Comparison of RCA and RACD in Extra-renal Purification by SLED (ARDC-SLED)

December 15, 2023 updated by: Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile-de-France

Comparison of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation (RCA) and Regional Anticoagulation by Citrate-Free Decalcification in Renal (RACD) Replacement Therapy Using Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis

One of the main RRT issues is anticoagulation of the ECC, because blood contact with biomaterials causes bio-incompatibility reactions, including activation of the coagulation cascade. Based on Regional Citrate Anticoagulation (RCA) protocols, an ionized calcium (Ca-ion) concentration around 0.25 to 0.35mmol / L prevents fibrino formation and allows anticoagulation for the ECC. During RCA, metabolic side effects may occur due to systemic flow of citrate. Our postulate is that reduction of ionized calcemia related to the use of a calcium-free dialysate and haemofilter performance makes it possible to avoid citrate infusion. Our study aim to compare intermittent RRT using 4% Citrate infusion and without Citrate.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT), requires anticoagulation of the extracorporal circuit (ECC) using heparin, citrate or repeated rinsing. Difficulties of implementation or exposition to complications (thrombosis, hemorrhage or electrolyte disorder) are frequent.

Purpose: Regional anticoagulation of the ECC based on ionized calcemia reduction, as using citrate, but induced by the use of a calcium-free dialysate associated with the performance of the hemofilter could reduce these risks and the cost of intermittent RRT. This study aims to compare the efficiency of a regional anticoagulation technique based on the reduction of Ionized Calcium in the extracorporal circuit, without the use of Citrate and with Citrate during intermittent RRT.

Abstract: One of the main RRT issue is anticoagulation of the ECC, because blood contact with biomaterials causes bio-incompatibility reactions, including activation of the coagulation cascade. Based on Regional Citrate anticoagulation (RCA) protocols, an ionized calcium (Ca-ion) concentration around 0.25 to 0.35mmol/L prevents fibrino formation and allows anticoagulation for the ECC. During RCA, metabolic side effects may occur due to systemic passage of citrate. Our postulate is that reduction of ionized calcemia related to the use of a calcium-free dialysate and haemofilter performance makes it possible to avoid citrate infusion. Our study aims at comparing intermittent RRT using 4% Citrate infusion and without Citrate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

138

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Melun, France, 77000
        • Recruiting
        • Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile-de-France
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Franck Pourcine, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patient requiring Renal replacement Therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Hypercalcemia ≥ 3 mmol/L.
  • Major under guardianship
  • Major deprived of freedom
  • Impossible to obtain free and informed consent
  • Presence of hemostasis or coagulation disorders:
  • Thrombocytopenia < 30 G/L.
  • Curative anticoagulation.
  • Severe liver disease with Prothrombin rate <30%.
  • Coagulation factor deficit.
  • Not registered to a social security system.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group 1: RACD - RCA
First period of treatment with Regional Anticoagulation by Citrate-Free Decalcification SLED and second period of treatment with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation SLED
All patient requiring Renal replacement Therapy in the intensive care unit will be randomized in open order (cross-over) with either Regional anticoagulation with Citrate or Regional anticoagulation by Decalcification without Citrate
Other Names:
  • intermittent haemodialysis equipment with lower blood flow and dialysate flow combined with prolonged sessions
Other: Group 2 : RCA - RACD
First period of treatment with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation SLED and second period of treatment with Regional Anticoagulation by Citrate-Free Decalcification SLED
All patient requiring Renal replacement Therapy in the intensive care unit will be randomized in open order (cross-over) with either Regional anticoagulation with Citrate or Regional anticoagulation by Decalcification without Citrate
Other Names:
  • intermittent haemodialysis equipment with lower blood flow and dialysate flow combined with prolonged sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of the plasma urea
Time Frame: up to 8 hours
We will compare plasma urea clearance after reaching the prescribed session time without irreversible coagulation of the extracorporeal circuit, with both methods tested in the study.
up to 8 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of the concentration of Ca²+i in post-filter
Time Frame: 30 minutes, 1 hour; 4 hours and 8 hours
Measurement at different timepoints after the beginning of the concentration of Ca²+i in post-filter during each RRT session.
30 minutes, 1 hour; 4 hours and 8 hours
Measurement of the concentration of Ca²+i (patient)
Time Frame: 30minutes, 1 hour; 4 hours and 8 hours
Measurement at different timepoints after the beginning of the concentration of Ca²+i (patient) during each RRT session.
30minutes, 1 hour; 4 hours and 8 hours
Measurement of the concentration of Mg2+
Time Frame: 8 hours
Measurement of the concentration of Mg2+ at the end of each RRT session.
8 hours
Measurement of heart rate during each RRT session.
Time Frame: Hour 0; 30 minutes; 60 minutes; 90 minutes; 120 minutes; 150 minutes; 180 minutes; 210 minutes; 240 minutes; 270 minutes; 300 minutes; 330 minutes; 360 minutes; 390 minutes; 420 minutes; 450 minutes; 480 minutes
Measurement heart rate during each RRT session.
Hour 0; 30 minutes; 60 minutes; 90 minutes; 120 minutes; 150 minutes; 180 minutes; 210 minutes; 240 minutes; 270 minutes; 300 minutes; 330 minutes; 360 minutes; 390 minutes; 420 minutes; 450 minutes; 480 minutes
Measurement of blood pressure
Time Frame: Hour 0; 30 minutes; 60 minutes; 90 minutes; 120 minutes; 150 minutes; 180 minutes; 210 minutes; 240 minutes; 270 minutes; 300 minutes; 330 minutes; 360 minutes; 390 minutes; 420 minutes; 450 minutes; 480 minutes
Measurement of blood pressure during each RRT session.
Hour 0; 30 minutes; 60 minutes; 90 minutes; 120 minutes; 150 minutes; 180 minutes; 210 minutes; 240 minutes; 270 minutes; 300 minutes; 330 minutes; 360 minutes; 390 minutes; 420 minutes; 450 minutes; 480 minutes
Number of circuit losses during each RRT session,
Time Frame: Hour 0; 480 minutes
Number of circuit losses during each RRT sessions,
Hour 0; 480 minutes
Number of catheter thrombosis during each RRT session
Time Frame: Hour 0; 480 minutes
Number of catheter thrombosis during each RRT session
Hour 0; 480 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Franck Pourcine, MD, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile-de-France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Kidney Injury

Clinical Trials on Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis

3
Subscribe