Evaluating Patient Reported Outcomes in Radiation Therapy, The PRO-RT Study

April 9, 2024 updated by: Mayo Clinic

Patient Reported Outcomes in Radiation Therapy (PRO-RT)

This study explores the use of the Hugo platform to involve study participants in their healthcare and treatments. The Hugo platform may allow researchers to collect better and more accurate real-time health data, from other clinics/hospitals, pharmacies and other electronic devices. The purpose of this research is to see if the use of the Hugo platform is consistent, accurate, cost effective, and time efficient, as it collects and transmits important real-time health information from other clinics/hospitals, pharmacies, and other electronic devices.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Evaluate the data aggregation from a patient centered platform over a follow up period for completeness and quality, including externally linked electronic health record (EHR) information, toxicity completion, and the patient reported outcomes (PRO) response rates for study patients, compared with historical pre-coronavirus disease (COVID) cohort of registry patients.

II. To explore biometric information obtained from wearables as it pertains to the toxicity of treatment for patients using a wearable device.

III. To estimate app-based survey completion rates using Hugo-based survey incentive completion (gift cards).

IV. To explore the cost data available on the platform.

OUTLINE:

Patients complete surveys via the Hugo Platform at baseline (before treatment), after treatment, and at 3 and 6 months after treatment. Patients' medical records and Fitbit information are also collected into the Hugo Platform.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with breast, head and neck, and lung tumor types, who are undergoing simulation for treatment in the Radiation Oncology Department at Mayo Clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18+
  • English speaking
  • Consented for Outcomes Registry Study (15-000136)
  • Undergoing radiotherapy for cancer treatment with curative intent
  • Willing to and able to give consent and participate in study
  • Willing to complete all surveys
  • Able to access a device (computer, smartphone, or tablet) with web access every day to complete study surveys
  • Willing to connect to a device (i.e., a smartphone, Fitbit, or tablet) that can regularly link to Hugo for data transfer
  • Willing to share personal information to Tremendous to be able to obtain the Visa e-cards for time and effort put into this study
  • Willing to use the Hugo health data sharing platform
  • Willing to create a Mayo Clinic Patient Portal (if not already created)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give consent and enroll prior to administration of baseline survey
  • Partial breast radiation therapy (RT) (3 fraction), due to overlap in cadence used for all disease sites
  • Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the lung, due to overlap in cadence used for all disease sites
  • Co-enrollment on another PRO related study (soft rule)

    • Coordinator would need to get source data from Adam via Hugo
    • Response data will only be accessible by select people

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Observational (surveys, medical records & Fitbit collection)
Patients complete surveys via the Hugo Platform at baseline (before treatment), after treatment, and at 3 and 6 months after treatment. Patients' medical records and Fitbit information are also collected into the Hugo Platform.
Complete surveys
Medical records are collected
Fitbit information is collected

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survey completion rate
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after completion of radiation therapy
The difference in rates will be estimated. A chi square, or Fisher's exact test as appropriate, will be used to compare the rates between cohorts. A logistic regression model will be used to understand the association of patient and disease variables with the odds of completion (at least one of the surveys at the treated site).
Baseline up to 6 months after completion of radiation therapy
Percentage of patients with access to wearable device
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after completion of radiation therapy
A logistic regression model will be used to understand the association of patient and disease variables with the odds of access to a wearable device.
Up to 6 months after completion of radiation therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after completion of radiation therapy
Logistic regression will be used to predict presence of a patient toxicity. Baseline patient and disease characteristics, along with biometric information will be used to assess associations with toxicity. Multiple variable models will be considered depending on the number of patients identified with a toxicity.
Up to 6 months after completion of radiation therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kimberly S. Corbin, M.D., Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ROR2103 (Mayo Clinic in Rochester)
  • NCI-2021-12580 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Solid Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Survey Administration

3
Subscribe