- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05257941
ESP Block VS Intrathecal Opioid After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
March 17, 2024 updated by: Amy McCutchan, Indiana University
Randomized Prospective Study Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intrathecal Opioid for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in an Enhanced Recovery Setting
This study is being done to compare 2 types of pain control methods and determine which is more effective postoperatively for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Group 1 will receive an intrathecal (IT) injection in the back in which a small dose duramorph and bupivacaine will be placed into the spinal fluid.
Group 2 will receive an erector spinae plane (ESP) block in which bupivacaine and decadron are injected near the nerves under a muscle in the back.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
126
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Amy McCutchan, MD
- Phone Number: (317) 274-0275
- Email: almccutc@iupui.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Lyla Farlow, LPN
- Phone Number: 317-948-9804
- Email: lychrist@iupui.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Recruiting
- IU Health University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Amy McCutchan, MD
- Phone Number: 317-274-0275
- Email: almccutc@iupui.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing an elective laparoscopic colorectal procedure at Indiana University Hospital or Methodist Hospital
- ASA Class 1, 2, 3 (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system)
- Age 18 to 80 years (male or female)
- BMI < 40kg/m2
- Desires regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control
Exclusion Criteria:
Any contraindication for neuraxial analgesia or ESP block procedure
- Contraindications for neuraxial analgesia include: Elevated intracranial pressure (except in cases of pseudo-tumor cerebri), infection at the site of injection, lack of consent from the patient, patient refusal, true allergy to any drug used in the spine, and uncorrected hypovolemia.
- Contraindications for ESP block procedure include: Infection at the site of injection, patient refusal, true allergy to any of the drugs used in the block, and lack of patient consent.
- Any patient undergoing a laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.
- Any physical, mental or medical conditions which, in the opinion of the investigators, may confound quantifying postoperative pain resulting from surgery.
- Known true allergy to the study medications (morphine, bupivacaine, decadron, Tylenol, Celebrex)
- Takes over 30 mg of oral morphine equivalents daily
- Any history of substance abuse in the past 6 months
- End stage liver disease, end stage renal disease
- Body weight of < 50 kg
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: IT Injection
an intrathecal (IT) injection in the back in which a small dose duramorph and bupivacaine will be placed into the spinal fluid
|
an intrathecal (IT) injection in the back in which a small dose duramorph and bupivacaine will be placed into the spinal fluid
|
Active Comparator: ESP Block
an erector spinae plane (ESP) block in which bupivacaine and decadron are injected near the nerves under a muscle in the back.
|
an erector spinae plane (ESP) block in which bupivacaine and decadron are injected near the nerves under a muscle in the back
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
cumulated oral morphine equivalent (OME)
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
morphine consumption
|
24 hours after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
opioid consumption
Time Frame: 1 hour after surgery
|
opioid consumption in OME
|
1 hour after surgery
|
opioid consumption
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
|
opioid consumption in OME
|
12 hours after surgery
|
opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
opioid consumption in OME
|
24 hours after surgery
|
opioid consumption
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
|
opioid consumption in OME
|
48 hours after surgery
|
opioid consumption
Time Frame: 72 hours after surgery
|
opioid consumption in OME
|
72 hours after surgery
|
Visual Analog Scale pain scores
Time Frame: 1 hour after surgery
|
pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain)
|
1 hour after surgery
|
Visual Analog Scale pain scores
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
|
pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain)
|
12 hours after surgery
|
Visual Analog Scale pain scores
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain)
|
24 hours after surgery
|
Visual Analog Scale pain scores
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
|
pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain)
|
48 hours after surgery
|
Visual Analog Scale pain scores
Time Frame: 72 hours after surgery
|
pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain)
|
72 hours after surgery
|
opioid side effects
Time Frame: duration of hospital stay up to 72 hours
|
incidence of opioid side effects (nausea, pruritus, urinary retention, respiratory depression, ileus)
|
duration of hospital stay up to 72 hours
|
first ambulation
Time Frame: duration of hospital stay up to 72 hours
|
time to patient first ambulation
|
duration of hospital stay up to 72 hours
|
first flatus
Time Frame: duration of hospital stay up to 72 hours
|
time to first flatus
|
duration of hospital stay up to 72 hours
|
oral liquid
Time Frame: duration of hospital stay up to 72 hours
|
time to first oral liquid intake
|
duration of hospital stay up to 72 hours
|
oral food
Time Frame: duration of hospital stay up to 72 hours
|
time to first oral food intake
|
duration of hospital stay up to 72 hours
|
hospital stay
Time Frame: duration of hospital stay up to 7 days
|
amount of time each subject spends in the hospital before discharge
|
duration of hospital stay up to 7 days
|
patient's satisfaction scores
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
assess patient's satisfaction with care (1-10 with 1 being the least satisfied and 10 being the most satisfied)
|
24 hours after surgery
|
patient's satisfaction scores
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
|
assess patient's satisfaction with care (1-10 with 1 being the least satisfied and 10 being the most satisfied)
|
48 hours after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amy McCutchan, MD, Indiana University School of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.
- Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
- Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA; Laparoscopy and/or Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) Study Group; Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2006 Jul;93(7):800-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5384.
- Rashid A, Gorissen KJ, Ris F, Gosselink MP, Shorthouse JR, Smith AD, Pandit JJ, Lindsey I, Crabtree NA. No benefit of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks over wound infiltration with local anaesthetic in elective laparoscopic colonic surgery: results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jul;19(7):681-689. doi: 10.1111/codi.13578.
- Chin KJ, Adhikary S, Sarwani N, Forero M. The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair. Anaesthesia. 2017 Apr;72(4):452-460. doi: 10.1111/anae.13814. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
- Chin KJ, Malhas L, Perlas A. The Erector Spinae Plane Block Provides Visceral Abdominal Analgesia in Bariatric Surgery: A Report of 3 Cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):372-376. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000581.
- Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, Rockall TA, Young-Fadok TM, Hill AG, Soop M, de Boer HD, Urman RD, Chang GJ, Fichera A, Kessler H, Grass F, Whang EE, Fawcett WJ, Carli F, Lobo DN, Rollins KE, Balfour A, Baldini G, Riedel B, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):659-695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y.
- Tulgar S, Kapakli MS, Senturk O, Selvi O, Serifsoy TE, Ozer Z. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Sep;49:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
- Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.
- Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
- Kwon HM, Kim DH, Jeong SM, Choi KT, Park S, Kwon HJ, Lee JH. Does Erector Spinae Plane Block Have a Visceral Analgesic Effect?: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sci Rep. 2020 May 21;10(1):8389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65172-0.
- De Cassai A, Bonvicini D, Correale C, Sandei L, Tulgar S, Tonetti T. Erector spinae plane block: a systematic qualitative review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Mar;85(3):308-319. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.13341-4. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
- Kendall MC, Alves L, Traill LL, De Oliveira GS. The effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postsurgical pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 1;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01016-8.
- Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett W, Fry C, Rockall TA. Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2011 Aug;98(8):1068-78. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7545. Epub 2011 May 17.
- Huang J, Liu JC. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Apr 14;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00999-8.
- Khoo CK, Vickery CJ, Forsyth N, Vinall NS, Eyre-Brook IA. A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg. 2007 Jun;245(6):867-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000259219.08209.36.
- Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PB, Hendry PO, Spies C, von Meyenfeldt MF, Fearon KC, Revhaug A, Norderval S, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Dejong CH; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009 Oct;144(10):961-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.170.
- Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):189-98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a.
- McEvoy MD, Scott MJ, Gordon DB, Grant SA, Thacker JKM, Wu CL, Gan TJ, Mythen MG, Shaw AD, Miller TE; Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) I Workgroup. American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on optimal analgesia within an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery: part 1-from the preoperative period to PACU. Perioper Med (Lond). 2017 Apr 13;6:8. doi: 10.1186/s13741-017-0064-5. eCollection 2017.
- Marret E, Remy C, Bonnet F; Postoperative Pain Forum Group. Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2007 Jun;94(6):665-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5825.
- Tulgar S, Ahiskalioglu A, De Cassai A, Gurkan Y. Efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane block in the management of pain: current insights. J Pain Res. 2019 Aug 27;12:2597-2613. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S182128. eCollection 2019.
- Miller TE, Thacker JK, White WD, Mantyh C, Migaly J, Jin J, Roche AM, Eisenstein EL, Edwards R, Anstrom KJ, Moon RE, Gan TJ; Enhanced Recovery Study Group. Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg. 2014 May;118(5):1052-61. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000206.
- Borzellino G, Francis NK, Chapuis O, Krastinova E, Dyevre V, Genna M. Role of Epidural Analgesia within an ERAS Program after Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Studies. Surg Res Pract. 2016;2016:7543684. doi: 10.1155/2016/7543684. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
- Liu H, Hu X, Duan X, Wu J. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) vs. patient controlled analgesia (PCA) in laparoscopic colectomy: a meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Jul-Aug;61(133):1213-9.
- Merchea A, Lovely JK, Jacob AK, Colibaseanu DT, Kelley SR, Mathis KL, Spears GM, Huebner M, Larson DW. Efficacy and Outcomes of Intrathecal Analgesia as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Colon and Rectal Surgical Patients. Surg Res Pract. 2018 Mar 1;2018:8174579. doi: 10.1155/2018/8174579. eCollection 2018.
- Koning MV, Klimek M, Rijs K, Stolker RJ, Heesen MA. Intrathecal hydrophilic opioids for abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and trial sequential analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Sep;125(3):358-372. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.061. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
- Day AR, Smith RV, Scott MJ, Fawcett WJ, Rockall TA. Randomized clinical trial investigating the stress response from two different methods of analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2015 Nov;102(12):1473-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9936. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
- Pedrazzani C, Menestrina N, Moro M, Brazzo G, Mantovani G, Polati E, Guglielmi A. Local wound infiltration plus transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local wound infiltration in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS program. Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):5117-5125. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4862-5. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
- Liu X, Song T, Chen X, Zhang J, Shan C, Chang L, Xu H. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 2;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00967-2.
- Dam M, Hansen C, Poulsen TD, Azawi NH, Laier GH, Wolmarans M, Chan V, Bendtsen TF, Borglum J. Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block reduces opioid consumption and prolongs time to first opioid demand after laparoscopic nephrectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jan;46(1):18-24. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101745. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
- López MB, Cadórniga ÁG, González JML, Suárez ED, Carballo CL, Sobrino FP. Erector spinae block. A narrative review. Cent Eur J Clin Res. 2018;1(1):28-39
- Hamed MA, Goda AS, Basiony MM, Fargaly OS, Abdelhady MA. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study original study. J Pain Res. 2019 Apr 30;12:1393-1398. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S196501. eCollection 2019.
- Oh TK, Yim J, Kim J, Eom W, Lee SA, Park SC, Oh JH, Park JW, Park B, Kim DH. Effects of preoperative ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block on pain after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):127-134. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4941-7. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
- Dewinter G, Coppens S, Van de Velde M, D'Hoore A, Wolthuis A, Cuypers E, Rex S. Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2018 Nov;268(5):769-775. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002888.
- Boulianne M, Paquet P, Veilleux R, Drolet S, Meunier A, Frigault J, Simonyan D, Turgeon AF. Effects of quadratus lumborum block regional anesthesia on postoperative pain after colorectal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4157-4165. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07184-0. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
- Koo CH, Hwang JY, Shin HJ, Ryu JH. The Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Terms of Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 10;9(9):2928. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092928.
- Aksu C, Kuş A, Yörükoğlu HU, Tor Kılıç C, Gürkan Y. The effect of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. JARSS 2019;27(1):9-14
- Schwartzmann A, Peng P, Maciel MA, Alcarraz P, Gonzalez X, Forero M. A magnetic resonance imaging study of local anesthetic spread in patients receiving an erector spinae plane block. Can J Anaesth. 2020 Aug;67(8):942-948. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01613-8. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
- Vidal E, Gimenez H, Forero M, Fajardo M. Erector spinae plane block: A cadaver study to determine its mechanism of action. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2018 Nov;65(9):514-519. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 27. English, Spanish.
- Kamel AAF, Amin OAI, Ibrahem MAM. Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. Pain Physician. 2020 Jul;23(4):375-382.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 27, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 7, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 22, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
February 25, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 19, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 17, 2024
Last Verified
March 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 12514
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgery
-
3MRecruitingAbdominal Surgery | Orthopedic Surgery | Vascular Surgery | Cardiovascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompletedHand Surgery | Wrist Surgery | Forearm Surgery | Elbow SurgeryUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedGynecological Surgery | Plastic Surgery | ENT SurgeryFrance
-
Edwards LifesciencesCompletedAbdominal Surgery | Pelvic Surgery | Non-Cardiac/ Non-Thoracic Surgery | Major Peripheral Vascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Maquet Cardiopulmonary GmbHNAMSARecruitingCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Thoracic Surgery | Vascular SurgerySpain
-
Baylor Research InstituteChiesi USA, Inc.RecruitingSurgery | Cardiac Surgery | Surgery--Complications | Percutaneous Coronary InterventionUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityEdwards LifesciencesCompletedCardiac Surgery | Thoracic Surgery | Heart Surgery | Heart Transplant
-
Surgify Medical OyCompletedSurgery | Spine SurgeryFinland
-
Cairo UniversityBatterjee Medical College; Taif UniversityCompletedSurgery | Bariatric SurgeryEgypt, Saudi Arabia
-
Poudre Valley Health SystemTerminatedSurgery | Surgery--ComplicationsUnited States
Clinical Trials on IT Injection
-
Benjamin Van Voorhees, MD, MPHNorthwestern University; NorthShore University HealthSystem; Advocate Health... and other collaboratorsCompletedMajor Depression | Depressive EpisodesUnited States
-
University of Texas at AustinBaylor College of Medicine; University of Kansas Medical CenterCompleted
-
Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs GlobalCompletedPeripheral Artery Disease | Critical Limb IschemiaAustria
-
Oslo University HospitalCentre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, UKEnrolling by invitationBurns | Cleft Lip and Palate | Craniofacial Abnormalities | Skin Condition | Other Conditions Leading to a Visible DifferenceNorway
-
University of AarhusUnknownDysfunction of Vestibular SystemDenmark
-
ShireCompleted
-
Integro TheranosticsRecruitingBreast Cancer | DCIS | Invasive Duct Carcinoma of BreastUnited States
-
ShireCompletedHunter SyndromeSpain, United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Australia, Mexico
-
University of AlbertaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Alberta Innovates Health Solutions and other collaboratorsCompletedPediatric ObesityCanada
-
Penn State UniversityCompletedSubstance Abuse ProblemUnited States