Pragmatic Obstructive Sleep Apnea Weight Loss Trial Assessing Effectiveness and Reach (POWER)

April 25, 2024 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Pragmatic Obstructive Sleep Apnea Weight Loss Trial Assessing Effectiveness and Reach (POWER)

Prevalent obesity related conditions like obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) represent an important opportunity to improve population health. OSA reduces quality of life and is associated with greater risk for cardiovascular disease. Although obesity is the single greatest reversible risk factor for OSA, patients with OSA and obesity rarely receive weight loss care to reverse OSA and other serious comorbidities. Efficacy trials reinforce that time and resource intensive lifestyle-based weight loss programs improve weight and physiologic measures of OSA severity (apnea hypopnea index, AHI). However, there are barriers to translating these findings into meaningful gains for population health. To meet these challenges, the investigators propose a pragmatic trial of proactively offering a remote video-based and self-directed lifestyle-based weight loss intervention with remote coaching to patients with OSA. The investigators primary aim is to test the effectiveness of a proactively delivered and pragmatic lifestyle intervention to improve co-primary endpoints of sleep-related quality of life and weight among patients with OSA and obesity. Secondarily, the investigators will compare additional outcomes between groups including cardiovascular risk scores, sleep symptoms, AHI, well-being, and global ratings of change. Finally, the investigators will also conduct an implementation process evaluation informed by the RE-AIM framework to identify barriers and facilitators to widespread implementation.

The investigators will identify patients with OSA and obesity nationwide (n=696) in VA using data from the VA's Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), and the investigators will contact potentially eligible patients. After confirming eligibility and consent, the investigators will randomly assign subjects to receive the study's lifestyle intervention or usual care alone. The study uses CDW to assess weight change. Subjects will complete questionnaires at baseline at 3, 12 and 21 months after randomization. The lifestyle intervention in POWER focuses on gradual lifestyle behavior change aimed at improving eating habits and increasing physical activity. It encourages participants to gradually achieve and maintain a 5-10% loss of baseline body weight and at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity, such as brisk walking, each week. The lifestyle intervention program consists of watching one video, completing corresponding written self-guided learning materials, and tracking food intake and physical activity each week for the first 12 weeks, then working through 10 additional written handouts and continued food and activity tracking for the next nine months. Intervention participants will have access to a lifestyle coach as desired for the full 12-month intervention period.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

  1. Objective(s) and Hypotheses:

    The investigators' primary aim is to test the effectiveness of a proactively delivered and pragmatic weight loss intervention to improve co-primary endpoints of sleep-related quality of life and weight among Veterans with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and obesity.

    Secondarily, the investigators will compare additional outcomes between groups including cardiovascular risk scores, sleep symptoms, AHI, well-being, and global ratings of change. The investigators will also conduct an implementation process evaluation informed by the RE-AIM framework to identify predictors and determinants of population uptake of the intervention.

  2. Research Design:

    The investigators plan a hybrid type 1 pragmatic randomized controlled trial assessing effectiveness and an implementation process evaluation.

  3. Methodology The investigators will proactively identify patients with OSA and obesity nationwide in VA using data from the CDW (n=696), randomizing patients 1:1 to usual care plus the lifestyle-based weight loss intervention or usual care alone. The investigators will collect primary outcomes at 12 months, but will also collect outcomes at 3 and up to 24 months to assess trends over time.
  4. Findings/Progress to Date:

Recruitment completed, continuing outcome collection, no outcomes analyzed yet.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

696

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108-1532
        • VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on sleep study (sleep provider confirmed)
  • Recent body mass index between 30.0-44.9 kg/m2 and at least one additional plausible BMI in last 12 months
  • Access to DVD player, computer, and/or internet
  • Able to participate fully in all study protocol/procedures including informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to speak, read, or understand English
  • Recent or active weight loss interventions including use of prescription weight-loss medications, participation in group or individual weight loss programs provided by trained personnel, and prior bariatric surgery or plans for bariatric surgery during the study period.
  • Expected weight loss because of alternate explanations such as from illness
  • High variability in weight due to fluctuations in volume status (e.g. ascites - liver disease, chronic heart failure)
  • Safety and/or adherence concerns due to severe physical or mental health issues, or life expectancy <24 months
  • Pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the study period
  • Participation in other intervention studies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: lifestyle intervention
The investigators will provide participants with the behavioral lifestyle intervention in addition to usual care.
Intervention Arm: Usual Care plus a lifestyle behavior change intervention aimed at improving eating habits and increasing physical activity. The lifestyle behavior change intervention encourages participants to gradually achieve and maintain a 5-10% loss of baseline body weight and at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity, such as brisk walking, each week. The lifestyle intervention program consists of watching one video, completing corresponding written self-guided learning materials, and tracking food intake and physical activity each week for the first 12 weeks, then working through 10 additional written handouts and continued food and activity tracking for the next nine months. Intervention participants will have access to a lifestyle coach as desired for the full 12-month intervention period.
No Intervention: usual care control
Participants in this arm will continue with usual care without the lifestyle intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in sleep-related quality of life
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months post randomization

The investigators will compare change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep questionnaire (FOSQ) score between groups.

The minimum value of FOSQ is 5, the maximum is 20, and a higher value indicates a better outcome.

baseline to 12 months post randomization
change in weight
Time Frame: baseline to between 9 and 15 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in weights between intervention and control using clinic weights from VA medical record
baseline to between 9 and 15 months post randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cardiovascular risk scores
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in cardiovascular risk scores between intervention and control using the non-laboratory Framingham algorithm. The minimum value in this risk score is -2, the maximum is 32, and a higher value indicates greater risk of cardiovascular disease (worse outcome).
baseline to 12 months post randomization
PROMIS - Sleep Disturbance Survey change
Time Frame: baseline to 3 months post randomization

The investigators will compare change in sleep-related disturbance between intervention and control using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Sleep Disturbance Survey.

The minimum value for PROMIS Sleep Disturbance is a T-score of 28.9, the maximum is a T-score of 76.5, and a greater value indicates greater sleep disturbance (worse outcome).

baseline to 3 months post randomization
PROMIS - Sleep Related Impairment Survey change
Time Frame: baseline to 3 months post randomization

The investigators will compare change in sleep-related impairment between intervention and control using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) -Sleep Related Impairment Survey.

The minimum value for PROMIS Sleep Related Impairment is a T-score of 30.0, the maximum is a T-score of 80.1, and a greater value indicates greater sleep related impairment (worse outcome).

baseline to 3 months post randomization
systolic blood pressure from VA medical record
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in systolic blood pressure values between intervention and control.
baseline to 12 months post randomization
treatment usage per day
Time Frame: baseline to 3 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in daily OSA treatment usage between groups using self-report.
baseline to 3 months post randomization
apnea hypopnea index 1b criteria
Time Frame: 12 months post randomization
The investigators will conduct home sleep apnea tests among a subset of patients in each group to compare apnea hypopnea index (a physiologic measure of OSA severity) between groups at 12 months. The apnea hypopnea index measures the number of times per hour of sleep in which an individual stops breathing (apnea) or nearly stops breathing (hypopnea). For this outcome, we will measure apneas and hypopneas using the 1B criteria of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
12 months post randomization
longer-term change in weight
Time Frame: baseline to between 18 and 24 months post randomization
The investigators will compare longer-term change in weight between intervention and control using clinic weights from VA medical record
baseline to between 18 and 24 months post randomization
short-term change in sleep-related quality of life
Time Frame: baseline to 3 months post randomization
The investigators will compare short-term change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep questionnaire (FOSQ) between groups. The minimum value of FOSQ is 5, the maximum is 20, and a higher value indicates a better outcome.
baseline to 3 months post randomization
longer-term change in sleep-related quality of life
Time Frame: baseline to 21 months post randomization
The investigators will compare longer-term change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep questionnaire (FOSQ) between groups. The minimum value of FOSQ is 5, the maximum is 20, and a higher value indicates a better outcome.
baseline to 21 months post randomization
Global Rating of Change
Time Frame: 3 months post randomization
The investigators will compare perceived change in symptoms between groups using the single-item patients' global impression of change (PGI-C). PGI-C has been validated in the context of OSA treatment and asks patients to rate symptom changes on a 7 point scale from "1-Very Much Improved" to "7-Very Much Worse".
3 months post randomization
change in self-reported well-being
Time Frame: baseline to 3 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in self-reported well-being between groups. Participants will complete a 3-item Well-being signs (WBS) survey asking them to rate the proportion of time they are satisfied, involved, and functioning their best in activities that they value. The minimum value is 0% and the maximum value is 100%, and a higher value on WBS indicates a better outcome.
baseline to 3 months post randomization
cardiovascular risk scores
Time Frame: baseline to 21 months post randomization
The investigators will compare cardiovascular risk scores between intervention and control using the non-laboratory Framingham algorithm. The minimum value in this risk score is -2, the maximum is 32, and a higher value indicates greater risk of cardiovascular disease (worse outcome).
baseline to 21 months post randomization
PROMIS - Sleep Disturbance Survey change
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months post randomization

The investigators will compare sleep-related disturbance between intervention and control using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Sleep Disturbance Survey.

The minimum value for PROMIS Sleep Disturbance is a T-score of 28.9, the maximum is a T-score of 76.5, and a greater value indicates greater sleep disturbance (worse outcome).

baseline to 12 months post randomization
PROMIS - Sleep Disturbance Survey change
Time Frame: baseline to 21 months post randomization

The investigators will compare sleep-related disturbance between intervention and control using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Sleep Disturbance Survey.

The minimum value for PROMIS Sleep Disturbance is a T-score of 28.9, the maximum is a T-score of 76.5, and a greater value indicates greater sleep disturbance (worse outcome).

baseline to 21 months post randomization
PROMIS - Sleep Related Impairment Survey change
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months post randomization

The investigators will compare sleep-related impairment between intervention and control using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) -Sleep Related Impairment Survey.

The minimum value for PROMIS Sleep Related Impairment is a T-score of 30.0, the maximum is a T-score of 80.1, and a greater value indicates greater sleep related impairment (worse outcome).

baseline to 12 months post randomization
PROMIS - Sleep Related Impairment Survey change
Time Frame: baseline to 21 months post randomization

The investigators will compare sleep-related impairment between intervention and control using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) -Sleep Related Impairment Survey.

The minimum value for PROMIS Sleep Related Impairment is a T-score of 30.0, the maximum is a T-score of 80.1, and a greater value indicates greater sleep related impairment (worse outcome).

baseline to 21 months post randomization
systolic blood pressure from VA medical record
Time Frame: baseline to 21 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in systolic blood pressure values between intervention and control.
baseline to 21 months post randomization
diastolic blood pressure from VA medical record
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in diastolic blood pressure values between intervention and control.
baseline to 12 months post randomization
diastolic blood pressure from VA medical record
Time Frame: baseline to 21 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in diastolic blood pressure values between intervention and control.
baseline to 21 months post randomization
treatment usage per day
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in daily OSA treatment usage between groups using self-report.
baseline to 12 months post randomization
treatment usage per day
Time Frame: baseline to 21 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in daily OSA treatment usage between groups using self-report.
baseline to 21 months post randomization
Global Rating of Change
Time Frame: 12 months post randomization
The investigators will compare perceived change in symptoms between groups using the single-item patients' global impression of change (PGI-C). PGI-C has been validated in the context of OSA treatment and asks patients to rate symptom changes on a 7 point scale from "1-Very Much Improved" to "7-Very Much Worse".
12 months post randomization
Global Rating of Change
Time Frame: 21 months post randomization
The investigators will compare perceived change in symptoms between groups using the single-item patients' global impression of change (PGI-C). PGI-C has been validated in the context of OSA treatment and asks patients to rate symptom changes on a 7 point scale from "1-Very Much Improved" to "7-Very Much Worse".
21 months post randomization
change in self-reported well-being
Time Frame: baseline to 12 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in self-reported well-being between groups. Participants will complete a 3-item Well-being signs (WBS) survey asking them to rate the proportion of time they are satisfied, involved, and functioning their best in activities that they value. The minimum value is 0% and the maximum value is 100%, and a higher value on WBS indicates a better outcome.
baseline to 12 months post randomization
change in self-reported well-being
Time Frame: baseline to 21 months post randomization
The investigators will compare change in self-reported well-being between groups. Participants will complete a 3-item Well-being signs (WBS) survey asking them to rate the proportion of time they are satisfied, involved, and functioning their best in activities that they value. The minimum value is 0% and the maximum value is 100%, and a higher value on WBS indicates a better outcome.
baseline to 21 months post randomization
apnea hypopnea index 1a criteria
Time Frame: 12 months post randomization
The investigators will conduct home sleep apnea tests among a subset of patients in each group to compare apnea hypopnea index (a physiologic measure of OSA severity) between groups at 12 months. The apnea hypopnea index measures the number of times per hour of sleep in which an individual stops breathing (apnea) or nearly stops breathing (hypopnea). For this outcome, we will measure apneas and hypopneas using the 1A criteria of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
12 months post randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucas M Donovan, MD MS, VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Clinical Trials on lifestyle intervention

3
Subscribe