Retrospective Study Collecting Neurological Follow-up of Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis (ATTRv) Patients Included in B3461028 and B3461045. (TRAMA)

November 15, 2023 updated by: Pfizer

Tafamidis 61mg, Outcomes in ATTR Amyloidosis With Neurologic and Multisystemic Involvement - TRAMA

A study of patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) and wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) that have been enrolled in B3461028 and B3461045 studies in Spain - exposed to tafamidis 61mg for ≥12 months with polyneuropathy (PN) have kept going to their multisystemic follow-ups (neuro/ophthalmo/gastrointestinal) ≥12 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08907
        • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
      • Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 07198
        • Hospital Son Llàtzer

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study population: retrospective cohort of patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) and wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) that have been enrolled in B3461028 and B3461045 studies in Spain - exposed to tafamidis 61mg for ≥12 months with polyneuropathy have kept going to their multisystemic follow-ups (neuro/ophthalmo/gastrointestinal) ≥12 months

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with tafamidis 61 mg ≥ 12 months
  • Neurological follow up ≥ 12 months
  • Diagnosis of transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTR-PN) based on one of the following:
  • Amplitude reduction in, at least, 2 nerves under normal value, excluding median nerve OR 50% amplitude reduction in, at least, 2 nerves on the basal value of the patient, excluding median nerve OR 2 abnormal tests detecting thin fibers alterations (through Sudo scan, RR Interval analysis, etc..)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with tafamidis 61 mg < 12 months
  • Neurological follow up < 12 months
  • Other diagnosis for polyneuropathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Retrospective cohort ATTRv and ATTRwt patients enrolled in B3461028 and B3461045 studies in Spain
61 milligrams (mg) as received in studies B3461028 and B3461045

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Month 12 for ATTRv
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
NIS (Neuropathy Impairment Score) is a clinically important, sensitive measure of individual neurological function, assessing sensory function, reflexes, and muscle weakness. NIS score ranged from 0 to 244, with higher score indicating greater disability or impairment. The rate of change was calculated from last follow-up.
Baseline and Month 12 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in NIS for ATTRv
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
NIS (Neuropathy Impairment Score) is a clinically important, sensitive measure of individual neurological function, assessing sensory function, reflexes, and muscle weakness. NIS score ranged from 0 to 244, with higher score indicating greater disability or impairment. The rate of change was calculated from last follow-up.
Baseline, Month 6, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Change in Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limbs (NIS-LL) for ATTRv
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
NIS-LL (Neuropathy Impairment Score Lower Limbs) is a clinically important, sensitive measure of neurological function in individuals, assessing sensory function, reflexes, and muscle weakness of the lower limbo. NÍS-LL assessed muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation. Each item is scored separately for left and right limbs. Components of muscle weakness:0(normal) to4(paralysis), higher score=more weakness; reflexes, sensation:0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Total NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=more impairment. The rate of change was calculated from last follow-up.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Change in Norfolk Quality of Life- Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) for ATTRv
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Norfolk Quality of Life Questionnaire for Diabetic Neuropathy is a standardized and validated instrument that assesses the effect of polyneuropathy on the functionality and quality of life of the individual. Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire is used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy; Item 1 to 7: related to symptoms and presence of symptom was assessed as 1 and absence was assessed as 0. Item 8-35: related to activities of daily living and scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0= no problem and 4= severe problem (except item 32, where -2= much better, 0=about the same, 2=much worse). TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -4 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Change in COMPASS-31 for ATTRv
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
COMPASS-31 (Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31) is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity and functional ability in participants with autonomic dysfunction. COMPASS-31 total score ranged from 0 to 100; where 0=Lesser severity of dysautonomia and 100=Greater severity of dysautonomia.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Change in Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy Specific Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (FAP-RODs) for ATTRv
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
FAP-RODS is a questionnaire that assessed the effect of neuropathy on daily activities. FAP-RODS total score ranged from 0 to 68; where, 0=Lower ability to perform daily activities and 68=Greater ability to perform daily activities.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants According to Familiar Amyloidotic Polyneuropathy Stage (FAP) for ATTRv
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 months after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
FAP is a stage system based on symptom severity and disease progression. FAP stages included: Asymptomatic; Free ambulation (walking without support): stage 1; Supportive ambulation (walking with support): stage 2; Wheelchair-bound or bedridden: stage 3.
Month 18, 24 and 30 months after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Percentage of Participants Who do Not Have Stage Progression in the PND Score for ATTRv
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 30 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
PND is a staging system that assess the degree of neuropathic dysfunction and its impact on ambulation. PND stages included: Asymptomatic; Stage I: Sensory disturbances, normal gait; Stage II: Sensory disturbances, altered gait not requiring support; IIIA: Gait requiring one support; IIIB: Gait requiring two supports; IV: Wheelchair or bedside. Participants who did not change to higher stages compared to the start of treatment was reported as Unchanged and those who progressed to higher stages were reported under Staging up.
From Baseline to Month 30 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Percentage of Responders to Treatment for ATTRv
Time Frame: Month 12 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Percentage of responders to treatment at Month 12 was defined as participants who achieved the change from baseline of less than 4 points in the NIS and participants who achieved the change from baseline of less than 2 points in the NIS-LL were reported in this outcome measure.
Month 12 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants With R-R Interval Variability for ATTRv
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of participants with R-R interval variability (altered/unaltered) was reported in this outcome measure.
Month 18, 24 and 30 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) for ATTRv
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 after start of treatment (data collected and analysed over 22 days)
BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared and measured as kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2). mBMI was calculated by multiplying BMI by serum albumin levels [gram/liter (g/L)].
Month 18, 24 and 30 after start of treatment (data collected and analysed over 22 days)
Ulnar/Sural Sensory Nerve Action Potential Amplitude (SNAP) for ATTRv
Time Frame: Month 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude (in microvolts) was measured using electromyography of the left lower limb.
Month 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Ulnar/Peroneal Compound Muscle Action Potential Amplitude (CMAP) for ATTRv
Time Frame: Month 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Peroneal motor nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude was measured using electromyography of the left lower limb.
Month 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Change in NIS for ATTRwt
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
NIS (Neuropathy Impairment Score) was a clinically important, sensitive measure of individual neurological function, assessing sensory function, reflexes, and muscle weakness. NIS score ranged from 0 to 244, with higher score indicating greater disability or impairment. The rate of change was calculated from last follow-up.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Change in NIS-LL for ATTRwt
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
NIS-LL (Neuropathy Impairment Score Lower Limbs) was clinically important, sensitive measure of neurological function in individuals, assessing sensory function, reflexes, and muscle weakness of the lower limbo. NÍS-LL assessed muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation. Each item scored separately for left and right limbs. Components of muscle weakness:0(normal) to4(paralysis), higher score=more weakness; reflexes, sensation:0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Total NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=more impairment. The rate of change was calculated from last follow-up.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Change in Norfolk QOL-DN for ATTRwt
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Norfolk Quality of Life Questionnaire for Diabetic Neuropathy was a standardized and validated instrument that assesses the effect of polyneuropathy on the functionality and quality of life of the individual. Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy; Item 1 to 7: related to symptoms and presence of symptom was assessed as 1 and absence was assessed as 0. Item 8-35: related to activities of daily living and scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0= no problem and 4= severe problem (except item 32, where -2= much better, 0=about the same, 2=much worse). TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -4 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Change in COMPASS-31 for ATTRwt
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after treatment initiation
COMPASS-31 (Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31) was a questionnaire designed to assess the severity and functional ability in participants with autonomic dysfunction. COMPASS-31 total score ranged from 0 to 100; where 0=Lesser severity of dysautonomia and 100=Greater severity of dysautonomia.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after treatment initiation
Change in FAP-RODs for ATTRwt
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
FAP-RODS is a questionnaire that assessed the effect of neuropathy on daily activities. FAP-RODS total score ranged from 0 to 68; where, 0=Lower ability to perform daily activities and 68=Greater ability to perform daily activities.
Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants According to FAP Stage for ATTRwt
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 months after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
FAP stage is a staging system based on symptom severity and disease progression. FAP stages included: Asymptomatic; Free ambulation (Walking without support): stage 1; Supportive ambulation (Walking with support): stage 2; Wheelchair-bound or bedridden: stage 3.
Month 18, 24 and 30 months after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Percentage of Participants Who do Not Have Stage Progression in the PND Score for ATTRwt
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 30 (data collected and analysed over 22 days)
PND was a simple staging system according to the degree of neuropathic dysfunction and its impact on ambulation. PND stages included: Asymptomatic: I Sensory disturbances, normal gait: II Sensory disturbances, altered gait not requiring support: IIIA Gait requiring one support: IIIB Gait requiring two supports: IV Wheelchair or bedside). Participants who did not change to higher stages compared to the start of treatment was reported as Unchanged and those who progressed to higher stages were reported under Staging up.
From Baseline to Month 30 (data collected and analysed over 22 days)
Percentage of Responders to Treatment for ATTRwt
Time Frame: Month 12 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Percentage of responders to treatment was defined as participants who achieved the change from baseline of less than 4 points in the NIS and participants who achieved the change from baseline of less than 2 points in the NIS-LL were reported in this outcome measure.
Month 12 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants With R-R Interval Variability for ATTRwt
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of participants with R-R interval variability (altered/unaltered) was reported in this outcome measure.
Month 18, 24 and 30 (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
mBMI for ATTRwt
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 after start of treatment (data collected and analysed over 22 days)
BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared and measured as kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2).
Month 18, 24 and 30 after start of treatment (data collected and analysed over 22 days)
Ulnar/Sural SNAP Score for ATTRwt
Time Frame: Month 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude (in microvolts) was measured using electromyography of the left lower limb.
Month 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Ulnar/Peroneal CMAP Score for ATTRwt
Time Frame: Month 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Peroneal motor nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude (in millivolts) was measured using electromyography of the left lower limb.
Month 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Time Frame: At baseline (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of participants with carpal tunnel syndrome were reported in this outcome measure.
At baseline (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants With Lumbar Stenosis
Time Frame: At baseline (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of participants with lumbar stenosis were reported in this outcome measure.
At baseline (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants With Gastrointestinal Disturbances
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of participants with gastrointestinal disturbances were reported in this outcome measure.
Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants With Unintentional Weight Loss
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of participants with unintentional weight loss were reported in this outcome measure.
Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants With Urological Disturbances
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of participants with urological disturbances were reported in this outcome measure.
Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants With Ophthalmological Disturbances
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of participants with ophthalmological disturbances were reported in this outcome measure.
Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Disturbances
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of participants with CNS disturbances were reported in this outcome measure.
Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants With Symptoms of Autonomic Neuropathy
Time Frame: Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of participants with symptoms of autonomic neuropathy including impaired sweating, sexual dysfunction, orthostatic hypotension were reported in this outcome measure.
Month 18, 24 and 30 after the start of treatment (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of Participants With Symptoms of Peripheral Neuropathy
Time Frame: At baseline (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)
Number of participants with symptoms of peripheral neuropathy (allodynia and paresthesia) were reported in this outcome measure.
At baseline (data collected and analyzed over 22 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 24, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Polyneuropathy

Clinical Trials on Tafamidis

Subscribe