Esophagus-sparing Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. (ESO-SPARE)

August 14, 2023 updated by: Anna Mann Nielsen, Herlev Hospital

ESO-SPARE: Esophagus Sparring Radiotherapy for Thoracic and Cervical Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. A Randomized Phase III Study.

Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is a serious complication to metastatic cancer and when diagnosed life expectancy is short. Treatment is palliative radiotherapy (RT). Early esophageal toxicity is underreported but can seriously impact quality of life (QoL).

The aim of the ESO-SPARE trial is to investigate if esophagus sparing RT can decrease patient reported esophageal toxicity without compromising ambulatory function or increase other toxicities.

200 patients with MSCC in the thoracic or cervical spine referred for RT will be randomized to either standard or esophagus/pharynx sparing RT. Subsequently participants will be followed with PROM (Patient Reported Outcome Measures) for 9 weeks. PROM-CTCAE questionnaires on upper GI toxicity and pain will be collected daily for 5 weeks and weekly for 4 weeks. Questionnaires evaluating QoL and physical function will be collected weekly for 9 weeks.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histology or cytology proven cancer
  • Referred for palliative radiotherapy of the cervical or thoracic vertebra for

    • epidural ingrowth
    • metastatic spinal cord compression
    • metastatic spinal nerve root compression
    • post-operative radiotherapy after decompressive surgery for spinal cord or nerve root compression
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
  • Referred for the following dose prescriptions 5 Gy x 5, 5 Gy x 4, 3 Gy x 10, 10 Gy x 1, 8 Gy x 1.
  • ≥ 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Referred for > 10 fractions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Arm A: standard radiotherapy treatment
Patients in arm A will receive standard radiotherapy treatment for metastatic spinal cord compression.
Experimental: Arm B: esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment
Patients in arm B will receive esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment.
A radiotherapy plan for metastatic spinal cord compression is conducted with specific constrains sparring the esophagus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early patient reported gastro-oesophageal toxicity
Time Frame: Measured within the first 5 weeks after treatment start
Measured as a peak score using CTCAE Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Measured within the first 5 weeks after treatment start
Ambulatory function
Time Frame: Measured 9 weeks after treatment start
Preserved ability to walk will be evaluated using the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) mobility dimension. The EQ-5D includes one question for each of the five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five response levels: no problems (Level 1); slight; moderate; severe; and extreme problems (Level 5).
Measured 9 weeks after treatment start

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of gastro-oesophageal toxicity
Time Frame: Assessed 9 weeks after treatment start
Measured as the time from an increase in gastro-oesophageal symptom score to a return to baseline
Assessed 9 weeks after treatment start
Reirradiation rate - Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Assessed 6 months after inclusion of the last patient.
Defined as fraction of patients getting reirradiation, where the same spine levels are included in the irradiated volume
Assessed 6 months after inclusion of the last patient.
Patient reported physical function
Time Frame: Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Patient reported physical function will be assessed using answers from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Questions regarding physical function are measured on a four-point scale (1= not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much). All EORTC QLQ-C30 answers will be scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual.
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Health related Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks

Health related quality of life measured with EQ-5D-5L European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).

The EQ-5D includes one question for each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five response levels: no problems (Level 1); slight; moderate; severe; and extreme problems (Level 5). Health state scores are defined by combining one level from each dimension, ranging from 11111 (full health) to 55555 (worst health).

A visual analogue scale indicating the respondent's own assessment of their health status from 0-100 is also included (100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = the worst health you can imagine).

Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Health related Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Health related quality of life assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaire - Cancer (QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions assessing quality of life issues using a four-point scale (1= not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much) except from the last two questions which are measured between 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent). The EORTC QLQ-C30 will be scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual.
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Weight
Time Frame: Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Analgesic consumption
Time Frame: Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks
Pain (MSCC site)
Time Frame: Assessed daily for 5 weeks and subsequently weekly for 4 weeks.

Evaluated by "Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)"

The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Assessed daily for 5 weeks and subsequently weekly for 4 weeks.
Pain assessment (MTS site)
Time Frame: Best response during 9 weeks of follow-up

Assessment will be performed using International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints (ICPRE).

  • A complete pain response is defined as a pain score of 0 out of 10 at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake
  • A partial pain response is defined as a pain reduction of 2 or more at the treated site without analgesic increase, or an analgesic reduction of 25% with no increase in pain score or 1 point above baseline.
  • Pain progression is defined as an increase in pain score of 2 or more above baseline with stable analgesic intake or an analgesic increase of 25% with stable pain score.
  • An indeterminate response is any response not captured in the above definitions.

Analysis of pain reduction will only include patients with NPRS ≥ 1 registered at baseline. We intend to report the best response during follow-up.

Best response during 9 weeks of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophagitis

Clinical Trials on Esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment

3
Subscribe