Safety and Efficacy of Low Dose MM120 for ADHD Proof of Concept Trial

February 9, 2026 updated by: Definium Therapeutics US, Inc.

Safety and Efficacy of Repeated Low Dose d-Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) D-tartrate (MM120) as Treatment for ADHD in Adults: a Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 2a Proof of Concept Trial

This study measures the safety and efficacy of repeated low dose MM120 as treatment for ADHD in adults: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2a study of low dose MM120 (20 μg) compared with a placebo administered for 6 weeks (twice a week on a 3/4-day schedule).

Low dose MM120 (20 μg) is about 20% of the dose typically consumed for recreational psychedelic purposes.

There will be a 1:1 randomization, double-blind, to MM120 or placebo with the aim to reach 26 evaluable patients in each of the 2 arms at Week 6.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • Maastricht University
      • Basel, Switzerland
        • University Hospital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female outpatients ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years of age at Screening
  • Patients with the diagnosis of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) ADHD, as determined by clinical evaluation and confirmed by structured interview (MINI).
  • Adequate organ function.
  • Able to understand the study procedures and understand risks associated with the study, and sign written informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Must be willing to refrain from more than 6 standard alcoholic drinks a week, more than 10 cigarettes a day, and more than 2 cups of coffee a day throughout the study treatment period (6 weeks) and until the last study visit is complete.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Past or present diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder or first degree relative with a psychotic disorder.
  • Past or present bipolar disorder (DSM-5).
  • Any lifetime history of suicide attempt.
  • Once Informed Consent form is signed, not willing or able to stop any prescription or non-prescription ADHD medications.
  • Use of investigational medication/treatment in the past 30 days.
  • Patients with a positive urine drug screen with the exception of THC or its metabolites.
  • Pregnant or nursing females.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Arm 1- Placebo
A total of 26 patients will receive a placebo identical in appearance to the investigational medicinal product (IMP) administered orally twice weekly (e.g., Tuesday/Friday) for 6 weeks.
A treatment which is designed to have no therapeutic value.
Experimental: Arm 2- MM120
A total of 26 patients will receive 20 μg of MM120 administered orally twice weekly for 6 weeks.
MM120 is a psychedelic drug that can cause intensified thoughts, emotions, and sensory perception. At sufficiently high dosages MM120 manifests primarily visual, as well as auditory, hallucinations.
Other Names:
  • MM-120
  • DT120
  • lysergide tartrate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Symptoms
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Adult ADHD investigator symptom rating scale (AISRS) total score consists of 18 items from the original Attention-deficit/hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS). The ADHD-RS includes 9 items that address symptoms of inattention, and 9 items that address symptoms of impulsivity and hyperactivity. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS total score can range from 0 to 54. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) Symptoms
Time Frame: Week 2
The Adult ADHD investigator symptom rating scale (AISRS) total score consists of 18 items from the original Attention-deficit/hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS). The ADHD-RS includes 9 items that address symptoms of inattention, and 9 items that address symptoms of impulsivity and hyperactivity. Each item is rated from 0 to 3. The AISRS total score can range from 0 to 54. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD.
Week 2
Number of Patients Who Experience a Decrease in the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI-S)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, Week 10
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) was used to assess the subject's current severity of illness at the time of the assessment relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. The CGI-S comprises 1 Investigator-completed (or trained rater-completed) item with 7 possible ratings (1-7 points), where a higher score indicates more severe illness.
Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, Week 10
Change From Baseline in in Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI-S)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) was used to assess the subject's current severity of illness at the time of the assessment relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. The CGI-S comprises 1 Investigator-completed (or trained rater-completed) item with 7 possible ratings (1-7 points), where a higher score indicates more severe illness.
Baseline, Week 2, Week 6
Adult Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-reporting Rating Scale (ASRS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Reporting Rating Scale (ASRS) is composed of 18 questions, and uses a scale that ranges from 0-4 based on the individuals mark in either the "never, rarely, sometimes, often, very often" column for a possible total score of 72. A higher score corresponds to a worse severity of ADHD.
6 weeks
Change From Baseline in Connors' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Connors' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS) Self-Report Long Form is a 66-item measure of ADHD symptom. Responses are scored on a 4-point scale, where 0 = not at all, 1 = just a little, 2 = pretty much, and 3 = very much. Item scores are summed to three main scores which are then transformed using population-derived age- and sex-adjusted norm values to a T-score. A T-score < 60 indicates no ADHD. A T-score of 60-64 indicates borderline ADHD. A T-score of > 64 indicates ADHD.
6 weeks
5 Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness Questionnaire (5D-ASC) Scores
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The 5 dimensions of altered states of consciousness (5D-ASC) scale is a visual analog scale (VAS) consisting of 94 items each scored on a 0-100mm VAS extrapolated to 100% scale for quantitative evaluation. These 94 items are categorized into five dimensions: oceanic boundlessness (min:0, max:2700), anxious ego dissolution (min:0, max:2100), visionary destructuralization (min:0, max:1800), auditory alterations (min:0, max:1600), and vigilance reduction (min:0, max:1200). The total score is the sum of all questions and can range from 0 to 9400. Higher scores = more alteration in state of consciousness.
6 weeks
Mystical Experience Questionnaire 30 Items (MEQ30)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Mystical Experience Questionnaire 30 item (MEQ30) is a 30-item questionnaire rated on a six-point scale. The scale has been used to assess mystical experiences in studies using psilocybin and LSD. Higher scores = greater mystical experiences. The total score is expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score (0 to 100%).
6 weeks
Summary of Drug Effects Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 6 hours
A series of single item visual Analog Scales (VAS) are used repeatedly 0 -6 hours after drug administration: The following 9 items were used in VAS (0-100 mm): "any drug effect", "good drug effect", bad drug effect", "drug liking", "fear", nausea", "alteration of vision", "alteration of sense of time", and "the boundaries between myself and my surroundings seem to blur". VAS scores range from 0 = no effect to 100 = strong effect. The scores for each item are extrapolated to a 100% scale and presented for each time point of assessment.
6 hours

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetic Outcomes
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 hours post-dose
Maximum Plasma Concentration [Cmax] of MM-120 in the blood at Week 1 Day 1
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 hours post-dose
Pharmacokinetic Parameters (Cmax)
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 hours post-dose
Maximum concentration (Cmax)
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 hours post-dose
Pharmacokinetic Parameters (Tmax and t1/2)
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 hours post-dose
Time to maximum concentration (Tmax), half life (t1/2)
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 hours post-dose
Pharmacokinetic Parameters (AUC0-inf and AUC0-6h)
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 hours post-dose
Area under the concentration curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf), Area under the concentration curve from time 0 to 6 hour (AUC0-6h)
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 hours post-dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthias Liechti, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
  • Principal Investigator: Kim Kuypers, Maastricht University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 6, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADHD

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe