Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Integration Into Rheumatology Clinical Practice

April 5, 2024 updated by: Dinesh Khanna, MD, MS, University of Michigan
This study will examine the impact of providing patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) scores to patients before appointments with their healthcare provider.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • The University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria for patients:

  • New and established patients seeking care at Michigan Medicine rheumatology clinics
  • Patients should have access to the patient portal in MiChart patient portal
  • Patients should have access to the internet at home to be able to complete the PROMIS PRO measures and study surveys online
  • Patients should have completed PROMIS pain, physical function, and sleep disturbance measures at least one day before their baseline appointment
  • At least one of the PROMIS PRO scores should be in the concerning zone (pain intensity ≥ 5, physical function ≤ 40, or sleep disturbance ≥ 60).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speakers
  • under 18 years of age

Inclusion Criteria for providers:

  • Rheumatology health care providers, including clinicians and advanced practice providers at Michigan Medicine who are currently treating rheumatology patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those not meeting the inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PRO Integration into Clinical Practice
PRO scores will be shared with patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) via an emailed report card
HCPs will document their discussion and recommendations/referrals in MiChart (Epic EMR)
No Intervention: Usual Care
Patients and HCPs will not receive an emailed PROMIS score report. PROMIS scores, however, will be available in the EMR as usual.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Appointments at Which Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores Are Documented in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Note by the Participating Health Care Provider (HCP)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Documentation in EMR notes will be categorized as either 'yes' or 'no' and identified through EMR data pulls. Percent of appointments is shown by the count (and percentage) of participants for whom PROMIS scores were documented in the EMR for their appointment.
Up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Appointments at Which Referrals/Recommendations Related to PROMIS Scores Are Documented in the EMR Note by the Participating HCP
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Documentation in EMR notes will be either 'yes' or 'no' and identified through EMR data pulls. Percent of appointments is shown by the count (and percentage) of participants for whom referrals were documented in the EMR.
Up to 3 months
Quality of Patient-provider Communication
Time Frame: Up to 2 weeks
Patient-provider communication is measured using the Interpersonal Processes of Care (IPC) Survey (29 items), which measures 7 subscales. For the subscales "elicited concerns/responded", "explained results/medications", "patient-centered decision making", and "compassionate, respectful" a higher score is better. For the subscales "hurried communication", "discrimination", and "disrespectful office staff" a lower score is better. (score for each subscale ranges from 1-5; + indicates a higher score is better, - indicates a lower score is better). Questions were not mandatory.
Up to 2 weeks
Change in Score of the Most Bothersome PROMIS Domain
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months

Change in score of PROMIS domain deemed most bothersome by each subject at baseline. Pain intensity is reported as a scaled score of 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible. Physical function and sleep disturbance are reported as T-scores.

The scores in PROMIS measures are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general population, and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured, except physical function where a lower T-score indicates increased impairment. With physical function, a higher score indicates greater function and with sleep disturbance, a lower score indicates less disturbance.

Baseline, 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dinesh Khanna, MD, MSc, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 26, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00149448
  • K24AR063120 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatic Diseases

Clinical Trials on PRO Integration into Clinical Practice

3
Subscribe