Opiate Sparing Protocol Randomized Controlled Trial in Open Distal Radius Fracture Repair

August 3, 2023 updated by: William Jacob Weller, Campbell Clinic

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Opiate Sparing Protocol Versus Standard Opiate Based Protocol Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

A comparison of oral morphine equivalents between an opiate sparing cohort and an opiate based cohort following open reduction internal fixation of a distal radius fracture.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

Recently, the opioid epidemic has been the center of focus for healthcare providers and governmental agencies due to rising rates of opioid abuse, opioid-related fatalities, and overall economic burden of treating the opioid epidemic. The prescribing patterns of opioid pain medications have fallen under scrutiny and healthcare providers have sought alternative pain management strategies that have limited opioid pain medication use. As orthopaedic surgeons account for 7.7% of all dispensed opioid prescriptions within the United States, surgeons have investigated multimodal pain management strategies to assess effectiveness in controlling postoperative pain as well as limiting opioid use and opioid related complications. The literature documents the safety and effectiveness of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and acetaminophen in soft tissue hand procedures and distal radius fracture plating. Currently, there remains no clear consensus on the ideal pain management strategy following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures and the vast majority of strategies are based on opiate-driven protocols. This study will investigate the effectiveness of an opiate sparing protocol following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures on opiate consumption as measured by oral morphine equivalents at the 2, 6 and 12 week postoperative time point through collection of pill counts. Secondary outcomes are pain scores, patient satisfaction, and safety reporting (complications, reoperations, and readmissions) during the 12-week episode-of-care. This study will document the safety and effectiveness of an opiate sparing, multimodal pain management protocol in properly selected patients undergoing ORIF of distal radius fractures.

Following written consent documentation, Subjects will be randomized to either the opiate sparing cohort or the opiate based cohort at a 1:1 randomization. No blinding will occur as part of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Germantown, Tennessee, United States, 38138
        • Campbell Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Open reduction internal fixation surgery at Campbell Clinic Surgery Center
  • Body Mass Index less than or equal to 45
  • Fluent in verbal and written English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known sensitivity to medications in either protocol
  • Renal disease by medical history
  • Concomitant ipsilateral upper extremity injury or condition other than wrist
  • Chronic pain syndrome
  • Consumption of ten consecutive day so opioid use in the previous 90 days
  • Worker's compensation
  • Women who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or are breastfeeding
  • Takes either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blockers for hypertension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Opiate Sparing
Standard icing and elevation therapy Acetaminophen 1000 milligrams by mouth every 8 hours for five days then as needed every 8 hours for pain control Gabapentin 100 milligrams by mouth three times per day for 14 days Celecoxib 100 milligrams by mouth two times per day for 5 days Esomeprazole 20 milligrams by mouth once per day for 14 days Promethazine 12.5 milligrams by mouth every 8 hours as needed for nausea or vomiting Docusate 100 milligrams by mouth two times per day while taking oxycodone Oxycodone 5 milligrams by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain control unresponsive to other medications
Subjects will receive non-opiate medications for pain control
Active Comparator: Opiate Based
Standard icing and elevation therapy Oxycodone 5-10 milligrams by mouth every 4 to 6 hours as needed for pain control Acetaminophen 1000 milligrams by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain control Promethazine 12.5 milligrams by mouth every 8 hours as needed for nausea or vomiting Docusate 100 milligrams by mouth two times per day while taking oxycodone
Subjects will receive opiate based medications for pain control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral Morphine Equivalent
Time Frame: postoperative day to two week visit
opiate pill count
postoperative day to two week visit
Oral Morphine Equivalent
Time Frame: two week to six week visit
opiate pill count
two week to six week visit
Oral Morphine Equivalent
Time Frame: six week to twelve week visit
opiate pill count
six week to twelve week visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Score
Time Frame: postoperative day to two week visit
Patient reported pain score from 0 to 10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the most pain
postoperative day to two week visit
Visual Analog Score
Time Frame: six week visit
Patient reported pain score from 0 to 10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the most pain
six week visit
Visual Analog Score
Time Frame: twelve week visit
Patient reported pain score from 0 to 10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the most pain
twelve week visit

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse event
Time Frame: postoperative day to two week visit
monitoring for safety events
postoperative day to two week visit
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse event
Time Frame: two week to six week visit
monitoring for safety events
two week to six week visit
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse event
Time Frame: six week to twelve week visit
monitoring for safety events
six week to twelve week visit
Patient satisfaction Score
Time Frame: postoperative day to two week visit
patient reported satisfaction with pain management from 0 to 10 where 0 is very unsatisfied and 10 is very satisfied
postoperative day to two week visit
Patient satisfaction Score
Time Frame: two week to six week visit
patient reported satisfaction with pain management from 0 to 10 where 0 is very unsatisfied and 10 is very satisfied
two week to six week visit
Patient satisfaction Score
Time Frame: six week to twelve week visit
patient reported satisfaction with pain management from 0 to 10 where 0 is very unsatisfied and 10 is very satisfied
six week to twelve week visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William J Weller, MD, Campbell Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Radius Fracture

Clinical Trials on Opiate Sparing

3
Subscribe