Small+Safe+Well: A Longitudinal Study of TWH in Small Business (SSWell)

July 15, 2021 updated by: Lee Newman, Colorado School of Public Health
Workers in small businesses bear a disproportionate burden of occupational fatalities, illnesses, and injuries. The investigators conducted an intervention research project to determine how an intervention at the organizational level modifies business Total Worker Health (TWH) practices, safety climate, and health climate. In turn, the investigators aimed to determine whether organizational TWH adoption impacts individual workers' lifestyle health outcomes. In addition, the investigators also evaluated the use of the RE-AIM public health impact evaluation framework in the small business setting, with the intention of improving generalizability, maintenance, and dissemination of interventions and of guiding future TWH intervention design for both research and practice. The investigators conducted a lagged randomized controlled trial (L-RCT) to determine how different doses of an organizational-level TWH intervention (Health Links vs. Health Links + TWH Leadership Training) resulted in improvement and maintenance of TWH programming and organizational climates for safety and health, in small enterprises, over 36 months. The investigators also evaluated whether it resulted in improvements in workforce lifestyle health risks. In the short and mid-term, the goals and outputs of this project is a greater understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of TWH interventions and a model to test the implementation of the TWH interventions as well as an improvement the ability of TWH researchers and practitioners to apply this knowledge to TWH intervention design, implementation and evaluation to ensure generalizability. The long-term goal of this project is to impact worker safety, health and well-being through the continued use of these principles in small businesses.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2175

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Colorado small business with less than 500 employees

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Business does not operate in Colorado or has more than 500 employees

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Lagged
Businesses in the lagged arm participated in Health Links for one year from their baseline assessment to their first follow-up assessment one year later. They were eligible to participate in the Leadership Training after both assessments were completed.
Health Links is an existing community-based intervention that seeks to help businesses - especially small and medium-sized businesses - create a culture of both safety and health. Health Links does this by helping businesses incorporate Total Worker Health (TWH) programming into their business practices through assessment, advising, and certification. There is evidence that this consultation intervention is effective at helping businesses develop and implement policies and programs.
Experimental: Early
Businesses in this arm participated in Health Links + Leadership Training for one year from their baseline assessment to their first follow-up assessment one year later.
Help businesses undergo transactional (i.e., business management practices) and transformational (i.e., business leadership and culture) change. Transactional change component: Health Links is an existing community-based intervention that seeks to help businesses - especially small and medium-sized businesses - incorporate Total Worker Health (TWH) programming into their business practices through assessment, advising, and certification. There is evidence that this consultation intervention is effective at helping businesses develop and implement policies and programs.Transformational change component: The experimental arm includes TWH leadership training for small business owners and other senior leaders. This is a three-month training that includes assessments, in-person training, and virtual training transfer activities. The goal is to help the leader understand their organization's current approach to TWH, identify areas for improvement, and to take action.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Business Total Worker Health Policies and Programs
Time Frame: up to four years
Total score, out of 100, on an assessment that measures the quantity of policies and programs that the business develops and implements to protect and promote their employees' health and safety.
up to four years
Health Climate
Time Frame: up to four years

Health climate (1-5 Likert scale, Strongly disagree to strongly agree) measures employee perceptions of whether their organization is committed to their health and well-being.

Zweber, Z. M., Henning, R. A., & Magley, V. J. (2016). A practical scale for Multi-Faceted Organizational Health Climate Assessment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(2), 250-259.

up to four years
Safety Climate
Time Frame: up to four years

Safety climate (1-5 Likert scale, Strongly disagree to strongly agree) measures employee perceptions of whether their organization is committed to their safety.

Lee, J., Huang, Y.-H., Robertson, M. M., Murphy, L. A., Garabet, A., & Chang, W.-R. (2014). External validity of a generic safety climate scale for lone workers across different industries and companies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 63, 138-145.

up to four years
Overall health
Time Frame: up to four years

A self-reported measure of overall health asks the respondent to rate their overall health (1-5 Likert scale, Poor to excellent).

Schwatka, NV, Atherly, A, Dally, MJ, Fang, H, vS Brockbank, C, Tenney, L, Goetzel, RZ, Jinnett, K, Witter, R, Reynolds, S, McMillen, J, Newman, L. (2017). Health risk factors as predictors of workers' compensation claim occurrence and cost. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 74(1): 14-23.

up to four years
Well-being
Time Frame: up to four years

A self-reported measure of well-being asks the respondent to rate their well-being related to mood (1-5 Likert scale, Poor to excellent).

Staehr Johansen, K. (1998). The use of well-being measures in primary health care - the DepCare project. In World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe: Well-Being Measures in Primary Health Care - The DepCare Project. Geneva, World Healthcare Organization.

up to four years
Stress
Time Frame: up to four years

A self-reported measure of stress asks the respondent to rate their level of stress related to work, home, and finances (1-5 Likert scale, Never to always).

Schwatka, NV, Atherly, A, Dally, MJ, Fang, H, vS Brockbank, C, Tenney, L, Goetzel, RZ, Jinnett, K, Witter, R, Reynolds, S, McMillen, J, Newman, L. (2017). Health risk factors as predictors of workers' compensation claim occurrence and cost. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 74(1): 14-23.

up to four years
Sleep
Time Frame: up to four years

A self-reported measure of sleep asks the respondent about the number of hours of sleep they get in a day (<6 hours, 6-6.9 hours, 7-8 hours, and >8 hours).

Schwatka, NV, Atherly, A, Dally, MJ, Fang, H, vS Brockbank, C, Tenney, L, Goetzel, RZ, Jinnett, K, Witter, R, Reynolds, S, McMillen, J, Newman, L. (2017). Health risk factors as predictors of workers' compensation claim occurrence and cost. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 74(1): 14-23.

up to four years
Exercise
Time Frame: up to four years

A self-reported measure of exercise asks the respondent about the number of days they get moderate to vigorous physical activity for at least 30 minutes.

Schwatka, NV, Atherly, A, Dally, MJ, Fang, H, vS Brockbank, C, Tenney, L, Goetzel, RZ, Jinnett, K, Witter, R, Reynolds, S, McMillen, J, Newman, L. (2017). Health risk factors as predictors of workers' compensation claim occurrence and cost. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 74(1): 14-23.

up to four years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lee Newman, MA MA, Colorado School of Public Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • U19OH011227 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All business assessments and employee survey data collected by the researchers will be made available in a timely manner upon written request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data is currently available and will be stored in the longer term for three years after the study concludes (2023), per federal regulations.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Files with de-identified data will be transferred via electronic format using a secure electronic file transfer along with a statement of data use standards. Documentation of data use standards will be included. To protect our participants we will make the data and its associated documentation available to users only under a data-sharing agreement that provides for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed. The data will be stored in the longer term for three years after the study concludes, per federal regulations.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Life Style

Clinical Trials on Health Links

3
Subscribe