Long-term Follow-up of Patients Included in the EYE-TAR(MA) Study.

Long-term Follow-up of Patients Included in the EYE-TAR(MA) Study: Rehabilitation of Facial Emotion Recognition in Alzheimer's Disease and Study of the Consequences on Gaze Strategy, Behavior Disorders and Family Caregivers' Burden

EYE-TAR(MA)-Follow-Up is a non-interventionel, long-term follow-up study in subjects who participated to the study referred as EYE-TAR(MA) (NCT04730440)

EYE-TAR(MA)-Follow-Up aims to evaluate the long-term impacts of the Training of Affect Recognition TAR (an emotion recognition rehabilitation program), on social cognition abilities, evolve gaze strategies, behavioral disorders, and the caregiver's burden in Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Subjects who completed EYE-TAR(MA) study, and who have signed informed consent for this follow-up, will be eligible to enroll. They will attend one visit two years post EYE-TAR(MA) study intervention (intervention was TAR, or a "classic" cognitive stimulation program) to undergo the following evaluation: Eye-tracking recording during Ekman Faces task, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Zarit scale (completed by caregiver).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

It is commonly admitted that social cognition impairment, like deficit in facial emotion recognition or misinterpretation of others' intentions (Theory of Mind), are associated with social behavior disorders.

This kind of disorders are observed in Fronto-Temporal Dementia (FTD), Alzheimer's Dementia (AD) and Parkinson's Disease (PD), with severe deficits in FTD and lighter deficits in AD and PD. One explanation is that patients apply inappropriate visual exploration strategies to decode emotions and intentions of others.

The study EYE-TAR(MA), NCT04730440, aimed to evaluate impacts of an emotion recognition rehabilitation program, named Training of Affect Recognition (TAR), on social cognition abilities (facial emotion recognition and theory of mind) in AD. In addition, investigators hypothesized that the effect of this rehabilitation will also evolve gaze strategies, behavioral disorders, and the caregiver's burden.

EYE-TAR(MA) results showed that participants who participated to the TAR (a) recognized facial emotions better and faster, especially sadness, fear and neutral expression; (b) evolved their gaze strategies on emotional faces with increased observation of the upper part of the face (nose and / or eyes); (c) had reduced behavioral disorders and the caregiver's burden. These results were specific to the TAR, since no significant change was observed in the AD-Control group who had participated in a "classic" cognitive stimulation program.

These changes were generally maintained one month after treatment.

Because there is not long-term follow-up data for these patients, Sponsor and investigators set-up the EYE-TAR(MA)-Follow-Up study to evaluate the long-term impacts of the Training of Affect Recognition, on social cognition abilities, evolve gaze strategies, behavioral disorders, and the caregiver's burden.

Subjects who completed EYE-TAR(MA) study, and who have signed informed consent for this follow-up, will be eligible to enroll. They will attend a visit two years post EYE-TAR(MA) study intervention to undergo the following evaluation: Eye-tracking recording during Ekman Faces task, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Zarit scale (completed by caregiver).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Monaco, Monaco, 98000
        • Centre Mémoire / Centre de Gérontologie Clinique Rainier III / Princess Grace Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

AD patients, who completed EYE-TAR(MA) study, and who have signed informed consent for this 2 years follow-up.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who were included in the EYE-TAR (MA) study, and who completed this study.
  • Subject accompanied by the caregiver already present during participation in the EYE-TAR (MA) study.
  • Written informed consent signed by patient and family caregiver.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
AD-TAR
AD subjects who took part to Facial Emotion Recognition rehabilitation (TAR) during EYE-TAR(MA) study
Long term follow-up for patient who completed the EYE-TAR(MA) study.
AD-Cognitive Stim
AD subjects who took part to cognitive stimulation session (12 sessions during 4 weeks) during EYE-TAR(MA) study
Long term follow-up for patient who completed the EYE-TAR(MA) study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Facial emotion recognition (FER) performances
Time Frame: 2 years follow-up

Change from EYE-TAR(MA) Last evaluation and Comparison of FER performance between Long-term follow-up AD-TAR group and Long-term follow-up AD-Cognitive Stimulation group.

Evaluation criteria: Scores to Ekman Faces task (1976) and time to answer. FER was assessed using pictures from the Ekman Faces task (1976), to test the recognition of the six facial basic emotions and neutral faces. There were four pictures per emotion, for a total of 28. For each picture, participants were asked to select one of the seven labels (anger, disgust, fear, sadness, happiness, surprise and neutral), with a maximum of 8 seconds of response time per picture.

2 years follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eye gaze strategies during Facial emotion recognition (FER)
Time Frame: 2 years follow-up

Change from EYE-TAR(MA) Last evaluation and Comparison of gaze patterns between Long-term follow-up AD-TAR group and Long-term follow-up AD-Cognitive Stimulation group.

Evaluation criteria: Eye movements (number and duration of fixations on areas of interest) recorded with an eye-tracking device. FER was assessed using some pictures from the Ekman Faces task (1976).

2 years follow-up
Behavioral disorders
Time Frame: 2 years follow-up

Change from EYE-TAR(MA) Last evaluation and Comparison between Long-term follow-up AD-TAR group and Long-term follow-up AD-Cognitive Stimulation group.

Evaluation criteria: Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), a scale that includes ten behavioral items (delusions, hallucinations, agitation, depression, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability and aberrant motor behaviors) and two neurovegetative symptoms (sleep and appetite disorders). The evaluation was based on an interview with patients' primary caregivers. Both the frequency (/5) and the severity (/3) of each behavior were determined and a score was calculated by multiplying the frequency and the severity of each behavior observed during the last month.

2 years follow-up
The Family caregiver's burden
Time Frame: 2 years follow-up

Change from EYE-TAR(MA) Last evaluation and Comparison between Long-term follow-up AD-TAR group and Long-term follow-up AD-Cognitive Stimulation group.

Evaluation criteria: The burden of the family caregiver was measured with the Zarit scale (completed by the caregiver). Composed of 22 questions on the physical, emotional and financial load felt. Total score /88.

2 years follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sandrine LOUCHART DE LA CHAPELLE, MD-PHD, Centre Mémoire, Centre de Gérontologie Clinique RAINIER III, Princess Grace Hospital, Monaco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Family Caregivers

Clinical Trials on Long term follow-up

3
Subscribe