Longitudinal Investigation of Cancer-related Fatigue and Its Treatment (LIFT Project)

November 24, 2022 updated by: German Cancer Research Center
The LIFT project aims to thoroughly investigate the current status of health care in Germany regarding cancer-related fatigue from the institutional, professionals' and patients' perspective.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The LIFT project aims to thoroughly investigate the current status of health care in Germany regarding fatigue from the institutional, professionals', and patients' perspective. With a multimodal approach including a comprehensive assessment of fatigue management and support offered by different institutions (uncertified hospitals, uncertified oncological practices, counselling units, certified cancer centers; n=350), a survey and qualitative interviews among practicing physicians ("Niedergelassene Ärzte"), hospital physicians, practicing psychotherapists with psycho-oncological focus, psycho-oncologists at hospitals, nurses at certified cancer centers and nurses at other hospitals (n=420), and a longitudinal clinical study among cancer patients (n=1400) as well as two focus groups with patient representatives (each n=6), the characteristics, patterns, and potential effects or shortcomings of the current fatigue management will be investigated. Furthermore, factors associated with patients' and health care professionals' knowledge about fatigue will be examined.

Concerning the longitudinal clinical study assessing the patients' perspective, online or paper-based questionnaires on socio-demographic, clinical and patient reported outcomes will be sent to the patients 6,9,12 and 24 months after diagnosis. Moreover, detailed data on screening, diagnosis and counseling as well as therapies offered and administered to reduce fatigue will be surveyed, as well as the patients' state of knowledge, perception and prevailing needs regarding fatigue. Tumor and cancer therapy data will be extracted from the Epidemiological Cancer Registry.

The results of the LIFT project shall provide a basis to identify and overcome shortcomings in the actual fatigue management in Germany, and, to eventually ameliorate this severe burden in cancer patients and survivors.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients newly diagnosed with colon, rectum, liver, pancreas or lung cancer, malignant melanoma, breast or other gynecological cancers, prostate, kidney, bladder or thyroid gland cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma or leukemia.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Newly diagnosed with a primary tumor of one of the following malignant neoplasms: colon (C18), rectum (C19-20), liver (C22), pancreas (C25), lung (C33-34), malignant melanoma (C43), breast (C50, only female), cervix (C53), endometrium (C54.1), ovaries (C56), prostate (C61), kidney (C64), bladder (C67), thyroid gland (C73), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (C82-88), leukemia (C91-C95)
  • Having received or receiving at enrolment at least one of the following treatments: chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, targeted or immune therapy
  • Able to understand and follow the study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Carcinoma in situ
  • Any additional malignant or unclear neoplasm before or since time of diagnosis of the considered primary tumor, except unspecified neoplasm of skin (C44)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
patient cohort
Newly diagnosed patients with colon, rectum, liver, pancreas or lung cancer, malignant melanoma, breast or other gynecological cancers, prostate, kidney, bladder or thyroid gland cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma or leukemia recruited approximately 6 months after diagnosis and followed up to 2 years post-diagnosis. No intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue severity
Time Frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
assessed by EORTC QLQ-FA12 (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Fatigue Questionnaire). The items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) with higher scores meaning a higher level of fatigue.
6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Impact of fatigue
Time Frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
assessed by the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). The BFI consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine) with higher scores signifying higher intensity and impairment.
6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
State of fatigue management
Time Frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Questionnaire assessing the adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines regarding management of cancer-related fatigue.
6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding cancer-related fatigue
Time Frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding cancer-related fatigue. The knowledge score consists of fatigue-related statements that should be rated as either right, wrong, or "dont know". The attitudes scale is composed of statements that should be rated on a 4-point likert scale. Higher scores indicate a greater agreement to the particular statement.
6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life functions and symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 and 5 additional items derived according to the EORTC scoring manual assessing symptoms of fever, hot flashes, night sweat, polyneuropathy and distress of dependents caused by the diagnosis are added. The items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). A higher score corresponds to a higher level of symptoms/problems.
6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Sleep problems
Time Frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI consists of open and closed questions regarding characteristics of sleep and sleep quality. Some items are rated on a 4-point likert scale with higher scores meaning more sleep problems.
6 months after diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis
Depression
Time Frame: 6 months after diagnosis to 24 months post-diagnosis
assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (most of the time). A sum score is calculated, with higher scores meaning a higher level of depressive symptoms.
6 months after diagnosis to 24 months post-diagnosis
Body mass index
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
calculated from weight and height
6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
Total physical activity
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
assessed by a questionnaire regarding walking, cycling and exercise behavior
6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
Return to work
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
assessed by questions regarding occupational issues
6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-diagnosis
Anxiety
Time Frame: assessed 6 months after diagnosis to 24 months after diagnosis
assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). The items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (most of the time). A sum score (ranging from 0 to 21) is calculated, with higher scores meaning a higher level of symptomatology.
assessed 6 months after diagnosis to 24 months after diagnosis
Supportive Care Needs
Time Frame: assessed at t2 9 months post-diagnosis
assessed by the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF-34). The scale ranges from 1 (not applicable) to 5 (high need) with higher scores meaning a higher need of support.
assessed at t2 9 months post-diagnosis
Social Support
Time Frame: at t1 (6 months post-diagnosis) and t3 (12 months post-diagnosis)
assessed by the Illness-specific Social Support Scale (ISSS, German Version) among cancer patients. The 8 items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Sum scores for the items 1,3,6 and 8 (positive support) as well as for the items 2,4,5 and 7 (detrimental interaction) are calculated with higher scores meaning higher levels of positive support and detrimental interaction respectively.
at t1 (6 months post-diagnosis) and t3 (12 months post-diagnosis)
Loneliness
Time Frame: at t1 (6 months post-diagnosis) and t4 (24 months post-diagnosis)
assessed by three items of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)-loneliness-scale. The response categories are 1 (hardly ever), 2 (some of the time) and 3(often). A sum score is calculated with higher scores meaning a higher level of loneliness.
at t1 (6 months post-diagnosis) and t4 (24 months post-diagnosis)
Resilience
Time Frame: assessed at t1 6 months post-diagnosis
assessed by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). The six items are rated on a 5-point Likert-scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). After reversing the coding of inverted items 2,4 and 6, the mean of the six items is calculated with higher scores meaning a higher level of resilience.
assessed at t1 6 months post-diagnosis
Patient Activation
Time Frame: at t2 (9 months post-diagnosis)
assessed by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13). Patients are supposed to rate their level of agreement to 13 statements on a 4-point-scale. A higher score corresponds to a higher level of patient activation.
at t2 (9 months post-diagnosis)
Posttraumatic growth
Time Frame: at t4 (24 months post-diagnosis)
assessed by Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). The items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very strongly) with higher scores indicating a higher level of posttraumatic growth.
at t4 (24 months post-diagnosis)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen Steindorf, Prof. Dr., German Cancer Research Center, Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer
  • Principal Investigator: Martina E. Schmidt, Dr., German Cancer Research Center, Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer
  • Principal Investigator: Imad Maatouk, Prof. Dr., Psychosomatics, Psychotherapy and Psycho-Oncology, Medical Hospital II, University Hospital Wuerzburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 20, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 31, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LIFT project

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer-related Fatigue

3
Subscribe