In Vivo Clinical Investigation of the Safety and Performance of Dental Implants TBR® Tissue Level Z1 (Z1)

April 25, 2024 updated by: Sudimplant SAS - Groupe TBR

In Vivo Clinical Investigation of the Safety and Performance of Dental Implants TBR® Tissue Level Z1 With Ceramic Emergence

Partial or total edentulousness has a significant impact on quality of life both functionally and aesthetically.

TBR® Tissue Level Z1 Implants allow the patient to prevent bone resorption and maintain facial tissue and musculature support. At the functional level, the patient who benefits from implant treatment regains normal masticatory function with all the benefits on the quality of life that this can bring him.

Due to the osseointegration of the implant and the biocompatibility of the materials used, the implant treatment remains effective in the long term and makes it possible to maintain the aesthetics of the smile.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Many adults have one or more missing teeth. The negative consequences of partial or total edentulousness are numerous in the orofacial sphere:

  • Edentulousness causes a strong aesthetic deficit due to the lack of support of facial tissues and musculature;
  • Edentulousness generates a functional deficit that can have significant repercussions on the nutritional status of the affected subject;
  • Edentulousness is accompanied by bone resorption of the jawbones which is inevitable in the absence of implant treatment;
  • In addition, the resulting feelings of discomfort and fragility are experienced as a real psychological handicap by the patient, partially or totally edentulous, which can then have significant repercussions on his social life.

TBR® Tissue Level Z1 implants are intended for placement in the maxillary or mandibular arch in partially or completely edentulous patients for prosthetic restoration in the following cases:

  • Single edentulousness,
  • Intercalary edentulousness,
  • Terminal edentulousness,
  • Total edentulousness.

The following clinical conditions must be observed before placing a dental implant:

  • Sufficient quality and volume of bone support;
  • Healthy oral condition;
  • no contraindications for implant setting

The procedure used to accomplish its intended use is as follows:

  • The receiving implant site is prepared using an established drilling sequence then the implant is placed in this site: the body of the implant (in titanium) has an endosseous position while the ring (in ceramic) remains transgingival;
  • After an osseointegration time, the final prosthetic abutment will be loaded on the implant.

The expected benefits of this surgery are to improve the quality of life of patients, to recover the chewing function and the aesthetics of the smile.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

152

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34000
        • Cabinet du Dr ALLOUCHE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient partially or totally toothless

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient 18 years of age or older
  • Patient who has completed bone growth
  • Patient informed and willing to participate in the study
  • Partially or totally toothless patient who will be implanted with the TBR® Bone Level implant(s) for the prospective cohort
  • Patient implanted with the TBR® TISSUE LEVEL Z1 implant(s) before June 2011 for the retrospective cohort

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Patient with bone disease of the head and neck region
  • Patient refusing to participate in the study
  • Patient with at least one contraindication to implantation
  • Patient on osteoporosis treatment with Biphosphonates or Denosumab.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the success rate of tissue integration of the implant
Time Frame: 15 years after implantation
Integration of the implant 15 years after implantation
15 years after implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the quality of life of patients following the recovery of a complete dentition with the OHIP- 14 score (Oral Health Impact Profile)
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
The quality of life of patients will be evaluate with the OHIP- 14 score (Oral Health Impact Profile) before implantation and 5 years after implantation
5 years after implantation
Complication rate taking into account pain, local tenderness, infection, allergy, mobility of the implant, fracture
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
pain, local tenderness, infection, allergy, mobility of the implant, fracture will be collected during during the 5 years follow-up
5 years after implantation
Measuring chewing function with occlusal assessment
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
Occlusal assessment will be performed after implantation and at 5 years follow-up
5 years after implantation
Radiographic analysis of the osseointegration of the implant
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
A radiographic analysiswill be performed after implantation and at 5 years follow-up to evaluate the osseointegration of the implant
5 years after implantation
Absence of inflammation (visual) and infection (radiographic)
Time Frame: 5 years after implantation
Assessment of inflammation with visual examination and assessment of infection with radiographic examination 5 years after implantation
5 years after implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-A01926-51

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Edentulous Mouth

Clinical Trials on Dental implant

3
Subscribe