Cultivating Resilience in Oncology Practice (CROP)

May 20, 2021 updated by: Oskar Lundgren, Linkoeping University

Cultivating Resilience in Oncology Practice: A Feasibility Study of Pediatric Patients

The purpose of the CROP study is to investigate the potential to cultivate psychological resources and resilience in childhood cancer patients and their family members using a mobile phone-based intervention.

The feasibility study aims to evaluate the implementation and participant experience of the digital intervention and register psychological outcome measures preliminary evidence for its acceptability, feasibility, and potential beneficial effects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The feasibility study (CROP) will recruit 20 youths with newly diagnosed cancer (10-18 y) and family members for participation in a 12-week digital intervention to cultivate psychological resources.

Investigators will recruit an equal number of pediatric patients with other chronic conditions to an observational comparison group to indicate the influences on participation and outcome from the oncology care context.

Investigators will obtain informed consent from all participants. Upon inclusion in the study, participants will start getting a text message every day for 12 consecutive weeks. The texts will contain links to a digital platform on which participants will complete an exercise in either self-reflection or guided mindfulness meditation.

The psychological training program is based on 12 modules with evidence-based treatments in other medical contexts and age groups. The practices are based on acceptance, commitment, re-appraisal, meaning and purpose, expressive writing, narrative processes, mindfulness, compassion, equanimity, and gratitude. The combination of practices and the implementation in pediatric oncology has not been studied earlier.

The cancer patients will be recruited during the first month after diagnosis, meet with an instructor during 2-4 start-up meetings, and thereafter practice on their own or with participating family members.

The pediatric patients with chronic diseases will be recruited during a follow-up visit to an out-patient clinic and meet with an instructor during 2-4 start-up meetings, and thereafter practice on their own or together with participating family members.

Investigators will address the primary research question of the feasibility of the intervention by investigating participant activity data, written evaluations of the experience of participation, and through phone interviews of participants.

Secondary research questions, such as preliminary data on changes in mental health and psychological distress, will be investigated with self-report questionnaires.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Linköping, Sweden, 58183
        • H.K.H. Crown Princess Victoria Children's Hospital, Linköping University Hospital, Sweden
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed cancer
  • Chronic pediatric disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe crisis reaction
  • Late-stage palliative care
  • Severe intellectual disability
  • Psychiatric disease hindrance
  • Participation in other study with psychological intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cancer patients
Youths (10-18 y) with newly diagnosed cancer, as well as their family members.
12 week of daily reflection and meditation exercises, delivered by mobile phone text messages, after 3-4 live introduction sessions.
Active Comparator: Pediatric patients
Youths (10-18 y) with a chronic somatic disease receiving care at a pediatric outpatient facility.
12 week of daily reflection and meditation exercises, delivered by mobile phone text messages, after 3-4 live introduction sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: At the beginning of the trial.
14 items. Score (min-max): 0-70. A high score indicates mental well-being.
At the beginning of the trial.
Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: After 12 weeks of participation in the trial.
14 items. Score (min-max): 0-70. A high score indicates mental well-being.
After 12 weeks of participation in the trial.
Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: At 12-month after completion of the trial.
14 items. Score (min-max): 0-70. A high score indicates mental well-being.
At 12-month after completion of the trial.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Time Frame: At the beginning of the trial.
25 items. Score (min-max): 0-25. A high score indicates psychiatric difficulties.
At the beginning of the trial.
Strenghs and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Time Frame: After 12 weeks of participation in the trial.
25 items. Score (min-max): 0-25. A high score indicates psychiatric difficulties.
After 12 weeks of participation in the trial.
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Time Frame: At 12-month after completion of the trial.
25 items. Score (min-max): 0-25. A high score indicate psychiatric difficulties.
At 12-month after completion of the trial.
Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale Short form (RCADS-SF)
Time Frame: At the beginning of the trial.
25 items. Score (min-max): 0-75. A high score indicates symptoms of anxiety and depression.
At the beginning of the trial.
Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)
Time Frame: After 12 weeks of participation in the trial.
25 items. Score (min-max): 0-75. A high score indicates symptoms of anxiety and depression.
After 12 weeks of participation in the trial.
Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)
Time Frame: At 12-month after completion of the trial.
25 items. Score (min-max): 0-75. A high score indicates symptoms of anxiety and depression.
At 12-month after completion of the trial.
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: After completion of the 12 week trial.
10 items. Score (min-max): 10-50. A high score indicates a high level of usability.
After completion of the 12 week trial.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Catrin Furuhjelm, MD, PhD, Region Östergötland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 31, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 2, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-01044

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Study data will be made available upon reasonable request from other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Awareness and insight Modules (AiM)

3
Subscribe