Propofol/Dexmedetomidine Versus Desflurane Effects on Post Hepatectomy Hepatocellular Injury

January 15, 2023 updated by: Ain Shams University
This study will compare the effects of propofol/dexmedetomidine versus desflurane for maintenance of general anesthesia on hepatocellular injury in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Postoperative impairment of liver function is common after hepatectomy. It may be caused by surgical trauma, loss of hepatic mass, stress response, hepatic oxygen deprivation, infection and drug toxicity.

Anesthetic agents used in general anesthesia for liver surgery have a big effect on hepatic blood flow, oxygen delivery and liver function This study will compare the effects of propofol/dexmedetomidine versus desflurane for maintenance of general anesthesia on hepatocellular injury in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11591
        • Recruiting
        • Ain Shams University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I to II.
  2. Patients Child Pugh classification A to B.
  3. Both sexes.
  4. Aged between 18 years and 70 years
  5. Scheduled for more than 1 segment hepatectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with Child Pugh classification C.
  2. Patients younger than18 years old or older than 70 years old
  3. Patients performed additional ablation therapies (cryosurgery or radiofrequency ablation).
  4. Prior liver resection for donation.
  5. Scheduled resection not requiring inflow occlusion (Pringle's maneuver).
  6. Hypersensitivity to any of the used drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: propofol and dexmedetomidine
Patients will receive maintenance of general anesthesia by TIVA using combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine
Patients will receive maintenance of general anesthesia by TIVA using combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine.
Other Names:
  • TIVA
Experimental: desflurane
Patients will receive maintenance of general anesthesia by desflurane.
Patients will receive maintenance of general anesthesia by desflurane.
Other Names:
  • inhalational anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
aspartate aminotransferase (AST)
Time Frame: 1 week
aspartate aminotransferase (AST)
1 week
alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
Time Frame: 1 week
alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
1 week
bilirubin
Time Frame: 1 week
bilirubin
1 week
albumin
Time Frame: 1 week
albumin
1 week
prothrombin time
Time Frame: 1 week
prothrombin time
1 week
INR
Time Frame: 1 week
INR
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hany Alzahaby, Professor, Ain Shams University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

open source

IPD Sharing Time Frame

2 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

open source

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatectomy

Clinical Trials on Propofol, dexmedetomidine

3
Subscribe