Echogenic Versus Non-echogenic Needles for Venous Access

February 26, 2024 updated by: Trine Kåsine, Oslo University Hospital

Ultrasound Guided Subclavian Vein Cannulation. Echogenic Needles Versus Non-echogenic Needles

Randomized controlled intervention study comparing echogenic needles with non echogenic needles for ultrasound guided venous access in the subclavian vein.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients undergoing certain surgical procedures and patients in intensive care unit require a central venous catheter (CVC) for infusion of medicaments and for monitoring. Central venous access (CVA) can be performed both with a blind technique or an ultrasound guided technique. A common place for CVA is the subclavian vein.

While many guidelines recommend the use of ultrasound for jugular access, there are no explicit recommendations for subclavian CVA For ultrasound guided CVA procedures good needle visualization is important to successfully place the needle and catheter in the correct position.

Echogenic needles can give better needle visualization when performing ultrasound guided CVA procedures. Theoretically, the use of echogenic needles should improve performance time and success rates, and reduce complication rates due to a better needling control.

The investigators will investigate the use of echogenic needles for vascular access.

A prospective randomized controlled trial design will be used. Echogenic needles will be compared with non-echogenic (standard) needles. The main null hypothesis states that there is no difference in access time between the needles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0424
        • Oslo University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

undergoing a surgical procedure requiring a CVC Patients must be at least 18 years of age. Patients that have given informed written consent.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that do not speak or understand Norwegian language.
  • Skin disease or infection affecting the whole-body surface or within the area of examination.
  • Patients with untreated coagulopathy
  • Known vascular abnormality
  • Any reason why, in the opinion of the investigators, the patient should not participate.
  • Subject participates in a potentially confounding drug or device trial during the course of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Echogenic needle
venous access performed under ultrasound guidance with echogenic needles
echogenic needles for intravenous access (subclavian vein) ultrasound guided procedure
No Intervention: Non-Echogenic needles
venous access performed under ultrasound guidance with non-echogenic needles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from skin puncture of the needle until aspiration of venous blood.
Time Frame: 10 sec - 240 sec
Time from skin puncture of the needle until aspiration of venous blood in the syringe. Time till venous access
10 sec - 240 sec

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from skin puncture until catheter in place
Time Frame: 60 sec - 600 sec
Time from skin puncture until the catheter in place in the subclavian vein.
60 sec - 600 sec
Success with venous access in first needling attempt
Time Frame: 60 sec - 600 sec
Success in first attempt is defined as one skin puncture and directly into the subclavian vein
60 sec - 600 sec
Number of needling attempts before venous access
Time Frame: 60 sec - 600 sec
Number of attempts is defined as the counted number of needle attempts intermitted by a needle withdrawal of at least 0.5 cm until aspiration of venous blood.
60 sec - 600 sec
Number of skin punctures
Time Frame: 60 sec - 600 sec
Number of skin punctures is defined as the counted number of skin punctures until aspiration of venous blood.
60 sec - 600 sec
The procedure was aborted
Time Frame: 2 minutes - 20 minutes
Discontinuation of the procedure or change of site for vascular access
2 minutes - 20 minutes
Localization of catheter tip in x-ray
Time Frame: 1 day- 7 days
Catheter misplacement judged by x-ray. X-ray will be performed after the surgery and a blinded observer will describe the localization of the catheter.
1 day- 7 days
The anaesthetists subjective experience with needle visualization
Time Frame: 3 min- 20 min
After performing the vascular access the anaesthetists are asked about how they found the visualization of the needle using a Numeric Rating Scale
3 min- 20 min
The anaesthetists subjective experience with the needle placement
Time Frame: 3 minutes - 20 minutes
After performing the vascular access the anaesthetist is asked how the needle placement was using a Numeric Rating Scale
3 minutes - 20 minutes
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, pneumothorax hematothorax
Time Frame: 1 minutes- 1 day
Adverse events, including information of the seriousness, treatment needed, resolution and relevant judgment concerning the causal relationship with the investigational devices or procedure will be summarized for safety information
1 minutes- 1 day
Incidence of delayed Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events pneumothorax, hematothorax
Time Frame: 5 minutes - 1 week
Adverse device effects, including information of the seriousness, treatment needed, resolution and relevant judgment concerning the causal relationship with the investigational devices or procedure will be summarized
5 minutes - 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Trine Kåsine, MD, Department of Anaesthesiology Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REK 85090

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on echogenic needles for intravenous access

3
Subscribe