A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy Of Tafamidis In Chinese Participants With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM)

November 25, 2024 updated by: Pfizer

A Study to Characterize the Safety and Efficacy of Tafamidis Once Daily in the Treatment of Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy in Chinese Participants

This is a national, multi-center, single-arm study, open-label to patients with symptomatic Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) who are tafamidis naïve. This study is to obtain safety, descriptive efficacy, Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) data for tafamidis orally once daily.

Subject eligibility for participation in the study will receive tafamidis once daily or 12 months following the assessment as the screening and baseline, month 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 visits (or Early Study Discontinuation).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200025
        • Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100034
        • Peking University First Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100191
        • Peking University Third Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
        • Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410011
        • The Second Xiangya Hospital Of Central South University
    • Liaoning
      • Dalian, Liaoning, China, 116014
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • West China Hospital of Sichuan University
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310009
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has documented ATTR-CM.
  2. For the reproductive criteria for male and female participants, please refer to relevant protocol sections.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition including recent or active suicidal ideation or behavior or laboratory abnormality, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study.
  2. Participants who have prior liver and/or heart transplant.
  3. Participants with primary (light chain) or secondary amyloidosis.
  4. Previous administration with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half lives preceding the first dose of study intervention used in this study (whichever is longer).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Chinese participants treated with Tafamidis
treatment group with tafamidis
61 mg, once daily, oral administration, for 12 months.
Other Names:
  • Vyndamax, Tafamidis free acid, PF 06291826

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From first dose of study intervention on Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days post the last dose of study intervention (up to a maximum of 393 days)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. All AEs that started after the first dosing but before the last dose plus the lag time (28 days) were TEAEs. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect. A severe TEAE was an event that prevented normal everyday activities. Severe TEAEs were assessed by the investigator.
From first dose of study intervention on Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days post the last dose of study intervention (up to a maximum of 393 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs
Time Frame: From first dose of study intervention on Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days post the last dose of study intervention (up to a maximum of 393 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. All AEs that started after the first dosing but before the last dose plus the lag time (28 days) were TEAEs. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect. A severe TEAE was an event that prevented normal everyday activities. Severe TEAEs and treatment-related TEAEs were assessed by the investigator.
From first dose of study intervention on Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days post the last dose of study intervention (up to a maximum of 393 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline (CFB) for Distance Walked During 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, months 6 and 12
As a measure of functional capacity, the 6MWT measured the distance a participant could walk on a straight course in 6 minutes. 6MWT was conducted in accordance with guidelines established by the American Thoracic Society at Month 6 and Month 12 visits. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first dose of study intervention.
Baseline, months 6 and 12
Change From Baseline for N Terminal Prohormone B Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, months 6 and 12
Plasma NT-proBNP is a guideline-mandated biomarker in heart failure. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Baseline, months 6 and 12
Percentage of Responders in Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization Post Dose at Months 1, 6, and 12
Time Frame: Predose on Day 1 (baseline), predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post dose at Month 12 visit
Blood sample of approximate 10 mL was collected at baseline, Months 1, 6, and 12 visits for measurement of TTR and TTR tetramer concentrations. TTR concentration was obtained prior to urea denaturation and TTR tetramer concentration was obtained after urea denaturation. Month 1 visit occurred 1 month post Day 1 +/- 1 week, Month 6 visit occurred 6 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks, and Month 12 visit occurred 12 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks or within 2 weeks after end of treatment. Responder was the participant who achieved TTR stabilization (ie, who had been TTR stabilized). Declaring a participant to have been (TTR) 'stabilized' was defined as the participant whose percent stabilization was equal to or greater than 32%. Percent stabilization (%) was calculated as ([fraction of initial {FOI} dosed - FOI baseline] / FOI baseline)×100, and FOI was calculated as average TTR tetramer concentration (post-denaturation) / average TTR concentration (pre-denaturation).
Predose on Day 1 (baseline), predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post dose at Month 12 visit
TTR Concentration at Baseline, Months 1, 6, and 12
Time Frame: Predose on Day 1 (baseline), predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post dose at Month 12 visit
One K2EDTA blood sample of approximate 10 mL was collected on Day 1 (baseline), and at Months 1, 6, and 12 visits for measurement of TTR concentration. Month 1 visit occurred 1 month post Day 1 +/- 1 week, Month 6 visit occurred 6 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks, and Month 12 visit occurred 12 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks or within 2 weeks after end of treatment.
Predose on Day 1 (baseline), predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post dose at Month 12 visit
Change From Baseline for Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) Scores at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12
The KCCQ is a self-administered, 23-item questionnaire. KCCQ-OS scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 range, with lower scores denoting poorer quality of life.
Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12
Change From Baseline for EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Values at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12
The EQ-5D-5L is a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. The instrument consists of 2 parts. In the first part, respondents are asked to rate their current health state on 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 5 levels of function (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems). The second part is a participant's self-rating of current health state on a Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS) with endpoints labeled 'best imaginable health state' (score of 100) and 'worst imaginable health state' (score of 0). The index values were calculated using the scoring algorithm based on preferences solicited from the Chinese population with 0 representing death and 1 representing full health. Higher EQ-5D-5L index value indicated a better quality of life. Change from baseline for EQ-5D-5L index values are reported for this outcome measure.
Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12
Change From Baseline for EuroQol VAS at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12
The EQ-5D-5L (5 levels version) is a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. The instrument consists of 2 parts. In the first part, respondents are asked to rate their current health state on 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 3 levels of function (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). The second part is a participant's self-rating of current health state on a EQ-5D VAS with endpoints labeled 'best imaginable health state' (score of 100) and 'worst imaginable health state' (score of 0). The scores from the 5 dimensions may be used to calculate a single index value, also known as a utility score. EQ-5D VAS scores are reported for this outcome measure.
Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12
Change From Baseline for Physical Component Summary (PCS) for Short-Form Survey 12 (SF-12) at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12
SF-12 is developed as a shorter alternative to the SF-36 for use in large-scale studies. It is an instrument with different weights for scoring physical and mental health, and measures health-related quality of life with 12 items categorized in eight areas: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health. This questionnaire was completed by the participant after the KCCQ and EQ-5D-5L, and prior to other required visit assessments. PCS score ranges from 0 to 100, and higher PCS score indicates a better quality of life. Change from baseline for PCS for SF-12 is reported for this outcome measure.
Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12
Change From Baseline for Mental Component Summary (MCS) for SF-12 at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12
SF-12 is developed as a shorter alternative to the SF-36 for use in large-scale studies. It is an instrument with different weights for scoring physical and mental health, and measures health-related quality of life with 12 items categorized in eight areas: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health. This questionnaire was completed by the participant after the KCCQ and EQ-5D-5L, and prior to other required visit assessments. MCS score ranges from 0 to 100, and higher MCS score indicates a better quality of life. Change from baseline for MCS for SF-12 is reported for this outcome measure.
Day 1 (baseline), Months 6, and 12
Plasma Concentrations of Tafamidis at Months 1, 6, and 12
Time Frame: Predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post at Month 12 visit
Blood samples of approximately 3 mL, to provide an approximately 1 mL plasma, were collected for measurement of plasma concentrations of tafamidis at Months 1, 6, and 12 visits. Month 1 visit occurred 1 month post Day 1 +/- 1 week, Month 6 visit occurred 6 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks, and Month 12 visit occurred 12 months post Day 1 +/- 2 weeks or within 2 weeks after end of treatment.
Predose and 3 hours post dose at Month 1 visit, 7 hours post dose at Month 6 visit, and 1 hour post at Month 12 visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • B3461077

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy

Clinical Trials on Tafamidis

Subscribe