Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Fully-Automated Digital vs. Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Programs

December 21, 2023 updated by: Johns Hopkins University
The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of a fully automated digital diabetes prevention program to standard of care human coach-based diabetes prevention programs for promoting clinically meaningful lifestyle changes to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes in adults with prediabetes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

After being informed about the study and potential risk, all participants giving written informed consent will undergo screening to determine eligibility for study entry. At baseline visit (month 0). Participants who meet the eligibility requirements will be randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to human coach-based diabetes prevention program or digital diabetes prevention program. An equal number of participants will be randomly assigned to both groups (like flipping a coin).

If participants are randomly assigned to receive the human coach-based diabetes prevention program, the participants will be referred to a local Diabetes Prevention Program close to the participants' area. The Diabetes Prevention Program consists of 16 weekly sessions during months 1 to 6 and 6 sessions during months 7 to 12. These group sessions may be delivered in-person at the local program or remotely using video conferencing. During these sessions, participants will receive information about lifestyle change behaviors focusing on weight loss, physical activity, and nutrition from a trained lifestyle coach.

If participants are randomly assigned to receive the digital Diabetes Prevention Program, the participants will receive the Sweetch Digital Health Kit (Sweetch Health, Ltd.) in the mail within approximately 8-12 days of the participants' first study visit. The Sweetch digital health kit consists of a smartphone app and a digital body weight scale that is connected via Bluetooth to the app. The phone app also consists of brief Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lessons on type 2 diabetes prevention, which participants will be encouraged to complete.

There will be a total of 3 study visits (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months), each visit includes fingerstick hemoglobin A1C measurement, weight measurement, and completion of several questionnaires. Height will be measured at the first visit. Throughout the 12-month study, participants will be asked to wear a device on the participants' wrist to measure physical activity for 7 consecutive days following the first visit and once every month thereafter.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

368

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    • Pennsylvania
      • Reading, Pennsylvania, United States, 19611
        • Reading Hospital - Tower Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form.
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.
  • Laboratory evidence of prediabetes, defined as any of the following lab results, in the past year:

    1. Hemoglobin A1C 5.7% to 6.4%
    2. Fasting glucose 100-125 mg/dL
    3. Plasma glucose of 140-199 mg/dL measured 2 hours after a 75 gm glucose load
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (or≥23 kg/m2 for Asians).
  • Proficiency in reading English.
  • Smartphone user (Android Operating System (OS) 9.0 or iOS 13.3 or newer).
  • Plans to reside in recruitment area for the next 12 months (participant's zip code of residence is within ~45 miles of the study recruitment site.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical conditions that prevent adoption of moderate physical activity (per primary care clinician).
  • Aortic stenosis.
  • Unstable cardiac disease (myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke in previous 6 months, currently participating in cardiac rehabilitation).
  • Has a pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), or other implanted electronic device.
  • Use of any glucose-lowering medications, weight loss medications, or any systemic glucocorticoids within the previous 3 months.
  • Active malignancy of any type or diagnosed with or treated for cancer within the past 2 years. Individuals with basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been successfully treated will be allowed to participate.
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.
  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy in the next 12 months.
  • Anemia.
  • Receiving treatment for iron-deficiency anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency, or folate d efficiency.
  • Hemoglobinopathy (HbS or HbC disease).
  • Blood transfusion in previous 4 months.
  • On dialysis or active organ transplant list.
  • Treated with erythropoietin.
  • Major psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia) or use of antipsychotic medications within the past 1 year.
  • Dementia or Alzheimer's disease.
  • Diagnosed with an eating disorder (anorexia nervosa, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, Pica, rumination disorder, other specified or unspecified feeding or eating disorder)
  • Diagnosed or self-reported alcohol or substance abuse.
  • Known allergy to steel.
  • Participation in another clinical trial related to lifestyle management or diabetes prevention.
  • Currently attending or attended a diabetes prevention program in the previous 2 years.
  • Unwilling to accept random assignments.
  • Had bariatric surgery within the 12 months prior randomization or is planning to undergo bariatric surgery during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fully-Automated Digital Diabetes Prevention Program
Participants will receive Sweetch Digital Diabetes Prevention Program consists of a smartphone app and bluetooth-enabled digital body weight scale that syncs with the app.

The Sweetch app is a hyper-personalized mobile digital coach that provides users with tailored recommendations to promote healthy lifestyle behaviors (150 minutes per week of physical activity, weight reduction, and healthy eating habits) to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes.

The Sweetch app uses self-tracking and multiple evidence-based persuasive eCoaching strategies. The Sweetch artificial intelligence algorithm delivers just-in-time support and/or adapt recommendations based on the user's response. For example, push notifications will be sent when the algorithm detects that the user is potentially available and able to act upon the recommendation, based on various parameters including location, previous response, calendar availability, and weather, etc.

Active Comparator: Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program
Participants will attend a total of 16 weekly sessions during months 1 to 6 and 6 sessions during months 7 to 12. These group sessions may be delivered in-person at the local program or remotely using video conferencing. During these sessions, participants will receive information about lifestyle change behaviors focusing on weight loss, physical activity, and nutrition from a trained lifestyle coach.
The Human Coach-Based Diabetes Prevention Program will consist of a CDC recognized lifestyle change program. Participants will attend a total of 16 weekly sessions during months 1 to 6 and 6 sessions during months 7 to 12. These group sessions may be delivered in-person at the local program or remotely using video conferencing. During these sessions, participants will receive information about lifestyle change behaviors focusing on weight loss, physical activity, and nutrition from a trained lifestyle coach.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Achievement of CDC's benchmark for type 2 diabetes risk reduction as a binary outcome (yes/no)
Time Frame: 12 months

The achievement is defined as attainment of one or more of the following:

  1. At least 5% weight loss at 12 months.
  2. At least 4% weight loss at 12 months and at least 150 minutes/week of physical activity (measured using monthly serial Actigraphy and averaged over months 1-11)
  3. At least 0.2% reduction in A1C at 12 months (for participants whose A1C result obtained at baseline study visit is between 5.7% and 6.4%).
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness as assessed by the Markov model
Time Frame: 12 months
The investigators will compare the cost-effectiveness of the two interventions based on lifetime horizon by constructing a Markov model with model parameters populated from the trial results as well as other published literature. The model will estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between the two interventions.
12 months
Change in hemoglobin A1C
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in HbA1C (percentage) from baseline to 6 months and 12 months
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Percentage weight change
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Percentage weight (percent) change from baseline to 6 and 12 months
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Absolute weight change
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Absolute weight change (kilograms) from baseline to 6 and 12 months
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in physical activity - average minutes/week of physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in physical activity measure (average minutes/week of physical activity) assessed using blinded Actigraphy (monthly serial consecutive 7-days wear period) from baseline to 6 months and 12 months.
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in physical activity - hours per week of physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in physical activity measure (metabolic equivalent task (MET)-hours per week of physical activity) assessed using blinded Actigraphy (monthly serial consecutive 7-days wear period) from baseline to 6 months and 12 months.
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in physical activity - average number of steps per day
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in physical activity measures (average number of steps per day) assessed using blinded Actigraphy (monthly serial consecutive 7-days wear period) from baseline to 6 months and 12 months.
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Engagement with programs as assessed by a score out of 100%
Time Frame: 6 months
To compare engagement with digital vs. human coach-based DPPs and evaluate whether between-group differences in clinical outcomes are mediated by engagement, the investigators will define an engagement score (out of 100%) for the hDPP based on the percentage of total number of sessions attended, using the most current CDC engagement definitions at the time of completion of the study. Percentage engagement will be defined out of a total of 8 sessions in month 1-6. An engagement score (out of 100%) for the dDPPs will based on percentage of full weeks during which the app is installed and a) both push notifications and motion sensors are enabled or b) the participant accesses any component within the app for months 1-6.
6 months
Engagement with programs as assessed by a score out of 100%
Time Frame: 12 months
To compare engagement with digital vs. human coach-based DPPs and evaluate whether between-group differences in clinical outcomes are mediated by engagement, the investigators will define an engagement score (out of 100%) for the hDPP based on the percentage of total number of sessions attended, using the most current CDC engagement definitions at the time of completion of the study. Percentage engagement will be defined out of a total of 3 sessions in month 7-12. An engagement score (out of 100%) for the dDPPs will based on percentage of full weeks during which the app is installed and a) both push notifications and motion sensors are enabled or b) the participant accesses any component within the app for months 7-12
12 months
Incidence of type 2 diabetes
Time Frame: 6 months
Percentage of individuals who develop type 2 diabetes (A1C ≥6.5%).
6 months
Incidence of type 2 diabetes
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of individuals who develop type 2 diabetes (A1C ≥6.5%).
12 months
Acceptability as assessed by the 32-item acceptability questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months

To compare the acceptability of the two interventions (satisfaction, utility, interest, motivation, user experience, etc.) using the 32-item acceptability questionnaire.

Scoring: Sum up all responses to questions 1-31, divide by 155, and multiply by 100 to calculate percentage score out of 100%. The range of possible scores is 20% (lowest acceptability) to 100% (highest possible acceptability).

6 months
Acceptability as assessed by the 32-item acceptability questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months

To compare the acceptability of the two interventions (satisfaction, utility, interest, motivation, user experience, etc.) using the 32-item acceptability questionnaire.

Scoring: Sum up all responses to questions 1-31, divide by 155 and multiply by 100 to calculate percentage score out of 100%. The range of possible scores is 20% (lowest acceptability) to 100% (highest possible acceptability).

12 months
Correlation between self-reported and measured physical activity
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months

To evaluate the correlation between self-reported PA data collected using different methods:

  • Data collected and reported by hDPPs
  • Self-reported PA data collected by study team obtained at 1-month intervals
  • Objectively measured PA data (Actigraphy) obtained at 1-month intervals
6 months and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nestoras Mathioudakis, MD MHS, Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The Data Coordinating Center (Johns Hopkins University) will prepare a de-identified database that is consistent with HIPAA requirements. The de-identified database will include all study research data and will be stored in a repository at Johns Hopkins University (archive.data.jhu.edu) at a time that will coincide with the online publication of the study primary endpoint paper. The repository will contain documentation designed to facilitate use of the database. The documentation prepared for the repository will include a list and timetable for secondary and exploratory papers planned by the study investigators. Access to the database will be restricted to qualified users. Qualified users will include those investigators who submit valid pre-specified hypotheses and certify that they will not use the data for commercial purposes.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The study protocol will be submitted for publication within 1 year of the start of enrollment.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperglycemia

Clinical Trials on Human Coach-based Diabetes Prevention Program (hDPP)

3
Subscribe