Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Buccal Screening Evaluation Using an RT-PCR Assay and a Rapid ELISA Test Among Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients (CORDAGES)

October 19, 2021 updated by: Centre Scientifique de Monaco

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Buccal Screening Evaluation Using an RT-PCR Assay and a Rapid ELISA Test Among Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients: the CORDAGES Study

The main objective is to expand screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of the RT-PCR test (Cobas® Roche, Switzerland) and the ELISA Point of Contact Testing (PORTABLE COVID-19 ANTIGEN LAB® Stark, Italy) on buccal swab compared to the reference test, the RT-PCR test (Cobas® Roche, Switzerland) on nasopharyngeal swab.

Secondary objectives

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of oral swab RT-PCR and POCT relative to the quantitative amplification (Ct) values of the NP Swab RT-PCR assay.
  • Analyze RT-PCR amplification cycle thresholds (Ct) and POCT diagnostic accuracy as a function of the presence and timing of symptoms.
  • Among symptomatic participants, compare clinical presentations between positive and negative participants on the NP swab RT-PCR test.
  • The RT-PCR test may be imperfectly sensitive, ranging from 71 to 98%3. Using a Bayesian latent class model, the investigators will assess the true accuracy of POCT as it does not require the assumption that any one test or combination of tests is perfect14,15.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Eric VOIGLIO, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +37798984850
  • Email: evoiglio@gouv.mc

Study Locations

      • Monaco, Monaco, 98000
        • Recruiting
        • Centre National de Depistage - Espace Leo Ferre
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eric VOIGLIO, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Thomas ALTHAUS, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Herve RAPS, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Olivier DEJOUX, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Patrick RAMPAL, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18+ patient eligible for COVID-19 testing in Monaco
  • symptoms suggestive of COVID-19
  • contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to participate in the study
  • preventive screening of professional groups
  • inability to return to the screening center within 48-72 hours of the first visit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Buccal and nasopharyngeal swabs
One patient will have 3 swabs taken, 2 buccal for PCR and ELISA POCT, 1 nasopharyngeal for PCR
3 swabs taken, buccal for RT-PCR and ELISA POCT, nasopharyngeal for RT-PCR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive patients for the two different sampling types (buccal vs nasopharyngeal) and two methods (ELISA POCT vs RT-PCR)
Time Frame: 48 Hours
Number of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive patients by sampling type (buccal and nasopharyngeal swab) and analytical method (ELISA POCT vs RT-PC)
48 Hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Ct values in buccal and nasopharyngeal swabs
Time Frame: 48 Hours
Ct values by PCR in buccal and nasopharyngeal swabs
48 Hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 18, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on ELISA POCT vs RT-PCR

3
Subscribe