FACE for Children With Rare Diseases (FACE-Rare)

February 20, 2024 updated by: Maureen Lyon, Children's National Research Institute

Palliative Care Needs of Children With Rare Diseases and Their Families

Children with ultra-rare or complex rare diseases are routinely excluded from research studies because of their conditions, creating a health disparity. However, new statistical techniques make it possible to study small samples of heterogeneous populations. We propose to study the palliative care needs of family caregivers of children with ultra-rare diseases and to pilot test a palliative care needs assessment and advance care planning intervention to facilitate discussions about the future medical care choices families are likely to be asked to make for their child.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

A rare disease is a condition affecting fewer than 200,000 persons. Pediatric patients with rare diseases experience high mortality with 30% not living to see their 5th birthday. Families are likely to be asked to make complex medical decisions for their child. Pediatric advance care planning involves preparation and skill development to help make future medical care choices. Children with rare disorders are a heterogeneous group often with co-morbidities, resulting in their exclusion from research, thereby creating a health disparity for this vulnerable population. Available research on families of children with rare diseases lacks scientific rigor. Although desperately needed, there are few empirically validated interventions to address these issues. We propose to close a gap in our knowledge of families' needs for support in a heterogeneous group of children with rare diseases; and to test an advance care planning intervention.

The FAmily CEntered (FACE) pediatric advance care planning intervention, proven successful with cancer and HIV, is adapted to families with children who have rare diseases. Theoretically informed and developed by the PI, Dr. Lyon, and colleagues, the proposed intervention will use Respecting Choices Next Steps Pediatric Advance Care Planning™ for families whose child is unable to participate in health care decision-making. Our consultation with families of children with rare disorders and the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) revealed that basic palliative care needs should be addressed first, before an advance care planning intervention. For the study to be able to meet this request, all families randomized to the intervention will first complete the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT)© which our investigative team adapted for use in pediatrics. In the CSNAT Approach, facilitators assess caregivers' prioritized palliative care needs and develop Shared Action Plans for palliative care support. Thus, we propose an innovative 3-session FACE-Rare intervention, integrating two evidence-based approaches. We will evaluate FACE-Rare using a scientifically rigorous intent-to-treat, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial design. Family/child pairs or dyads (N=30 dyads) will be randomized to FACE-Rare (CSNAT Sessions 1 & 2 plus Respecting Choices Sessions 3) or control (Treatment As Usual) groups. Both groups will receive palliative care information. All families will complete questionnaires at baseline and 3-months follow-up. Investigators will evaluate the initial efficacy of FACE-Rare on family quality of life (psychological, spiritual). We will estimate how religiousness and caregiver appraisal influence families' quality of life. We will also explore health care utilization by the children during the study and family satisfaction.

If the aims of this pilot trial are achieved, a future, large, multi-site trial will test the full theoretical model to improve care for children with rare diseases and their families through family engaged pediatric Advance Care Planning. The ultimate goal is to minimize suffering and enhance the quality of life of family caregivers of children with rare diseases; and through this process to improve the palliative care of their children.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Children's National Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 99 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Child inclusion criteria are

  1. ≥1.0 years and <18.0 years at enrollment;e
  2. unable to participate in end-of-life care decision-making;
  3. have a rare disease as operationally defined (See Human Subjects);
  4. not under a Do Not Resuscitate Order or Allow a Natural Death Order; and
  5. not in the Intensive Care Unit.

Family caregiver inclusion criteria are:

  1. ≥ 18.0 years at enrollment;
  2. legal guardian of child and child's caregiver;
  3. can speak and understand English; and
  4. not known to be developmentally delayed.

Exclusion Criteria:

(1) Family caregiver is actively homicidal, suicidal, or psychotic at the time of enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FACE-Rare Intervention

FACE-Rare is a behavioral intervention that combines the CSNAT Pediatric Approach and the Respecting Choices® Next Steps ACP over 3 sessions.

Sessions 1&2: CSNAT is an evidence-based process of family caregiver assessment and support in specialized medical (palliative) care. The CSNAT tool is structured around 16 categories of family caregiver support. With the goal to decrease caregiver burden, this process consists of 5 stages wherein a nurse or practitioner works with the caregiver to create a shared support plan for the child.

Session 3: Respecting Choices® Next Steps- This advanced care planning (pACP) conversation engages families in a process for how to make future medical decisions consistent with their goals and values. The interview is structured in 6 stages to achieve 2 main goals: to facilitate conversations with the family about their child's medical condition, history, fears, values, beliefs, and hopes; and to set the stage for the family's future healthcare decisions.

The (approximately) weekly 3-session FACE-Rare intervention of approximately 45-60 minutes each is comprised of the CSNAT approach [Sessions 1 & 2] and Respecting Choices [Session 3].
Other Names:
  • FACE-Rare Intervention
No Intervention: Treatment-as-Usual (TAU) Control
To minimize the burden to families, we have chosen a Treatment-as-Usual (TAU) comparison condition, where patients will receive their normal standard of care. Both study arms will receive palliative (specialized medical) care information at enrollment and complete questionnaires before and after the intervention or TAU period. Current practice for minors with life-limiting illnesses is to defer initial discussions of advanced care planning (pACP) until a medical crisis, so this is what the TAU control arm condition will consist of.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Anxiety at 3 Months Post-Enrollment
Quality of life: emotional health. 21 items. Higher scores mean more depressive symptoms. Total score will be used in analysis. Scores range from 0-63.
Change from Baseline Anxiety at 3 Months Post-Enrollment
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)- Spiritual Well-Being Scale, version 4
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Spiritual Well-Being at 3 Months Post-Enrollment
Quality of life: spiritual (meaning/purpose, peace). Is culturally sensitive to those with non-theistic beliefs. 23 items. Total Score will be used in analysis. Higher scores mean higher spirituality. Scores range from 0-115.
Change from Baseline Spiritual Well-Being at 3 Months Post-Enrollment
Advance Care Document for Children with Rare Diseases
Time Frame: Change from Baseline ACP Documentation at 12 weejs Post-Enrollment
Advanced Care Planning (ACP) Documentation in Electronic Health Records (EHR) & Decisional preferences. Score will be present in EHR or absent from EHR. Evidence of any advance care document (yes/no) will count.
Change from Baseline ACP Documentation at 12 weejs Post-Enrollment
Initiation of Palliative Care Consultations
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Frequency at 12 weejs Post-Enrollment
Used to standardize child healthcare utilization from data abstraction based on retrospective medical chart review. Score will be present in EHR or absent from EHR. Evidence of consultation with the Palliative Care Team (yes/no) will count.
Change from Baseline Frequency at 12 weejs Post-Enrollment
Days in Palliative Care Prior to Death
Time Frame: 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Score is number of days patient was enrolled in a palliative care program in the 30 days prior to death. Applicable only to patients who have deceased since study enrollment. Used to standardize child healthcare utilization from data abstraction based on retrospective medical chart review. Minimum value is 0 with no maximum. Higher score indicates higher level of healthcare utilization.
12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Hospitalizations
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Frequency at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Used to standardize child healthcare utilization from data abstraction based on retrospective medical chart review. Score is recorded number of inpatient hospital admissions for clinical treatment. Minimum value is 0 with no maximum. Higher score indicates higher level of healthcare utilization.
Change from Baseline Frequency at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Emergency Department (ED) Visits
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Frequency at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Used to standardize child healthcare utilization from data abstraction based on retrospective medical chart review. Score is reported number of ED visits. Minimum value is 0 with no maximum. Higher score indicates higher level of healthcare utilization.
Change from Baseline Frequency at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Use
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Frequency at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Used to standardize child healthcare utilization from data abstraction based on retrospective medical chart review. Score is number of times the patient was admitted to the ICU (including the NICU and PICU). Minimum value is 0 with no maximum. Higher score indicates higher level of healthcare utilization.
Change from Baseline Frequency at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Surgeries
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Frequency at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Used to standardize child healthcare utilization from data abstraction based on retrospective medical chart review. Score is number of surgical procedures the patient has undergone. Minimum value is 0 with no maximum. Higher score indicates higher level of healthcare utilization.
Change from Baseline Frequency at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Place of Death
Time Frame: 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Location where the patient was pronounced dead, as reported in their EMR. Applicable only to patients who have deceased since study enrollment. Categories are Inpatient hospice setting, Home with hospice, Home without hospice, Hospital ICU, Hospital-Not ICU, Other, or Unknown. Used to standardize child healthcare utilization from data abstraction based on retrospective medical chart review.
12 weeks Post-Enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief-Multidimensional Measure of Religion and Spirituality
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Religiousness/Spirituality at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Religious Coping: 5 items from our previous research: attend religious services, feel God's presence, pray privately, identify as religious, identify as spiritual. 5 items scored on 5-point likert-scale. Range of scores from 0-25. Higher scores indicate higher levels of religiousness/spirituality.
Change from Baseline Religiousness/Spirituality at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Family Appraisal of Caregiving Questionnaire for Palliative Care
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Appraisal of Caregiving at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment
Caregiver appraisal: caregiver strain, positive caregiving appraisals, caregiver distress, family well-being in past two weeks. 25 items. 5 point Likert scale. Scores range from 0-125. Two scales are reversed scored to yield higher total score equals higher positive family appraisal of caregiving. We will also examine subscale scores--higher scores indicate higher level of that construct.
Change from Baseline Appraisal of Caregiving at 12 weeks Post-Enrollment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 5 Weeks Post-Baseline
Study-specific process measure to assess adverse events and benefit/burden of participation. 12 items. Possible scores range from 13-65, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with study participation.
Up to 5 Weeks Post-Baseline
Hickman Role Stress Decisional Burden Scale
Time Frame: Up to 5 Weeks Post-Enrollment
Visual analogue scale 0-100. "How stressful is it for you to make medical decisions for your child?" 1 item. Higher score means more stress, lower scores mean less stress.
Up to 5 Weeks Post-Enrollment
Quality of Communication Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 5 Weeks Post-Baseline
Process measure to assess how participating families rated the interviewer's quality of communication and overall discussion. 5 items. 5 point Likert scale. Possible scores range from 0-25, where higher scores indicate better perception of communication.
Up to 5 Weeks Post-Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maureen E Lyon, PhD, Children's National Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The proposed research will include data from 30 children living with rare diseases who are unable to participate in their own medical care decision-making and their 30 family caregivers. The final dataset will be stripped of individual-level identifiable data prior to release for sharing. Given the vulnerable nature of the subjects (child participants), we will make the data and associated documentation available to researchers under a data-sharing agreement that includes:

  1. appropriate human-subjects review and approval; and
  2. a commitment to use the data only for research purposes and that no attempt will be made to identify individual participants.

The Biostatistics group will perform the mechanics of de-identification and provide the data in an agreed-upon format. De-identification will include stripping the data of PHI; removing dates or adding a random offset to the dates. Only de-identified group data will be shared. This protects participant confidentiality.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rare Diseases

Clinical Trials on FAmily CEntered (FACE) pACP Intervention

3
Subscribe