BESTMED: Observational Evaluation of Second Line Therapy Medications in Diabetes (BESTMED)

June 16, 2023 updated by: Alexander Turchin, Brigham and Women's Hospital
An observational study of electronic patient data to compare diabetes medications and to determine which ones offer the best balance of risks and benefits.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Type 2 diabetes is an increasingly common disease that affects more than 10 percent of adults in the United States. Multiple medications are available to treat this condition. However, many of these medications have never been directly compared against one another, which makes it unclear which medication is the best to use.

Investigators will use a large database of electronic patient data to compare diabetes medications to determine which ones offer the best balance of risks and benefits. This database will draw from several large healthcare institutions and health insurance companies that collectively pull from a patient population of over 130 million across all major regions of the United States. Investigators will study adults aged 30 or older who have type 2 diabetes and are at moderate risk of heart attacks and strokes, and who are starting a second diabetes medication (after metformin). Investigators will use clinical trial emulation, a cutting-edge statistical technique, to compare the following classes of diabetes medications: (1) DPP4 inhibitors (alogliptin, linagliptin, sitagliptin, or saxagliptin); (2) GLP1 receptor agonists (dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide); (3) basal insulin (degludec, detemir, glargine, or NPH); (4) SGLT2 inhibitors (canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, or ertugliflozin); and (5) sulfonylureas (glimepiride, glipizide, or glyburide).

To determine which diabetes medications provide the greatest benefit to patients, investigators will compare how much they reduce the risks of the following \conditions: (1) heart attack; (2) heart failure; (3) stroke; (4) kidney disease; (5) eye disease; and (6) liver disease. To allow patients with diabetes and their doctors to make fully informed decisions about which diabetes medication to take, investigators will also compare these medications' risks of the following possible side effects: (1) low blood sugar; (2) kidney infection; (3) severe skin infections in the genital area; (4) foot/leg amputations; (5) broken bones; (6) pancreatitis (i.e., severe inflammation of the pancreas); (7) pancreatic cancer; (8) thyroid cancer; and (9) death from causes other than heart attacks or strokes.

In order to minimize the risk of bias and confounding, the analysis will be conducted using causal inference techniques, by emulating a randomized clinical trial (including both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses), while incorporating rigorous data quality checks.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

550000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Delaware
      • Wilmington, Delaware, United States, 19801
        • Recruiting
        • HealthCore, Inc.
        • Contact:
          • Vincent Willey, PharmD
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40512-4611
        • Recruiting
        • Humana
        • Contact:
          • Vinit Nair, MS, RPh
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Alexander Turchin, MD, MS
    • Ohio
      • Beachwood, Ohio, United States, 44122
        • Recruiting
        • Greater Plains Collaborative
        • Contact:
          • Ryan Carnahan, PhD
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Recruiting
        • Baylor Scott & White
        • Contact:
          • Heather Kitzman Carmichael, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population is adults aged 30 or older who have type 2 diabetes and are at moderate risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD), and who are starting a second diabetes medication (after metformin). Patients from collaborating institutions will be included in the analysis based on study population inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Description

Individuals meeting the following criteria between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2021:

  • Diabetes mellitus (DM) type II
  • HbA1c of 7-11% within the past year
  • Monotherapy with metformin for at least 3 months
  • No prior non-metformin outpatient diabetes therapy
  • Aged ≥30y
  • At "moderate" risk of ASCVD

    • Men aged ≥35y and women aged ≥45y with no history* of stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization, or heart failure hospitalization
    • Men aged 30-34 and women aged 30-44 with history* of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, retinopathy, kidney disease or neuropathy
  • estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 ml/min/1.73m2 within the past 3 years
  • Not pregnant at time 0
  • No history* of institutionalization with a diagnosis of dementia, metastatic cancer, end stage lung disease, end stage liver disease, pancreatitis, medullary thyroid cancer or severe UTIs
  • Engagement with the healthcare system: enrollment for at least 12 months and attendance of at least one outpatient encounter in the prior 12 months

(*) History will be derived from at least 12 months of EHR and claims prior to time zero and will use all available EHR and claims data between January 1, 2014 and time zero

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
DPP4
Patients receiving second line diabetes treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4) following metformin
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4) including alogliptin, linagliptin, sitagliptin, and saxagliptin
GLP1-RA
Patients receiving second line diabetes treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) following metformin
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) including dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide and semaglutide
Basal insulin
Patients receiving second line diabetes treatment with basal insulin following metformin
degludec, detemir, glargine and NPH
SLGT2
Patients receiving second line diabetes treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SLGT2) following metformin
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SLGT2) including canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and ertugliflozin
SU
Patients receiving second line diabetes treatment with sulfonylureas (SU) following metformin
Sulfonylurea (SU) including glimepiride, glipizide, and glyburide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
4-point major adverse cardiac events (MACE)
Time Frame: Follow-up begins 30 days after enrollment and ends at the earliest of a) the first study outcome; b) study end or c) loss to follow-up. Maximum duration of follow-up will be 10.5 years.
Includes: a) death from cardiovascular causes b) non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) c) non-fatal stroke and d) hospitalization for heart failure (HF)
Follow-up begins 30 days after enrollment and ends at the earliest of a) the first study outcome; b) study end or c) loss to follow-up. Maximum duration of follow-up will be 10.5 years.
3-point major adverse cardiac events (MACE)
Time Frame: Follow-up begins 30 days after enrollment and ends at the earliest of a) the first study outcome; b) study end or c) loss to follow-up. Maximum duration of follow-up will be 10.5 years.
Includes: a) death from cardiovascular causes as reported in the National Death Index b) non-fatal MI and c) non-fatal stroke
Follow-up begins 30 days after enrollment and ends at the earliest of a) the first study outcome; b) study end or c) loss to follow-up. Maximum duration of follow-up will be 10.5 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse outcomes
Time Frame: Follow-up begins 30 days after enrollment and ends at the earliest of a) the first study outcome; b) study end or c) loss to follow-up. Maximum duration of follow-up will be 10.5 years.
Includes a) severe hypoglycemia b) severe urinary tract infection (UTI) c) Fournier's gangrene d) lower extremity amputation e) bone fracture f) diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) g) pancreatitis h) pancreatic cancer i) medullary thyroid cancer j) non-cardiovascular death
Follow-up begins 30 days after enrollment and ends at the earliest of a) the first study outcome; b) study end or c) loss to follow-up. Maximum duration of follow-up will be 10.5 years.
Severe clinical outcomes
Time Frame: Follow-up begins 30 days after enrollment and ends at the earliest of a) the first study outcome; b) study end or c) loss to follow-up. Maximum duration of follow-up will be 10.5 years.
Includes: a) hospitalization for >= 30 days with any of the primary or secondary outcome endpoints as the primary or admitting diagnosis b) ICU admission with any of the primary or secondary outcome endpoints as the primary or admitting diagnosis or c) death from any cause
Follow-up begins 30 days after enrollment and ends at the earliest of a) the first study outcome; b) study end or c) loss to follow-up. Maximum duration of follow-up will be 10.5 years.
Non-cardiovascular outcomes
Time Frame: Follow-up begins 30 days after enrollment and ends at the earliest of a) the first study outcome; b) study end or c) loss to follow-up. Maximum duration of follow-up will be 10.5 years.
Includes a) nephropathy b) diabetic retinopathy requiring treatment c) non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with advanced fibrosis / nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)
Follow-up begins 30 days after enrollment and ends at the earliest of a) the first study outcome; b) study end or c) loss to follow-up. Maximum duration of follow-up will be 10.5 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on DPP4

3
Subscribe