A Clinical Study to Evaluated Which Number of Passes of EUS-FNB is Better for Culturing Primary Cells of PDAC

A Randomized Controlled, Blinded, Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating the Effect of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With Different Number of Passes on the Success Rate of Primary Cell Culture of Pancreatic Cancer

The Aim of this study is to investigate the amount of tissue required for the successful culture of primary cells from human-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma which obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy wet suction technique

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Pancreatic cancer is one of the malignant tumors with the highest mortality rate in the world, with a 5-year survival rate of only 7.2%-9%. Because some patients are resistant to multiple chemotherapy drugs, and there are differences in drug sensitivity between individuals, the current pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) chemotherapy effect is not satisfactory. In order to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy and achieve precise treatment, it is important to establish an accurate and individualized PDAC research model.

Because most of patients with PDAC have developed to advanced stage at the time of diagnosis, it is not suitable for surgery. That limits our ability to obtain tumor cells seriously. With the development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) technique, it can be used not only to diagnose diseases, but also to provide specimens for molecular analysis and create valuable preclinical disease research models, so as to guide the selection of the most appropriate individualized treatment. EUS-FNB can obtain lesions without any treatment. Therefore, the preclinical disease research model established by EUS-FNB is more representative of the original tumor.

However, compared with surgical specimens, the specimens obtained by EUS-FNB are smaller in size, which may affect the successful construction of research models in vitro. Therefore, the investigators plan to use EUS-FNB wet suction technique, a modified specimen acquisition method, to obtain PDAC tissue, and use it for primary cell culture, to explore the amount of tissue required for the successful cultivation of human-derived pancreatic cancer primary cells, so as to provide a prerequisite for the successful establishment of human-derived preclinical disease research model.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410013
        • Recruiting
        • The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University,
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female, age≥18
  2. Imaging examination (US, MRI, CT or PET-CT) of patients confirmed pancreatic lesions, and considered the possibility of PDAC, EUS-FNB was needed for auxiliary diagnosis
  3. No chemotherapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and palliative chemotherapy, has been performed on patients
  4. Agree to attend this study and signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Poor physical condition, including but not limited to hemoglobin ≤ 8.0g/dl, severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency, etc
  2. Coagulation dysfunction (platelet count < 50 × 1012, international standardized ratio > 1.5), or inability to discontinue anticoagulation therapy
  3. High risk for deep sedation
  4. Acute pancreatitis in the previous 2 weeks
  5. Pregnancy or lactation
  6. Any diseases leading to unreliable follow-up
  7. Absence of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: one pass group
We use the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) wet suction technique to procure the specimens, and use the sample obtained from a single pass for primary cell culture. EUS-FNB wet suction technique refer from Tong T, et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;10.1111/jgh.15371.
Each patient's operation process is the same, that is, after obtaining enough specimens for diagnosis by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) wet suction technique, additional three passes are performed. One of which is randomly selected as the one pass group, and the other two passes automatically as the two pass group. Please refer to the literature for EUS-FNB wet technique (Tong T, et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;10.1111/jgh.15371.)
Experimental: two passes group
We use the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) wet suction technique to procure the specimens, and use the sample obtained from two passes for primary cell culture. EUS-FNB wet suction technique refer from Tong T, et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;10.1111/jgh.15371.
Each patient's operation process is the same, that is, after obtaining enough specimens for diagnosis by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) wet suction technique, additional three passes are performed. One of which is randomly selected as the one pass group, and the other two passes automatically as the two pass group. Please refer to the literature for EUS-FNB wet technique (Tong T, et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;10.1111/jgh.15371.)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in the success rate of culturing primary cells
Time Frame: About 6 weeks after operation
Differences in the success rate of pancreatic cancer primary cells (P1) and culture to the third generation (P3) between the two groups.
About 6 weeks after operation
The difference in the representation to the original tumor between the two groups of primary cells
Time Frame: About 8 weeks after operation
Through Western Blot and PCR methods to detect the representativeness of primary cells to the primary tumor. If the patient underwent surgery later, hematoxylin-eosin staining and/or immunohistochemistry were added to compare the histological morphology with the original tumor.
About 8 weeks after operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The relationship between the success rate of primary cell culture and some tumor characteristics
Time Frame: About 6 weeks after operation
Statistical methods such as chi-square test are used to analyze whether the success rate of primary cell culture is related to the tumor size, degree of differentiation, clinical stage, and the length of macroscopic visible core tissue.
About 6 weeks after operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiaoyan Wang, M.D., The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021EUS-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on different number of passes

3
Subscribe