Anatomic Deficits in Paramedical Assessment of Speech Disorders for Patients Treated for Oral or Oropharyngeal Cancer

The bridging of the gap between speech production and perception by the interlocutor would be made possible by the use of a more suitable and automatic task. An acoustic-phonetic decoding test (or DAP in French, i.e. the production of isolated pseudo-words in repetition or reading), created within the framework of the The French National Cancer Institute (InCA) C2SI project, avoids the effects of cognitive restoration by the interlocutor. An automatic score from the DAP would lead to an overall score per patient, but also to scores specific to each phonetic segment, to be correlated with the analytical scores from each anatomical oropharyngeal segment.

The study hypothesis is that the automatic processing of an acoustic-phonetic decoding task during the assessment in current practice is a valid and reliable tool for diagnosing oropharyngeal analytical and dynamic deficits by highlighting deficient linguistic units.

The study hypothesis is that the automatic processing of an acoustico-phonetic decoding task during the assessment in current practice is a tool for diagnosing oropharyngeal analytical and dynamic deficits by highlighting deficient linguistic units.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Fifth cancer in terms of incidence in France, tumor pathologies of the upper aero-digestive tract, due to their location, impact the speech abilities of affected subjects. Speech therapy in paramedical clinical assessments consist of two parts.

  • The analytical part to highlight the anatomical and dynamic deficits of segments involved in speech.
  • The functional part characterizes the pathophysiological impact by means of an "ear" assessment.

The link between anatomy and functional speech deficit is very close in oncology (the location and the size of the tumor, the structural changes due to the treatment who modify the oropharyngeal dynamics and the mechanisms involved in the production of the speech), but the correlation is weak between functional intelligibility scores and analytical motor scores. Indeed, the perception of speech by a human listener is not a simple "recording" of the production, but a representation of this production after implementation of individual mechanisms for restoring the acoustic information linked to the lexicon or to the context by the listener. The listener's degree of familiarity with the speaker or his pathology is also a source of variability.

The bridging of the gap between speech production and perception by the interlocutor would be made possible by the use of a more suitable and automatic task. An acoustic-phonetic decoding test (or DAP in French, i.e. the production of isolated pseudo-words in repetition or reading), created within the framework of the InCA C2SI project, avoids the effects of cognitive restoration by the interlocutor. An automatic score from the DAP would lead to an overall score per patient, but also to scores specific to each phonetic segment, to be correlated with the analytical scores from each anatomical oropharyngeal segment.

The study hypothesis is that the automatic processing of an acoustic-phonetic decoding task during the assessment in current practice is a valid and reliable tool for diagnosing oropharyngeal analytical and dynamic deficits by highlighting deficient linguistic units.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

116

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France
        • Recruiting
        • AP- H Marseille - Hôpital de la Conception
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Camille GALANT
      • Toulouse, France
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Toulouse
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Clémence DEVOUCOUX
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Anaïs GALTIER
      • Toulouse, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pauline CHAUSSIER

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All site have an active group of person allowing a feasibility of recruitment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged at least 18 years old and benefiting from a social security scheme
  • Native French-speaking patients
  • Patients treated for cancer of the oral cavity or oropharynx (surgical and / or radiotherapy and / or chemotherapy treatment)
  • Patients in clinical remission for at least 6 months (chronic nature and stability of the disorders)
  • All tumor sizes according to the tumor (T), node (N), and metastasis (M) categories (TNM classification) (T1 to T4)
  • Patients with a perceptible speech disorder in a conversational situation or not (to allow the determination of fine deficits)
  • Patients who do not object to carrying out the research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with an associated pathology potentially responsible for speech or fluency disorders (joint, speech and language disorders of developmental, organic or functional origin, voice disorders of organic or functional origin, stammering , stammering, fluency disturbances, speech disturbances of neurological origin)
  • Patients reporting an auditory complaint and not having a hearing aid
  • Inability to provide the person with enlightened information and to ensure the subject's compliance because of impaired physical and / or psychological health,
  • Patients participating in another research including an exclusion period still in progress.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients treated for an oral or oropharyngeal tumor for at least 6 months
Completion of speech-related quality of life autoquestionnaires Routine speech assessment Acoustic-phonetic decoding task (DAP) two lists of 16 pseudo-words

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation coefficient
Time Frame: Day 1
Correlation coefficient between he automatic score by phoneme class from the DAP and the score for each oropharyngeal anatomical segment from muscle testing
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Human perceptual score - Direct transcription
Time Frame: Day 1
the speech therapist will transcribe the pseudo-word he thinks he has recognized immediately after the subject says it, using software installed on the examination computer. A perceptual score of linguistic traits of average difference (between expected production and perception by the speech therapist) by phoneme will then be determined.
Day 1
Human perceptual score - jury transcription
Time Frame: Day 1
Audio recordings of the task will be made. A perceptual score of linguistic traits of average difference (between expected production and perception by the jury) by phoneme will then be determined
Day 1
Head and Neck Carcinologic Handicap Index (HNCHI)
Time Frame: Day 1
Correlation between HNCHI and scores from the DAP
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Clémence DEVOUCOUX, University Hospital, Toulouse

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 22, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 22, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

July 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Speech Intelligibility

Clinical Trials on Acoustic-phonetic decoding task (DAP)

3
Subscribe