Positioning the Trunk and Upper Limb to Improve the Coordination of the Hand Movement After Stroke

March 3, 2021 updated by: Anna Olczak, Military Institute of Medicine, Poland

Positioning the Trunk and Upper Limb to Improve the Coordination of the Wrist and Fingers After Stroke

This study investigated how torso and shoulder positioning can help restore coordinated hand movements in stroke patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stroke patients and healthy subjects were randomly divided into two different groups and tested in different positions. In study group 1, the exercise test consisted of two motor tasks carried out in two different starting positions: sitting and supine. During the first examination, the subject sat on the therapeutic table (without back support), feet resting on the floor (active stabilization of the trunk and shoulder). The upper limb was examined in adduction, with the elbow bent in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. In the supine position, the upper limb was held beside the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position; passive stabilization of the trunk and shoulder).

In study group 2, the exercise test again consisted of two motor tasks carried out in two different starting positions: supine with the upper extremity positioned perpendicularly to the trunk (passive stabilization of the trunk, active stabilization of the shoulder), and supine with the upper limb held beside the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position; passive stabilization of the trunk and shoulder).

A manual electronic dynamometer (EH 101) was used for grip strength measurement (error of measurement, 0.5 kg/lb). A Hand Tutor device (composed of a safe and comfortable glove equipped with position and motion sensors, and the Medi Tutor(TM) software) was used to measure the range of passive and active movement (error of measurement, 5 - 10 mm), as well as the speed/frequency of movement (error of measurement, 0,5 cycle/sec.).

First, the range of passive movement in the radial-carpal joint (flexion and extension) and fingers (global flexion and extension) was measured in each position using the Hand Tutor Device. Then the subject made active movements in the same order. Finally, the subject was asked to make moves as quickly and in as full a range as possible. The measurement of grip strength with a dynamometer was performed in each position after the range of motion and speed/frequency tests.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

277

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Masovian District
      • Warsaw, Masovian District, Poland, 04-141
        • Military Institute of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 87 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Study Group Inclusion Criteria:1) patients with hemiparesis after 5 to 7 weeks after stroke; 2) no severe deficits in communication, memory, or understanding what can impede proper measurement performance; 3) at least 20 years of age.

-

Exclusion Criteria: 1) stroke up to 5 weeks after the episode; 2) epilepsy; 3) lack of trunk stability; 4) no wrist and hand movement; 5) high very low blood pressure; 6) dizziness; 7) malaise

Control Group

Inclusion Criteria: 1) the control group consisted of subjects free from the upper extremity motor coordination disorders; 2) at least 20 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria: 1) history of neurologic or musculoskeletal disorders such as carpal tunnel syndrome, tendonitis, stroke, head injury, or other conditions that could affect their ability to active movement and handgrip; 2) severe deficits in communication, memory, or understanding what can impede proper measurement performance; 3) high very low blood pressure; 4) dizziness; 5) malaise

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Positioning the trunk and upper limb to improve the coordination the hand.
The study investigated the effects of the trunk and upper limb positioning on improving wrist and hand coordination.
The subject sat on the therapeutic table (without back support), feet resting on the floor. The upper limb was examined in adduction, with the elbow bent in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. Wrist and a hand free from stabilization.
motor tasks carried out in starting positions: supine with the upper extremity positioned perpendicularly to the trunk; the upper limb in adduction and flexion in the humeral joint, elbow extension, forearm in the intermediate position; elbow, wrist, hand free from stabilization.
In the supine position, the upper limb was held beside the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm. Wrist and a hand free from stabilization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of passive movement of the wrist
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the range of passive movement of the wrist (in mm).
up to 10 weeks
Range of active movement of the wrist
Time Frame: up to 10 week
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the range of active movement of the wrist (in mm)
up to 10 week
Wrist extension deficit (mm). The extension deficit refers to the difference between passive and active ROM.
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the extension deficit (in mm)
up to 10 weeks
Wrist flexion deficit mm
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the flexion deficit (in mm). The flexion deficit refers to the difference between passive and active ROM.
up to 10 weeks
Wrist maximum range of motion (ROM), mm
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the maximum range of motion (ROM) (in mm), from flexion to extension.
up to 10 weeks
Frequency of wrist movement (flexion to extension), cycles#/sec
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the speed or frequency (i.e., the number of cycles per sec).
up to 10 weeks
Range of passive movement of the fingers
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the passive movement of the fingers (in mm)
up to 10 weeks
Range of active movement of the fingers
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the active movement of the fingers (in mm)
up to 10 weeks
Fingers extension deficit mm
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the extension deficit (in mm). The extension deficit refers to the difference between passive and active ROM.
up to 10 weeks
Fingers flexion deficit mm
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the flexion deficit (in mm). The flexion deficit refers to the difference between passive and active ROM.
up to 10 weeks
Fingers maximum range of motion (ROM), mm
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the maximum range of motion (ROM) (in mm), from flexion to extension of each finger.
up to 10 weeks
Frequency of fingers movement (flexion to extension), cycles#/sec
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the speed or frequency (i.e., the number of cycles per sec)
up to 10 weeks
Assessment of the grip strength
Time Frame: up to 10 weeks
Grip strength, kg (a manusl electronic dynamometr (EH 101) was used for grip strength
up to 10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 5, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 15, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on hand motor coordination in a sitting positin

3
Subscribe