Task Training In Older Adults With Age-Related Hearing Loss

September 28, 2023 updated by: HANDE USTA, Pamukkale University

Investigation Of the Effects Of Dual-Task And Single-Task Training In Older Adults With Age-Related Hearing Loss

This study aimed to examine the effects of single and dual-task training on physical function, cognitive function, quality of life, balance, concerns about falling, and activities of daily living in the elderly with age-related hearing loss.

The elderly who were diagnosed with age-related hearing loss in Pamukkale University Health, Practice and Research Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology participated in the study. The elderly were allocated a single-task training group, dual-task training group, and control group. Thirteen patients in the single-task training group, 15 patients in the dual-task training group, 14 patients in the control group completed the study. Degrees of hearing loss were determined by pure tone audiometry. Evaluations, Senior Fitness Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, World Health Organization- Quality of Life- Old Module, Berg Balance Scale, Falls Efficacy Scale International, Functional Independence Measure, Dual Task Questionnaire, Dual Task Effect, were performed initially, after the interventions and at the 6th month. The interventions were carried out two days a week and 40 minutes, for five weeks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Outcome Measures Physical function, cognitive function, auditory function, quality of life, balance, concerns about falling, independence in activities of daily living, and dual-task performance were evaluated. Older adults were evaluated initially, after the dual-task and single-task training, and at 6th month for long-term control. All evaluations and interventions were carried out in an isolated and quiet environment in the examination room of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology.

Interventions A special program including motor and cognitive tasks was prepared. Both lower and upper extremity motor tasks and verbal, arithmetic, auditory, and visual cognitive tasks were planned based on evidence. Tasks were completed at the same time in the dual-task training group, were completed separately in the single-task training group. No intervention was performed in the control group. The dual-task and single-task training were held 2 days a week, 40 minutes, for a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. A patient-appropriate task was selected for each cognitive task each week. It has been tried to prevent the learning effect by providing individual and weekly progress according to the patients' performance in the tasks in the motor and cognitive parts. Variable priority instructions were used in the dual-task training group, and fixed priority instructions were used in the single-task training group. At the beginning and end of the intervention programs, 7 types of warm-up and cool-down exercises involving large muscle groups were performed for 10-minutes. Each task in the intervention programs was performed for 60 seconds and/or 10 repetitions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kinikli
      • Denizli, Kinikli, Turkey, 20070
        • Pamukkale University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being >65 years old
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale score > 21
  • Diagnosed with Age-Related Hearing Loss
  • Having bilateral symmetrical hearing loss (average ±10dB difference)
  • Having normal visual functions
  • Ability to ambulate independently (may use a self-help device)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Using a hearing aid
  • Receiving a physical therapy intervention for Age-Related Hearing Loss
  • Having an orthopedic or neurological condition that may affect cognition or postural control
  • Using medication that may affect cognition or postural control
  • Having vertigo or being hospitalized in the emergency room due to vertigo attacks
  • Missing or refusing the follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: single-task training group
Tasks were completed separately in the single-task training group
A special program including motor and cognitive tasks was prepared. Both lower and upper extremity motor tasks and verbal, arithmetic, auditory, and visual cognitive tasks were planned based on evidence. The dual-task and single-task training were held 2 days a week, 40 minutes, for a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. A patient-appropriate task was selected for each cognitive task each week.
Experimental: dual-task training group
Tasks were completed at the same time in the dual-task training group
A special program including motor and cognitive tasks was prepared. Both lower and upper extremity motor tasks and verbal, arithmetic, auditory, and visual cognitive tasks were planned based on evidence. The dual-task and single-task training were held 2 days a week, 40 minutes, for a total of 10 sessions for 5 weeks. A patient-appropriate task was selected for each cognitive task each week.
No Intervention: control group
No intervention was performed in the control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Senior Fitness Test
Time Frame: Initially, 1st week
This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests
Initially, 1st week
Senior Fitness Test
Time Frame: At 5th week
This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests
At 5th week
Senior Fitness Test
Time Frame: Through study completion at 6th month
This test is valid in the elderly population and provides comprehensive, continuous measurement, consisting of 6 sub-heading, including chair stand, arm curl, 2-minute step, chair sit-and-reach, back scratch, and 8-foot-up-and-go tests
Through study completion at 6th month
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: Initially, 1st week
It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal
Initially, 1st week
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: At 5th week
It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal
At 5th week
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: Through study completion at 6th month
It evaluates 8 different cognitive functions: visuospatial/executive functions, naming, attention, concentration and calculation, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. The highest score is 30 in total. A score of 21 and above is considered normal
Through study completion at 6th month
Pure tone audiometry
Time Frame: Initially, 1st week
Pure tone audiometry at 6 different frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 kHz) frequently mentioned in the literature was performed by an audiologist with a clinical audiometer
Initially, 1st week
World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module
Time Frame: Initially, 1st week
It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.
Initially, 1st week
World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module
Time Frame: At 5th week
It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.
At 5th week
World Health Organization Quality of Life - Old Module
Time Frame: Through study completion at 6th month
It consists of 24 items in six facets. The facets of this module are "sensory abilities", "autonomy", "past, present and future activities", "social participation", "death and death", "intimacy". A high score indicates a high quality of life.
Through study completion at 6th month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Initially, 1st week
It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance
Initially, 1st week
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: At 5th week
It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance
At 5th week
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion at 6th month
It was designed to assess balance and determine fall risk in older adults (Berg et al, 1989). It is a scale that includes 14 instructions and is scored between 0 and 4 by observing the performance of the person for each instruction. The highest score is 56, 0-20 points indicate balance disorder, 21-40 points indicate that balance is maintained with assistance, and 41-56 points indicate the existence of a good balance
Through study completion at 6th month
International Fall Efficiency Scale
Time Frame: Initially, 1st week
: It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established
Initially, 1st week
International Fall Efficiency Scale
Time Frame: At 5th week
: It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established
At 5th week
International Fall Efficiency Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion at 6th month
: It is a patient-rated scale that determines the level of concerns about falling in activities. of daily living and the confidence to perform activities without fear of falling. It was developed by Tinetti et al. in 1990. The 16 questions in the scale were scored between 1-4. Validity and reliability studies have been established
Through study completion at 6th month
Functional Independence Measurement
Time Frame: Initially, 1st week
FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.
Initially, 1st week
Functional Independence Measurement
Time Frame: At 5th week
FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.
At 5th week
Functional Independence Measurement
Time Frame: Through study completion at 6th month
FIM was developed in 1987 and it indicates the degree of independence of a person in activities of daily living. The instrument includes 18 items under 6 subheadings: self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition. Each item is scored at 7 levels, with 'level 1' representing full assistance and 'level 7' representing complete independence. The total score is between 18-126.
Through study completion at 6th month
Dual Task Questionnaire
Time Frame: Initially, 1st week
: DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.
Initially, 1st week
Dual Task Questionnaire
Time Frame: At 5th week
: DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.
At 5th week
Dual Task Questionnaire
Time Frame: Through study completion at 6th month
: DTQ is used to provide information about the difficulties experienced in dual tasks related to daily living activities. It is a short test consisting of 10 questions. It has been used in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. It consists of 5 answers and is scored between 0-4. A score of "4" indicates that difficulties are experienced very often, and "0" indicates that there is no difficulty.
Through study completion at 6th month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: HANDE USTA, PHD, Pamukkale University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 23, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on TASK TRAINING

3
Subscribe