Tailored Exercise Interventions to Reduce Fatigue in Cancer Survivors

October 8, 2021 updated by: Guillaume Millet, University of Calgary
Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and distressing symptom of cancer and/or cancer treatment that can persist for months or years in cancer survivors. Exercise is beneficial for the management of CRF, and general exercise guidelines for cancer survivors are available. However, exercise interventions have not been tailored to alleviate CRF in fatigued cancer survivors, and thus the potential to alleviate CRF may not have been realized. The primary aim of this research is to investigate the effect of a traditional vs. tailored 12-week exercise intervention on self-reported CRF severity.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Background and Rationale

Approximately one-third of cancer survivors experience severe and persistent fatigue for a number of years post-treatment, but this distressing symptom is often under-treated by healthcare professionals due to a lack of mechanism-targeted interventions. The assessment of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is reliant on subjective fatigue measurements such as self-report questionnaires. Less attention has been given to objective physiological measurements. However, there are well-established techniques which allow the assessment of neuromuscular fatigue and its peripheral and central origins which could be utilized in the study of CRF. Very few studies have considered these objective measures alongside self-report scales in the study of CRF and only two have used such techniques in cancer survivors. To date, no studies have investigated neuromuscular fatigue in whole body, dynamic activity as relevant to daily tasks (and involving the lower limb due to its functional relevance to locomotion). Novel testing developed in our laboratory could be used as part of a wider screening to develop individualized interventions to alleviate CRF. It is well accepted in the field that CRF is multidimensional and in addition to a potential neuromuscular component, the role of sleep disturbance may also be implicated. Interventions targeted at improving sleep quality are therefore warranted, and there is sound evidence for the efficacy of exercise interventions in particular for improving CRF in cancer survivors. As a non-pharmacological intervention, physical activity has the strongest evidence base for treating CRF. However, the mechanisms explaining the reduction of CRF with exercise are not understood. Due to the complex and multi-factorial nature of CRF, it would be of benefit to tailor exercise interventions to the specific deficits (in regards to neuromuscular mechanisms) or difficulties (for example sleep disturbance) experienced by the individual. Ultimately, mechanism-targeted exercise interventions could be translated to clinical rehabilitation programs and lead to an improved quality of for cancer survivors.

Research Question & Objectives

The primary aim of this research is to investigate the effect of a traditional vs. tailored 12-week exercise intervention on self-reported CRF severity.

Methods

Fatigued cancer survivors who have completed primary treatment ≥ 3 months and ≤ 5 years from enrollment will be randomly allocated to one of two treatment arms: traditional (active control) and tailored exercise. Participants in the traditional exercise group will engage in aerobic and resistance exercise that is consistent with published recommendations. The tailored exercise group will be prescribed an intervention designed to address individual deficits (identified at baseline) that may be related to CRF. Participants will be assessed before and after the intervention for patient-reported outcomes, neuromuscular function and fatigue in response to whole-body exercise, sleep quantity and quality, physical activity levels, cardiorespiratory fitness and blood biomarkers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4
        • University of Calgary

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 18 and 75 years;
  • Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) score ≤ 34;
  • Completion of treatment in ≥ 3 months and ≤ 5 years preceding enrollment;
  • Approval received from personal physician and/or a Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology-Clinical Exercise Physiologist (CSEP-CEP);
  • Command of the English language.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to experimental procedures including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS);
  • Diagnosed as having obstructive sleep apnea or anemia;
  • Currently participating in a structured exercise intervention;
  • Participant is pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional Exercise
A classical exercise intervention based on current guidelines for cancer survivors.
The traditional exercise group will undertake a supervised exercise intervention involving aerobic exercise and light resistance training, in line with published guidelines for exercise in cancer survivors.
Experimental: Tailored Exercise
A tailored and individualized exercise intervention based on the results of pre-intervention testing.
The tailored training group will be prescribed an individualized exercise intervention designed specifically to counteract deficits (e.g. neuromuscular) of difficulties (e.g. sleep disturbance) identified during pre-intervention testing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of change in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to after the 12-week intervention, at 6 month and 12 month follow up.
Self-report questionnaire for the assessment of cancer-related fatigue.
Baseline to after the 12-week intervention, at 6 month and 12 month follow up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of change in The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G)
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
General quality of life instrument intended for use with a variety of chronic illness conditions.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Assessment of change in Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised tiredness scale
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention, and during follow up (6 and 12 months).
Self-report questionnaire for the assessment of of nine common symptoms experienced by cancer patients.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention, and during follow up (6 and 12 months).
Maximal Isometric Force in the Knee Extensors
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
A reduction in maximal isometric force in the knee extensors measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Cortical Voluntary Activation
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
A reduction voluntary activation (using transcranial magnetic stimulation) measured measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Voluntary Activation
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
A reduction voluntary activation (using femoral nerve stimulation) measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Potentiated Doublet Twitch Force
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
A reduction in potentiated quadriceps twitch force (from a high frequency doublet at 100 Hz) measured before, before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Muscle Compound Action Potential (M-Wave) Peak-to Peak Amplitude
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Evoked from supra-maximal stimulation of the femoral nerve and measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Muscle Compound Action Potential (M-Wave) Peak-to Peak Duration
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Evoked from supra-maximal stimulation of the femoral nerve and measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Muscle Compound Action Potential (M-Wave) Area
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Evoked from supra-maximal stimulation of the femoral nerve and measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Peak-to Peak Amplitude
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Normalized to the maximal M-wave and measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Peak-to Peak Duration
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Normalized to the maximal M-wave and measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Area
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Normalized to the maximal M-wave and measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Cortical Silent Period
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Evoked from TMS and measured (from stimulation artifact to the continuous resumption of EMG) before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Voluntary Electromyography (EMG)
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Root mean square of the EMG signal during an MVC, measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Amplitude of the Sleep-Wake Cycle
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
The mean difference between lowest and highest activity period, recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Peak Time of the sleep-wake Cycle
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Time of day of the highest estimated level of wake, recorded by actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Mesor of the Sleep-Wake Cycle
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Mean level of activity over 24 hours, recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
inter-daily stability
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
the degree of regularity of the rest-activity patterns on individual days in the 24 h environment, recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
intra-daily variability
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
the fragmentation of periods of rest and activity, recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
L5
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
The mean activity counts in the least active 5 h period in the average 24 h pattern) recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
L5 mid
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
The central time of the L5 period, usually referring to the through of the activity period), recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Wake actigraphy
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Amount of activity during wake, recorded with actigraphy
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Sleep Activity
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Amount of activity during sleep periods, recorded with actigraphy
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Activity Index
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Percentage of activity per epoch for wake and sleep, recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Time in bed
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Time spent between the moment subject turn off the light to sleep and the moment he gets up, recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Actual Sleep Time
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Time spent asleep during the night, recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Actual Wake Time
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Time spent awaken during the night, recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Sleep Onset Latency
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Time to fall asleep, recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Sleep Efficiency
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Ratio between the time spent asleep and the total duration of sleep period, recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Fragmentation index
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Indication of the sleep quality based on movement during night, recorded with actigraphy.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Blood Biomarkers
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Blood count, catecholamines, serotonin, cortisol, inflammatory markers and markers of oxidative stress.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Assessment of change in the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) questionnaire.
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Self-report questionnaire for the assessment of health-related quality of life, specific to cancer type.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Assessment of change in The Social Prevision Scale (SPS)
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Self-report questionnaire for the assessment of social support.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Assessment of change in The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Cancer Specific
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Self-report questionnaire for the assessment
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Assessment of change in The Modified-Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, after the 12-week intervention, and during follow up (6 and 12 months).
Self-report questionnaire for the assessment of leisure time physical activity.
Baseline, after the 12-week intervention, and during follow up (6 and 12 months).
Assessment of change in The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Self-report questionnaire for the assessment of insomnia severity.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Assessment of change in The Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf)
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Self-report questionnaire for the assessment of pain.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Assessment of change in Maximal Oxygen Uptake
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
The highest 30 second average oxygen uptake measured during an an incremental cycling test.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Assessment of change in Muscle Cross-Sectional Area
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Ultrasound measurement of the vastus lateralis and rectus femoris.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Variation in the time interval between heartbeats.
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Assessment of change in Fat Mass
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Assessment of change in Fat Free Mass
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Assessment of change in Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.
Measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Baseline and after the 12-week intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guillaume Millet, PhD, University of Calgary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 9, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HREBA.CC-16-1010

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer-related Fatigue

Clinical Trials on Traditional Exercise

3
Subscribe