Patient Reported Outcome on Genital Sensitivity and Sexual Function After Genital Gender Affirming Surgery (PROGAS)

December 21, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent
For genital gender affirming surgery, it remains unclear to what extent genital sensitivity might be expected and what the impact of this might be on sexual functioning.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Gender dysphoria refers to an inner mental unrest resulting from an incongruity between the assigned biological sex and the mentally experienced sex. The generally accepted treatment for gender dysphoria aims to bring a person's physical characteristics in line with his or her perceived gender identity. This gender-affirming treatment consists of a combination of psychological counselling, hormonal therapy and, if desired, genital gender-affirming surgery. This involves the removal of the biological reproductive organs and in some cases (part of) the biological sex organs. These can be replaced by surrogate sex organs of the desired sex while maintaining urological and sexual function. In transgender women, this is achieved with vulvoplasty or vaginoplasty, while in transgender men, metoidioplasty or phalloplasty is performed.

While urological functioning is an extensively studied topic in transgender patients after genital gender confirmation surgery, sexual functioning is often considered of secondary importance, even though it is one of the goals of gender confirmation surgery. In the transgender man, a phalloplasty is performed using microsurgical techniques that allow the nerves of the donor flap (usually from the forearm or upper leg) to be connected to the genital and inguinal nerves. In metoidioplasty, the clitoris is preserved and forms the base of a micro-penis. In the transgender woman, the glans penis is partially preserved to create a clitoris. The purpose of this is to achieve maximum sensitivity of the genital area.

There are few reports in the literature demonstrating sensory recovery in these extensively operated body parts, let alone what the added value on sexual functioning might be as a result of this recovery of genital sensitivity. At Ghent University Hospital, we now have more than 30 years' experience with such operations and have shared this experience in an almost entirely retrospective manner in various publications to date. However, in order to address the bias associated with retrospective research, this study aims to prospectively and observationally collect data on these patients who are counseled in a pathway for gender dysphoria. This study will include all patients - after informed consent - and will collect specific data on surgical outcome (complications after surgery, duration of surgery, type of surgery) and functional outcome (tailored questionnaires for patients undergoing such a treatment with questions on urination, erections, sexual experience, quality of life, patient satisfaction and genital sensitivity) for each of these various surgical options. These outcomes will be verified at follow-up moments (after 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months). Specifically for the component on genital sensitivity, we plan to follow up patients 3-monthly by means of a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test of the genital region up to 24 months postoperatively. The aim of this study is therefore to use this prospectively collected data to truthfully map our experience, to be critical, to reflect and optimize our daily clinical practice in the interest of the patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • East-Flanders
      • Ghent, East-Flanders, Belgium, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Ghent
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anne-Françoise Spinoit, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wietse Claeys, MD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nicolaas Lumen, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 108 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Voluntarily signed written informed consent according to the rules of Good Clinical Practice (Declaration of Helsinki) and national regulations
  • Patient age ≥ 18 years
  • Transgender male, female of gender non-conforming patient with diagnosed gender dysphoria and the specific wish to undergo genital gender affirming surgery
  • Fit for operation, based on the surgeon's expert opinion
  • Patient is able and willing to attend the follow-up consultations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of signed written informed consent and thus a patient unwilling to participate.
  • Patient age < 18 years
  • Cisgender patients
  • Patients unfit for operation
  • Patient declares that it will be impossible for him to attend the follow-up consultations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Genital sensation and sexual functioning assessment

Genital sensation testing with clinical assessment and self-examination questionnaire.

Sexual functioning testing with questionnaires.

Semmes-Weinstein test for the assessment of genital sensation Battery of questionnaires assessing sexual function, voiding function, quality of life and patient satisfaction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in genital sensitivity pattern at 24 months
Time Frame: Baseline function test, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of follow-up
Mapping of pressure thresholds of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments in pre-defined areas of the neo-genital area
Baseline function test, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in postoperative sexual function
Time Frame: Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Assessed with Male Sexual Health Questionnaire/Female Sexual Function Index questionnaires (MSHQ/FSFI) with added questions specifically on penetrative sexual activity
Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Change in self-assessment of genital anatomy and genital sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of follow-up
Assessed with Self-Assessment of Genital Anatomy and Sexual Function (Male and Female) questionnaires (SAGASF-M/SAGASF-F)
Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months of follow-up
Change in voiding function
Time Frame: Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Assessed with International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire on Male and Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-MLUTS/ICIQ-FLUTS)
Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Change in urinary continence
Time Frame: Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Assessed with International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire on Urge Incontinence short form questionnaire (ICIQ-UI SF)
Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Change in maximum flow rate
Time Frame: Uroflowmetry at baseline, followed by uroflowmetry at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Assessed by uroflowmetry (Qmax)
Uroflowmetry at baseline, followed by uroflowmetry at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Change in satisfaction with life by Likert and VAS scales
Time Frame: Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Assessed with Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) questionnaire
Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Change in satisfaction with life by Likert and VAS scales
Time Frame: Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Assessed with Subjective happiness scale (SHS) questionnaire
Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Change in quality of life assessed by Likert scales.
Time Frame: Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Assessed by the EuroQol questionnaire EQ-5D-3L.
Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Change in quality of life assessed by VAS scale.
Time Frame: Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Assessed by the EuroQol questionnaire EQ-VAS (0-100)
Baseline questionnaire, followed by reassessment at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Subjective patient satisfaction with surgical and functional outcome assessed by Likert scales.
Time Frame: Assessed at 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Assessed with seven subjective patient satisfaction questions on different surgical and functional outcomes aspects using Likert scales
Assessed at 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Patient motivations for surgery and extent to which these expectations were met as a result of the operation assessed by VAS scales
Time Frame: Baseline questions, followed by reassessed at 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Assessed with fourteen motivational questions using VAS scales (0-100)
Baseline questions, followed by reassessed at 12 and 24 months of follow-up
Postoperative complication rate
Time Frame: Within 90 days postoperatively
Categorized according to Clavien-Dindo classification system
Within 90 days postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • B6702021000410

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gender Dysphoria

Clinical Trials on Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing and questionnaires

3
Subscribe