- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05292690
An Assistive Powered Wheelchair: Stage 2 Trial (EDUCAT)
An Assistive Powered Wheelchair: Stage 2 Trial - Powered Wheelchair User Evaluation of an Obstacle Alerting System. A Non-interventional Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Many powered wheelchair users find that collision free driving presents a significant challenge to confident and safe driving. In some cases so much so that the user will not drive their chair in some environments.
Interviews with users in the EDUCAT project confirmed that users had problems driving safely and confidently in a confined space, passing through doorways or down narrow corridors and when reversing.
Therefore the goal of this stage of the project is to improve the quality of life of the powered chair user by developing an obstacle alerting system which will help improve their confidence and safety in driving.
This was to be achieved by asking expert users to provide feedback on the impact and usefulness of providing information about the presence and location of obstacles in the vicinity of their powered wheelchair.
There are two aspects to this.
- User assessment of the usefulness of the obstacle alerting feedback. This will include user evaluation of the value of the different modes of feedback - audio, visual and haptic - and how best to adapt these to the range of driving environments and driving speeds. And what level of control the user requires to select and deselect these options.
- Monitoring the user's driving patterns with and without obstacle alerting -using the Stage 1 recording device.
The analysis of this data, and feedback from the Users and carers will inform the development and design of the obstacle alerting system.
Because of the COVID-19 pandemic the trial could not be carried out with powered wheel-chair users participating as they represented a clinically vulnerable part of the population. The trial was, therefore, adapted and carried out with adult non-wheelchair users.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Kent
-
Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom, CT1 3NG
- East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults who are not wheelchair users.
- Willing and able to provide a valid consent.
- Able to participate in interviews aided or unaided using preferred method of communication.
- Willing to drive a powered chair.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Lacks capacity to consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pre-trial Participant Evaluation of the possible Value of an Obstacle Alerting System
Time Frame: immediately before the intervention/procedure
|
The participant had been given an information sheet describing the Obstacle Alerting System. The participants were given the pre-trial questionnaire to obtain their opinion of the value of the Obstacle Alerting System. In a face to face interview the participants were asked to score each question. 0=don't know, 1=not at all, to 5=very helpful. Participants were also asked to discuss the reasons for their choices. Questions included. Value of warning of obstacles in the vicinity of the powered chair. Use of visual, auditory and haptic feedback in a range of environments e.g. small room, lifts, corridor, doorways, crowded spaces. The value of a reversing camera. Perceived benefit for Powered Chair Users. |
immediately before the intervention/procedure
|
Post-trial Participant Evaluation of the possible Value of the Obstacle Alerting System
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure
|
Post-trial questionnaire based on pre-trial questionnaire. Participants reassessed the Obstacle Alerting System [OAS] in the light of experience. In a face to face interview the participants were asked to score each question. 0=don't know, 1=not at all, to 5=very helpful. Participants were also asked to discuss the reasons for their choices. Asked when they found the OAS helpful and when unhelpful. Assessment of the feedback options and when they were and were not helpful. How could the OAS be improved to make it more user friendly and environment specific. Perceived benefit for Powered Chair Users. |
immediately after the intervention/procedure
|
Joystick range of movement patterns with and without the Obstacle alerting System Active
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure
|
Range of movement scatter plots/ heat maps
|
immediately after the intervention/procedure
|
Smoothness of joystick movement with and without the Obstacle alerting System Active
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure
|
Smoothness of movement e.g. Normalised Jerk Score. A lower score indicates smoother and more controlled movements. Typical values for this trial are in the range of 3000-5000. A lower score is an indication of the participant learning to drive and becoming more familiar with the course. A lower score may occur with the Obstacle Alerting system active - if it helps. A higher score if it distracts. At present this is a novel measure of these factors |
immediately after the intervention/procedure
|
Joystick path length with and without the Obstacle alerting System Active
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure
|
Joystick path length - distance the participant moves the joystick to drive the course. Calculated from the joystick displacement X and Y coordinates. For a set course it would be expected that the path length will decrease as the participant learns to drive and familiarises with the course. Fatigue not having an impact. A lower score may occur with the Obstacle Alerting system active - if it helps. A higher score if it distracts. At present this is a novel measure of these factors |
immediately after the intervention/procedure
|
Time to complete the course with and without the Obstacle alerting System Active
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention/procedure
|
Manually timed.
Start when participant enters the course, stop when exiting the course
|
immediately after the intervention/procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mohamed Sakel, MD, East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Metabolic Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS
- Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
- Demyelinating Diseases
- Autoimmune Diseases
- Lung Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Trauma, Nervous System
- Spinal Cord Diseases
- TDP-43 Proteinopathies
- Proteostasis Deficiencies
- Pancreatic Diseases
- Polyradiculoneuropathy
- Polyneuropathies
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Motor Neuron Disease
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- Cystic Fibrosis
- Craniocerebral Trauma
- Guillain-Barre Syndrome
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Purinergic Antagonists
- Purinergic Agents
- Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors
- Purinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists
- Central Nervous System Stimulants
- Caffeine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020/MEDPHYS/01
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, CryptogenicSingapore, Philippines
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of Alabama at BirminghamEnrolling by invitationStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Engagement, Patient | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaAmerican Occupational Therapy FoundationRecruitingStroke | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke IschemicUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Michael Smith Foundation for...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Chronic StrokeCanada
-
University of CincinnatiMedical University of South Carolina; University of California, Los Angeles; University...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
Turkish Stroke Research and Clinical Trials NetworkElectroCore INC; Turkish Neurological SocietyCompletedStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke, HemorrhagicTurkey
-
University of LiegeCompletedStroke, Acute | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, ComplicationBelgium
Clinical Trials on Powered Wheelchair Obstacle Alerting System
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruiting
-
UPnRIDE Robotics Ltd.Sheba Medical CenterUnknownSpinal Cord Injury CervicalIsrael
-
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education...Completed
-
Montana State UniversityThrasher Research FundCompletedCerebral Palsy, SpasticUnited States
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompleted
-
Brain SentinelActive, not recruiting
-
Grand Valley State UniversityNot yet recruitingCerebral PalsyUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedBlindness | Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
Brain SentinelNot yet recruiting
-
Brain SentinelNot yet recruiting