Diagnostic Accuracy Comparison Between Telemedicine and Face-to-face Consultations in Respiratory Infection Patients.

August 25, 2021 updated by: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

Randomized Trial of Diagnostic Accuracy of Medical Evaluation by Telemedicine Compared to Face-to-face Medical Evaluation in an Emergency Care Unit in Immunocompetent Adult Patients With Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Airway Infection

This is a randomized study that sought to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the telemedicine consultation of patients suspected of respiratory tract infections during COVID-19 pandemic in comparison with the face-to-face evaluation at the emergency department.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Unicentric, prospective and randomized study performed between September and November 2020 with adult patients who sought care at emergency department. The inclusion criterion was the exhibition of any tract respiratory symptom. Patients older than 65 years, with chronic heart or lung diseases or immunosuppressed were excluded. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 for a brief telemedicine consultation, blinded to subsequent face-to-face evaluation or direct face-to-face evaluation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05652-900
        • Hospital Israelita Abert Einstein

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with at least one acute symptom compatible with RTI (sore throat, nasal obstruction, coryza, new or growing cough, sputum, hoarseness, dyspnea) in presence or absence of symptoms related to the infection (fever ≥ 38oC, chills, sweating, myalgia) that motivated spontaneously face-to-face evaluation at the ED.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with diagnosis of chronic respiratory diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and interstitial lung disease)
  • Patients with previous diagnosis of congestive heart failure,
  • Patients with HIV / AIDS
  • Patients with active cancer
  • Patients with type I diabetes mellitus
  • Patients in use of any immunosuppressant
  • Patients with chronic cough
  • Patiets that referral to emergency room after nursing triage.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Adult patients with respiratory tract symptom - telemedicine before face-to-face evaluation
We included adults (≥18 years of age) who had at least one acute symptom compatible with Respiratory Tract Infection (sore throat, nasal obstruction, coryza, new or growing cough, sputum, hoarseness, dyspnea) with or without symptoms related to the infection (fever ≥ 38oC, chills, sweating, myalgia) who have undergone telemedicine consultation before face-to-face evaluation
Brief telemedicine consultation, blinded to subsequent face-to-face evaluation.
Direct face-to-face evaluation (without telemedicine consultation before).
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Adult patients with respiratory tract symptom - only face-to-face evaluation
We included adults (≥18 years of age) who had at least one acute symptom compatible with Respiratory Tract Infection (sore throat, nasal obstruction, coryza, new or growing cough, sputum, hoarseness, dyspnea) with or without symptoms related to the infection (fever ≥ 38oC, chills, sweating, myalgia) who have undergone only face-to-face evaluation
Direct face-to-face evaluation (without telemedicine consultation before).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of final evaluation ICD 10-code diagnosis.
Time Frame: up to 10 months
All institutional Emergency Department or Telemedicine assessments involve filling out the final diagnosis on an International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10)-code basis in the electronic medical record before discharge to home or admission. For aggregation of most prevalent RTI with similar pathophysiologic characteristics, three diagnostic groups were defined, based on ICD 10 codes: RTI, including COVID-19 (B34.2, B34.9, B97.2, J00, J04, J06, J11, J20, J30, J39, U07.1); PT - Acute Pharyngotonsillitis (J02-J03.9) and AS - Acute Sinusitis (J01-J01.9).
up to 10 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of medical care
Time Frame: up to 10 months
Comparison of time (minutes) of medical care between telemedicine and face-to-face consultation.
up to 10 months
Rate of indication for complementary exams
Time Frame: up to 10 months
Comparison of rate (percentage) of indication for complementary exams between telemedicine and face-to-face consultation.
up to 10 months
Type of requested exams
Time Frame: up to 10 months
Comparison of type of requested exams (porcentage) between telemedicine and face-to-face consultation.
up to 10 months
Type of Medical prescription
Time Frame: up to 10 months
Comparison of type of medical prescription after completion of the service between telemedicine and face-to-face consultation
up to 10 months
Type of proposed destination after completion of the service
Time Frame: up to 10 months
Comparison of proposed destination (percentage of discharge or hospitalization) after completion of the service between telemedicine and face-to-face consultation.
up to 10 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 31, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Tract Infections

Clinical Trials on Telemedicine Consultation

3
Subscribe