The Effect of Vitamin D3 on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement

April 7, 2021 updated by: Mushriq F. Abid, University of Baghdad

The Effect of Vitamin D3 on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement (Conventional and Accelerated): Clinical Trial

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of vitamin D3 deficiency on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in both conventional and accelerated orthodontic. Assessing both lower anterior teeth alignment and the rate of maxillary canine retraction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

To evaluate the effect of vitamin D deficiency on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in both conventional and accelerated orthodontic, additionally find the effect of vitamin D deficiency on molar anchorage loss, canine rotation, lower incisor crowding alignment time, pain experienced by the patient during OTM and rate of orthodontically induce apical root resorption.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Al-Rusafa
      • Baghdad, Al-Rusafa, Iraq
        • College of Dentisry-University of Baghdad

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ranged from 18 to 30 years, from both sex.
  2. Healthy general medical condition, healthy periodontal condition.
  3. Malocclusion that requires extraction of the maxillary first premolars, followed by canine retraction, with moderate lower incisor crowding (Little's irregularity index 3-6mm).
  4. Normal shape and structure of maxillary canine, with no history of filling or root canal treatment and normal shape and structure of maxillary first molar.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant women.
  2. Patient with renal or liver disease.
  3. Patient taking corticosteroid or anticonvulsant drugs.
  4. Patient with thyroid or parathyroid problems.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Normal vitamin D
Include patients with normal vitamin D level (above 30ng/ml). Vitamin D level will be measured at the beginning of treatment if there is deficiency then the patient refer to specialized physician to be supplied with vitamin D supplement to optimized the level to normal then start orthodontic treatment
Micro-osteoperforation Mini-implant facilitated micro-osteoperforation (MOPs) were placed in the experimental side before canine retraction. Three MOPs were placed distal to canine on experimental sides in all group.
Other Names:
  • MOP
EXPERIMENTAL: Vitamin D deficiency
Include patients with unknown vitamin D level until time of canine retraction where we measure level if deficiency exist (below 30ng/ml) then the patient will be referred to specialized physician to be supplied with vitamin D supplement.
Micro-osteoperforation Mini-implant facilitated micro-osteoperforation (MOPs) were placed in the experimental side before canine retraction. Three MOPs were placed distal to canine on experimental sides in all group.
Other Names:
  • MOP
EXPERIMENTAL: Control
includes patients with unknown vitamin D level until the completion of canine retraction where we measure level. If deficiency exists (below 30ng/ml) then we will refer the patient to specialized physician to be supplied with vitamin D supplement
Micro-osteoperforation Mini-implant facilitated micro-osteoperforation (MOPs) were placed in the experimental side before canine retraction. Three MOPs were placed distal to canine on experimental sides in all group.
Other Names:
  • MOP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Canine retraction rate
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Maxillary study model will be 3D scan using optical 3D scanner(Smart Optic,Germany) then measurement done on digital model using 3D program( DentalCad,Galway,3.0,2021),to measure distance from tip of canine to 3rd palatal raguea on both side
4 weeks
Canine retraction rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Maxillary study model will be 3D scan using optical 3D scanner(Smart Optic,Germany) then measurement done on digital model using 3D program( DentalCad,Galway,3.0,2021),to measure distance from tip of canine to 3rd palatal raguea on both side
8 weeks
Canine retraction rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Maxillary study model will be 3D scan using optical 3D scanner(Smart Optic,Germany) then measurement done on digital model using 3D program( DentalCad,Galway,3.0,2021),to measure distance from tip of canine to 3rd palatal raguea on both side
12 weeks
Canine retraction rate
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Maxillary study model will be 3D scan using optical 3D scanner(Smart Optic,Germany) then measurement done on digital model using 3D program( DentalCad,Galway,3.0,2021),to measure distance from tip of canine to 3rd palatal raguea on both side
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alignment efficiency
Time Frame: 4 weeks
3D scanned study models were used to measure the amount of crowding in the mandibular anterior teeth using 3Dprogram (DentalCad,Galway,3.0,2021). If Little's irregularity index is less than 1mm and alignment improvement not above 0.5 mm between two successive visits, then treatment is regarded as finished.
4 weeks
Alignment efficiency
Time Frame: 8 weeks
3D scanned study models were used to measure the amount of crowding in the mandibular anterior teeth using 3Dprogram (DentalCad,Galway,3.0,2021). If Little's irregularity index is less than 1mm and alignment improvement not above 0.5 mm between two successive visits, then treatment is regarded as finished.
8 weeks
Alignment efficiency
Time Frame: 12 weeks
3D scanned study models were used to measure the amount of crowding in the mandibular anterior teeth using 3Dprogram (DentalCad,Galway,3.0,2021). If Little's irregularity index is less than 1mm and alignment improvement not above 0.5 mm between two successive visits, then treatment is regarded as finished.
12 weeks
Root resorption
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The amount of root resorption was measured at the start of treatment and after 12 weeks, the length of the root was recoded at these time intervals. Radiographic films were positioned using a customized sensor holder for the lower anterior teeth with a 7cm film-cone distance using long cone paralleling technique. The radiographs were made at 70kV and 8mA DC with an exposure of 0.25 seconds.
12 weeks
pain perception
Time Frame: 7 days

Evaluations of pain/discomfort was made in the evening on a daily basis over the first 7 days after bonding using a 10- point visual analog scale (VAS) of 10cm length. The highest pain level experienced should be reported by each patient.

The recording sheet was received by all the patients on the day of bonding, it included seven visual analog scales (one for each day) and the patients were given oral instructions on how to finish the VAS by marking the point on the line which supposed to represent the maximum pain that they felt per day, with 0 refers to "no pain" and 10 refers to "intolerable pain". Patients were reminded daily by a phone call or a text message to mark the recording sheet and to bring it on their next appointment

7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mushriq Abid, MSc, PhD, University of Baghdad

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 23, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 2, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 178420

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Position Anomalies

Clinical Trials on Micro-osteoperforation

3
Subscribe