- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04813432
Multiple Arterial Phase Computed Tomography Examination to Improve Detection of Tumors in the Liver and Pancreas
Low Dose Multi-arterial Phase CT Imaging for Improved Detection of Liver Tumors and Pancreatic Masses
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background: Many previous studies have analyzed and proposed different strategies to achieve optimal contrast timing and enhancement in the late arterial phase to best depict arterialized lesions in the liver and hypoattenuating tumors in the pancreas(1-12). But even with the use of state-of-the-art protocols, inter-subject variations of optimal contrast enhancement in liver lesions and pancreas parenchyma are still very common. The aim of this study is to first analyze these alterations and to, secondly, use the newly gained knowledge to design a dose-neutral multiple arterial phase protocol. An optimized arterial phase protocol might improve the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and/or pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Purpose: To measure when the greatest difference in attenuation occurs in HCC compared to background liver parenchyma resp. in pancreatic lesions vs. pancreatic parenchyma. To describe the inter-subject variation of these enhancement times and to evaluate at which time-points an optimal late arterial phase can be achieved. The investigators will use the perfusion scanning technique, bolus-tracking and high body-weight-adjusted volumes of contrast media (CM).
Anticipated results: The aim is to find the best time points for optimal CM-enhancement in HCC lesions and pancreas parenchyma. The results will show the extent of the inter-subject temporal enhancement differences and will be used to design an optimized late arterial phase protocol for clinical practice and future studies.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Stockholm, Sweden, 14186
- Radiology Department, Karolinska Huddinge university hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients, who are scheduled for a multiphasic liver or pancreas CT because of known or suspected malignancy in the liver or pancreas.
Exclusion Criteria:
- below 50 years of age, contrast media allergy or decreased kidney function
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Peak enhancement values measured in Hounsfield units(HU) in abdominal aorta.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in abdominal aorta.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement times measured in seconds in abdominal aorta.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in abdominal aorta.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement values measured in Hounsfield units(HU) in celiac trunc.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in celiac trunc.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement times measured in seconds in celiac trunc.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in celiac trunc.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement values measured in Hounsfield units(HU) in superior mesenteric artery (SMA).
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in SMA.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement times measured in seconds in superior mesenteric artery (SMA).
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in SMA.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement values measured in Hounsfield units(HU) in hepatic artery.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in hepatic artery.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement times measured in seconds in hepatic artery.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in hepatic artery.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement values measured in Hounsfield units(HU) in portal vein.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in portal vein.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement times measured in seconds in portal vein.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in portal vein.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement values measured in Hounsfield units(HU) in pancreas parenchyma.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in pancreas parenchyma.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement values measured in Hounsfield units(HU) in pancreatic lesions.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in pancreatic lesions.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement times measured in seconds in pancreas parenchyma.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in pancreas parenchyma.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement times measured in seconds in pancreatic lesions.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in pancreatic lesions.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement values measured in Hounsfield units(HU) in liver parenchyma.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in liver parenchyma.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement values measured in Hounsfield units(HU) in hepatic lesions.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in hepatic lesions.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement times measured in seconds in liver parenchyma.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in liver parenchyma.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Peak enhancement times measured in seconds in hepatic lesions.
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Creation of time attenuation curves (TAC) in hepatic lesions.
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
highest enhancement difference between a hepatic lesion and background liver parenchyma
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
To measure the highest enhancement difference in Hounsfield units(HU) between a hepatic lesion and background liver parenchyma
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
time-point of highest enhancement difference between a hepatic lesion and background liver parenchyma
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
To depict the time-point of the highest enhancement difference between a hepatic lesion and background liver parenchyma by comparing their tissue attenuation curves
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
highest enhancement difference between a pancreatic lesion and background pancreatic parenchyma
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
To measure the highest enhancement difference in Hounsfield units(HU) between a pancreatic lesion and background pancreas parenchyma
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
time-point of highest enhancement difference between a pancreatic lesion and background pancreatic parenchyma
Time Frame: at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
To depict the time-point of the highest enhancement difference between a pancreatic lesion and background pancreas parenchyma by comparing their tissue attenuation curves
|
at the time of intervention (= Multi-phasic CT scan of the abdomen)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Katharina Brehmer, MD, Karolinska Institutet
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):32-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090908.
- Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Miyoshi T, Shiratori Y, Onozuka M, Moriyama N, Bae KT. MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Mar;188(3):751-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0372.
- Bae KT, Heiken JP. Scan and contrast administration principles of MDCT. Eur Radiol. 2005 Dec;15 Suppl 5:E46-59. doi: 10.1007/s10406-005-0165-y.
- Rengo M, Bellini D, De Cecco CN, Osimani M, Vecchietti F, Caruso D, Maceroni MM, Lucchesi P, Iafrate F, Paolantonio P, Ferrari R, Laghi A. The optimal contrast media policy in CT of the liver. Part I: Technical notes. Acta Radiol. 2011 Jun 1;52(5):467-72. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.100499. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
- Rengo M, Bellini D, De Cecco CN, Osimani M, Vecchietti F, Caruso D, Maceroni MM, Lucchesi P, Iafrate F, Palombo E, Paolantonio P, Ferrari R, Laghi A. The optimal contrast media policy in CT of the liver. Part II: Clinical protocols. Acta Radiol. 2011 Jun 1;52(5):473-80. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.100500. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
- Fleischmann D, Kamaya A. Optimal vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement: the current state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009 Jan;47(1):13-26. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.009.
- Delrue L, Blanckaert P, Mertens D, De Waele J, Ceelen W, Achten E, Duyck P. Variability of CT contrast enhancement in the pancreas: a cause for concern? Pancreatology. 2011;11(6):588-94. doi: 10.1159/000334547. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
- Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Yokoyama R, Miyoshi T, Nishibori H, Kato H, Hoshi H, Onozuka M, Moriyama N. MDCT of the liver and hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas: optimizing scan delays for bolus-tracking techniques of hepatic arterial and portal venous phases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jul;187(1):W25-32. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1878.
- Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, Sagel SS, Crowe TM, Gaines MV. Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology. 1995 May;195(2):353-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724752.
- Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Araki T. Multiphasic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row CT of liver: contrast-enhancement theory and practical scan protocol with a combination of fixed injection duration and patients' body-weight-tailored dose of contrast material. Eur J Radiol. 2006 May;58(2):165-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.11.037. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
- Schueller G, Schima W, Schueller-Weidekamm C, Weber M, Stift A, Gnant M, Prokesch R. Multidetector CT of pancreas: effects of contrast material flow rate and individualized scan delay on enhancement of pancreas and tumor contrast. Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):441-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412051107. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
- Tang A, Billiard JS, Chagnon DO, Rizk F, Olivie D, Turcotte S, Chagnon M, Lepanto L. Optimal Pancreatic Phase Delay with 64-Detector CT Scanner and Bolus-tracking Technique. Acad Radiol. 2014 Aug;21(8):977-85. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.04.004.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- EPN Diarienr. 2018/859-31
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer
-
City of Hope Medical CenterRecruitingPancreatic Neoplasms | Pancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Resectable | Pancreatic Carcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Non-resectable | Pancreatic Cancer Stage III | Pancreatic Cancer Stage | Pancreatic Cancer Stage II | Pancreatic Cancer, Adult | Pancreatic... and other conditionsKorea, Republic of, United States, Japan
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...CelgeneWithdrawnPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
University of NebraskaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage II Pancreatic Cancer | Stage I Pancreatic Cancer | Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Recurrent Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Resectable Pancreatic Cancer | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer | Poorly Differentiated Malignant Neoplasm | Undifferentiated Pancreatic CarcinomaUnited States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompletedStage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Fudan UniversityUnknownStage ⅠA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage ⅠB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage ⅡA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage ⅡB Pancreatic CancerChina
-
University of UtahNovartis PharmaceuticalsRecruitingMetastatic Pancreatic Carcinoma | Unresectable Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage II Pancreatic CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on Computed Tomography of the Abdomen
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingFAST (Focussed Assessment With Sonography in Trauma)
-
Bispebjerg HospitalCompleted
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteCompletedDeep Vein Thrombosis | Venous Thromboembolism | Pulmonary EmbolismCanada
-
Aalborg University HospitalCompletedAcute Intestinal Ischemia
-
Tufts Medical Center4DMedicalEnrolling by invitationDyspnea | Post-Acute COVID-19 | Post COVID-19 Condition | Post Viral FatigueUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNational Cancer Institute, France; Ministère de la Santé et des SolidaritésRecruitingLung Cancer ScreeningFrance
-
Radboud University Medical CenterCompletedWounds and Injuries | Wrist InjuriesNetherlands
-
Umeå UniversityUnknownParastomal HerniaSweden
-
Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton RougeCompletedDegenerative Disc Disease | Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Spondylolisthesis | Spinal DegenerationUnited States