Rehabilitation After Acute Coronary Syndrome: a New Telemonitoring Strategy

June 20, 2021 updated by: Catcronic Salut SL

Prevention and Rehabilitation After Acute Coronary Syndrome: a New Telemonitoring Strategy

Cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome is recognised in the latest guidelines and recommendations published by the major scientific societies as a class I indication. Despite this evidence, the number of patients entering such programmes in Europe is still around 30%. The present study aims to validate a new comprehensive Telerehabilitation System to provide support for cardiac rehabilitation, to optimize it and to test its usefulness in terms of improving adherence to physical exercise and cardiovascular risk parameters.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To validate this approach, a clinical trial was designed to compare a 10-month program of cardiac telerehabilitation with a conventional 8-week centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Seventy patients will be randomized 1:1 to cardiac telemonitoring or centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. The characteristics of the interventions do not allow the study to be blinded to the patient or the professional. However, the analyses, stress tests and questionaires will be carried out in a masked form without the assigned group being identified by the researchers carrying out the examinations. Assessment for primary and main secondary outcomes will be performed at baseline and at ten months of follow-up, and will include self-reported physical activity (IPAQ), VO2max, blood test, general emotional distress, Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet, quality of life, vital signs, returning to work. The hypothesis is that patients randomised to prolonged telemonitoring will demonstrate higher levels of physical activity at 10-month follow-up, compared to patients in the centre-based cardiac rehabilitation programme, as well other positive changes in the cardiovascular risk profile.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

67

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain, 46008
        • Ernesto Dalli Peydró
      • Valencia, Spain, 46008
        • Hospital Politécnico Universitario la Fe

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 72 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent
  • Patients after uncomplicated acute coronary syndrome of both sexes.
  • Patients completing a maximal or symptom-limited CPET without angina or electrical ischaemia.
  • Age equal to or less than 72 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of informed consent
  • Advanced biological age.
  • Kidney failure (GFR < 30ml/min/1.73 m2).
  • Liver failure (GOT >2 times normal value).
  • Ejection fraction less than 50%.
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure (>140/90 mmHg).
  • Uncontrolled heart failure.
  • Dissecting aortic aneurysm.
  • Uncontrolled ventricular tachycardia or other dangerous ventricular arrhythmias.
  • Aortic or mitral valve disease.
  • Recent systemic or pulmonary embolism.
  • Active or recent thrombophlebitis.
  • Acute infectious diseases.
  • Uncontrolled supraventricular arrhythmias or tachycardia.
  • Repeated or frequent ventricular ectopic activity.
  • Moderate pulmonary hypertension.
  • Ventricular aneurysm.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes, thyrotoxicosis, myxedema,
  • Conduction disorders such as: complete atrioventricular block. Left bundle branch block.
  • Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome.
  • Fixed rate pacing.
  • Severe anaemia.
  • Psychoneurotic disorders.
  • Neuromuscular, musculoskeletal and arthritic disorders that may limit activity. may limit activity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cardiac tele-rehabilitation
Patients in the Intervention Group will come to the hospital 4 times during two consecutive weeks, undergoing physical exercise sessions and the same educational talks as in the control group. Subsequently, they will follow the scheduled physical activities and adherence to the risk factor management according to individualised guidelines in their App, until the end of the study period. All data generated are recorded on the professional website. The degree of compliance with the objectives set is monitored by means of 7 coloured icons, which vary according to the target achievement.

The system consists of the following elements:

  1. Professional website at the hospital, which allows:

    • To set up an individualised care plan
    • To establish the patient's risk profile and targets for improvement.
    • Long-term monitoring of the evolution of cardiovascular risk factors and events that occurred
    • Advise the patient on self-management strategies.
  2. Mobile application software with the following functions:

    • Scheduled exercise sessions
    • Medication reminder
    • Measurement reminder (weight, blood pressure, heart rate, waist circumference, etc.)
    • Messages: Inbox folder for system messages and messages generated by professionals for a specific patient or video conference.
    • Training monitor: guides the patient in the performance of their exercise.
    • Access to certified health information for patients
Active Comparator: Centre-based cardiac rehabilitation
Patients in the control group will come to the hospital 16 times during eight weeks for cycling and muscle strengthening exercises. Educational talks will be given. At the end of the hospital phase, a conventional outpatient follow-up by primary care and the corresponding specialist will be carried out.
The physical activity consisted of a workout routine and aerobic cycling training. Patients are instructed to perform 150 minutes per week of moderate physical activity when the hospital phase finishes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity derived from the International Physical Activity questionnaire (IPAQ)
Time Frame: 10 months
self-reported physical activity measured in metabolic equivalents (MET-min/week) Minimum value: 0, maximum value 19,278. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
10 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal oxygen uptake
Time Frame: 10 months
Maximal oxygen uptake during the final 30 seconds of the cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) (ml/kg/min )
10 months
Maximal heart rate
Time Frame: 10 months
Maximal heart rate at the end of the exercise testing (bpm)
10 months
Exercise time
Time Frame: 10 months
stress test duration (minutes)
10 months
Lipid parameters
Time Frame: 10 months
Total cholesterol (mg/dL), HDL cholesterol (mg/dL), LDL cholesterol (mg/dL), Non-HDL cholesterol (mg/dL), Triglycerides (mg/dL), Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-I ratio
10 months
Glycosylated haemoglobin
Time Frame: 10 months
Percentage
10 months
Weight
Time Frame: 4 and 10 months
Kg
4 and 10 months
Waist circumference
Time Frame: 4 and 10 months
waist circumference change (cm)
4 and 10 months
Visceral fat
Time Frame: 4 and 10 months
Percentage
4 and 10 months
energy expenditure obtained from the International Physical Activity questionnaire (IPAQ) questionaire
Time Frame: 10 months
Kcal/week
10 months
High level of effort obtained from the International Physical Activity questionnaire (IPAQ) questionaire
Time Frame: 10 months
Percentage
10 months
Total score of Adherence to Mediterranean Diet obtained from the Prevention with Mediterranean Diet questionnaire (PREDIMED).
Time Frame: 10 months
Units. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 14. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
10 months
High level of Adherence to Mediterranean Diet obtained from the Prevention with Mediterranean Diet questionnaire (PREDIMED)
Time Frame: 10 months
percentage. Minimum value: 0%, maximum value: 100%. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
10 months
Global score of emotional distress obtained from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 10 months
Units. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 14. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
10 months
Anxiety subscale of emotional distress obtained from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 10 months
Units. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 7. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
10 months
Depression subscale of Emotional distress obtained from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 10 months
Units. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 7. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
10 months
Global index of the health-related quality of life obtained from the European Quality of Life questionnaire (EuroQol-5D)
Time Frame: 10 months
Units. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 1. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
10 months
Health status obtained from the European Quality of Life questionnaire (EuroQol-5D)
Time Frame: 10 months
Units. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
10 months
smoking cessation
Time Frame: 10 months
percentage
10 months
Time to start the rehabilitation programme after discharge from hospital
Time Frame: 10 months
days
10 months
Returning to work
Time Frame: 10 months
days
10 months
Pulse wave velocity
Time Frame: 10 months
m/s
10 months
User's experience from the System Usability Scale (SUS) score
Time Frame: 10 months
Units. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
10 months
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: 10 months
net cost divided by changes in health outcomes
10 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ernesto Dalli Peydró, MD, Hospital Arnau de VIlanova. Valencia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 28, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 7, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Angina, Unstable

Clinical Trials on telemonitoring

3
Subscribe