Dutch Multidomain Lifestyle Intervention in Older Adults at Risk of Cognitive Decline (FINGER-NL)

January 10, 2024 updated by: Marissa Zwan, Alzheimercentrum Amsterdam
FINGER-NL is a multi-center, randomized, controlled, multidomain lifestyle intervention trial among 1,206 older adults at risk for cognitive decline with a duration of 24 months. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a personalized multi-domain lifestyle intervention (high-intensity intervention group) versus online access to general lifestyle-related health information (low-intensity intervention group).

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1210

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Alzheimer Center Amsterdam
      • Groningen, Netherlands
        • University Medical Center Groningen
      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • Maastricht University
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Radboud University
      • Wageningen, Netherlands
        • Wageningen Unversity and Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 60-79 years of age at pre-screening;
  • Adequate fluency in Dutch to understand the informed consent and complete questionnaires;
  • Providing informed consent to all study procedures;
  • Internet access at home;
  • Presence of ≥3 self-reported risk factors for cognitive decline (must contain at least 2 modifiable risk factors and 1 non-modifiable riskfactor).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of dementia or mild cognitive impairment at baseline (self-reported);
  • Significant cognitive impairment assessed using the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status battery (TICSm score<23);
  • Conditions affecting safe and continuous engagement in the intervention (e.g. under treatment for current malignant diseases, major psychiatric disorders (e.g. major depression, psychosis, bipolar disorder), neurological disorders (e.g. Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis), symptomatic cardiovascular disease (e.g. stroke, angina pectoris, heart failure, myocardial infarction), re-vascularization within three months, severe loss of vision, hearing or communicative ability, severe mobility impairment, other conditions preventing co-operation) as judged by the local study nurse or consulted physician at the local study site;
  • Coincident participation in any other intervention trial at time of pre-screening.
  • Coincident participation of spouse in FINGER-NL trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: high-intensity group
The high intensity group receives a personalized, supervised intervention consisting of group meetings and individual sessions.
A multidomain lifestyle intervention, including (1) physical activity, (2) cognitive training, (3) cardiovascular risk factor management (Cardiovascular), (4) dietary counselling, (5) Souvenaid, (6) sleep counselling, (7) stress management, and (8) social activities.
No Intervention: low-intensity group
The low-intensity arm receives online access to general lifestyle-related health information.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2-year change from baseline in global cognitive composite score
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Global cognitive composite score derived from subtest scores from the Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB) that includes 15-Word Verbal Learning Test delayed recall (discrete number; 0-15 (higher score means a better outcome)), Digit Symbol Substitution Test 90 seconds (discrete number; 0-90 (higher score means a better outcome)), WAIS digit span backwards (discrete number; 0-14 (higher score means a better outcome)), and semantic fluency (discrete number; 0-no maximum, higher score means a better outcome)).
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
15-Word Verbal Learning Test delayed recall
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
discrete number; score: 0-15 (higher score means a better outcome)
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Digit Symbol Substitution Test 90 seconds
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
discrete number; 0-90 (higher score means a better outcome)
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) digit span backwards
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
discrete number; 0-14 (higher score means a better outcome)
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Semantic fluency
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
word count in one minute; minimum 0, no maximum, higher score means a better outcome.
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Instrumental activities of daily living using the Amsterdam Instrumental Activity of Daily Living Questionnaire (A-IADL-Q)
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Total scores range approximately 20-70, higher scores indicate better IADL functioning
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
5 level EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Quality of life, score 0-100, higher scores indicate better quality of life
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
LIfestyle for BRAin health (LIBRA)
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Modifiable dementia risk using lifestyle for brain health; The score ranges from -5.9 (minimum score) to +12.7 (maximum score), with higher scores meaning a worse outcome (higher dementia risk)
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
grip strength test
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Scores between 0 to 90 kg can be measured on the Jamar Hand dynamometer, with higher scores indicating better grip strength
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
SQUASH questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
METs derived from the Ainsworth's compendium of physical activity will be used to classify physical activity intensity (<1.5METs- sedentary, 1.6-2.9 METs- light, 3.0-5.9METs- moderate, >6.0- vigorous physical activity).
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
LASA Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Average hours and minutes of sedentary behavior a day, range from 0 to 24 hours. Higher scores (more hours) means a more sedentary behavior.
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Total physical and mental fatigability scores range from 0-50, with higher scores indicating higher fatigability.
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
SARC-F Sarcopenia Questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
sarcopenia, scores range from 0 to 10 (i.e. 0-2 points for each component; 0 = best to 10 = worst).
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire - Short Form (FFMQ-SF)
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Total scale ranges from 24 - 120, higher scores indicate more mindfulness
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Total score, scale 0 - 40, higher scores indicate more perceived stress
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
MetaMemory in Adulthood (MIA)
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Sum of Part 1 + Part 2A and B. Part 1: Strategy (scores 10 - 50, higher scores indicate more use of strategies), Part 2A: Subjective memory functioning, scores ranges from 23 - 115, with higher scores indicate better memory self-efficacy and 2B: Locus, scores ranges from 7 - 35, higher scores indicate better perceived personal control over remembering abilities.
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Blood pressure
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
scores range from approximately (for diastolic) 60-120 and (for systolic) 100-180 mmHg, with higher scores indicating higher blood pressure.
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Cholesterol
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
total (healthy level: 125 to 200mg/dL), HDL (healthy level = 40mg/dL or higher), LDL (healthy level = Less than 100mg/dL) + triglycerides (healthy level = less than 150-199 mg/dL)
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Blood glucose
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
HbA1C, scores range from approximately 30-100 mmol/mol, with higher scores indicate higher blood glucose levels.
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Waist circumference
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
measured in cm
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Hip circumference
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
measured in cm
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Height
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
measured in cm
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Weight
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
measured in kg
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
scores range from 9-26, with lower scores indicating better medication adherence
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
MIND-adjusted Eetscore-FFQ
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Dutch Healthy Diet Index 2015 score (range 0-160 points, higher scores mean better outcome) and MIND score (range 0-15 points, higher scores mean better outcome), assessed by a short Food Frequency Questionnaire.
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Nutritional intake
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Change in nutritional intake measured by an online 3-day food diary (assessed by Traqq application), qualitative assessment
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Total score ranging from 0 to 21 with the higher total score (referred to as global score) indicating worse sleep quality
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Insomnia severity index
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
The score ranges from 0 (minimum score) to 28 (maximum score), with lower scores indicating a better outcome
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Lubben Social Network Scale
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
The score ranges from 0 (minimum score) to 30 (maximum score), with higher scores meaning a better outcome (higher level of perceived social support)
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
De Jong Gierveldt Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
The score ranges from 0 (minimum score) to 6 (maximum score), with higher scores representing a worse outcome (higher loneliness scores)
2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
Aβ42/40 ratio
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
amyloid-β (1-42)/(1-40) (pg/mL)
2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
p-tau
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
phosphorylated tau (pg/mL)
2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
NfL
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
neurofilament light chain (pg/mL)
2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
GFAP
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
glial fibrillary acidic protein (pg/mL)
2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
BDNF
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
brain-derived neurotrophic factor (pg/mL)
2 years (measured at baseline and follow-up 2)
Actigraph (Groningen site only)
Time Frame: 2 year (measured for 1 week at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
physical activity, sedentary behavior and sleep-wake activity
2 year (measured for 1 week at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
Physical Activity Record questionnaire (Groningen site only)
Time Frame: 2 year (measured for 1 week at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
physical activity, sedentary behavior and sleep-wake activity
2 year (measured for 1 week at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MOCA
Time Frame: baseline
Montreal Cognitive Assessment, minimum score 0, maximum score 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance
baseline
Motivation to Change Lifestyle and Health Behavior for Dementia Risk Reduction scale
Time Frame: 2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)
scores range from 27-135, with higher scores indicating greater motivation to change
2 years (measured at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wiesje M van der Flier, Prof, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam
  • Principal Investigator: Sebastian Köhler, Ass Prof, Maastricht University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021.0220
  • NL77242.029.21 (Other Identifier: Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (CCMO))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Decline

Clinical Trials on Multidomain lifestyle intervention

3
Subscribe