Comparison of Efficacy of ESWL and Laser Lithotripsy in Chronic Pancreatitis With ERCP

September 13, 2022 updated by: Zhaoshen Li, Changhai Hospital

ESWL Combined With ERCP and Laser Lithotripsy Combined With ERCP In Treatment of Pancreatic Duct Stones With Chronic Pancreatitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study will compare the efficacy of ESWL and Laser Lithotripsy in the treatment of pancreatic duct stones with ERCP.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is an inflammatory disease that can causes progressive fibrosis of pancreatic tissue and eventually leads to damage of pancreatic exocrine and endocrine. According to statistics, the prevalence of CP in China is 13/10 million, which is still increasing. Pancreatic duct stones are the most important pathological changes of CP. More than 50% of patients with CP are accompanied by pancreatic duct stones, which can lead to pancreatic duct obstruction, hypertension and tissue ischemia. Removal of pancreatic duct stones under Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are the first choice. ERCP is effective in the treatment of pancreatic duct stones by using basket and/or balloon catheter. But in most cases, ERCP is only suitable for the treatment of pancreatic duct stones (diameter < 5mm) located in the head/body of the Pancreatic Duct (PD). PD stones larger than 5mm generally require Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) or Endoscopic Intraductal Lithotripsy (EIL) for pretreatment. EIL includes Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy (EHL) and Laser Lithotripsy (LL).

ESWL first locates the stone by X-ray, and then uses an electromagnetic pulse generator to direct a higher-energy shock wave to the stone, so that the stone is crushed by thousands of shock waves. The principle of laser lithotripsy is to make the stone absorb strong infrared rays and generate shock waves to achieve the purpose of fragmenting the stone.

In view of the fact that there is no relevant research comparing the overall efficacy of ESWL combined with ERCP and EIL combined with ERCP, it is necessary to evaluate the differences in the therapeutic effects and complications of the two for PD stones. This research helps to provide evidence-based medical evidence, guide physicians' clinical practice, improve the quality of patients' lives, and reduce the economic burden of patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200433
        • Changhai Hospital
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yi-li Cai, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Teng Wang, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • symptomatic adult patients diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic duct stones;
  • at least one stone (>5 mm in diameter) located in the pancreatic duct of the head/body of the pancreas;
  • dilation of the proximal pancreatic duct.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of ERCP or ESWL treatment;
  • suspected to have malignant tumors;
  • history of pancreatic surgery or gastrojejunostomy (Billroth II);
  • pancreatic pseudocyst with a diameter >4cm;
  • bile duct stricture secondary to cholangitis or chronic pancreatitis;
  • acute pancreatitis exacerbation or acute exacerbation of chronic pancreatitis (including biliary pancreatitis);
  • coagulation dysfunction (INR≥1.5 or platelet count≤50×10^9/L);
  • pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  • patients who refused to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: ESWL and ERCP
The patients will receive intravenous analgesia (flurbiprofen and remifentanil) before the ESWL (Compact Delta II; Dornier Med Tech, Wessling, Germany). The time scale between the last ESWL session and following ERCP will be greater than 48h. ERCP will be performed under conscious sedation with intramuscular administration of diazepam 2.5-5.0 mg and pethidine 25-50 mg. If necessary, endoscopic sphincterotomy will be performed. A dilating bougie or balloon will be used to dilate the stenosis after sphincterotomy. Standard techniques (i.e., extraction basket, extraction balloon, or both) will be used for stone removal. A pancreatic duct stent or a nasopancreatic catheter will be inserted for temporary drainage if necessary.
First, ESWL will be used for lithotripsy, and then ERCP will be performed to clear the stones after lithotripsy.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: LL and ERCP
ERCP will be performed under conscious sedation with intramuscular administration of diazepam 2.5-5.0 mg and pethidine 25-50 mg. If necessary, endoscopic sphincterotomy will be performed. A dilating bougie or balloon will be used to dilate the stenosis after sphincterotomy. After that, laser lithotripsy will be performed. Standard techniques (i.e., extraction basket, extraction balloon, or both) will be used for stone removal. A pancreatic duct stent or a nasopancreatic catheter will be inserted for temporary drainage if necessary.
After establishing the working channel under ERCP, the stone will be crushed with a laser lithotripter, and then ERCP will clear the stones after lithotripsy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
technical success rates
Time Frame: during ERCP procedure
Technical success rates refer to the successful completion of standard procedures or the occurrence of complete spontaneous stone removal.
during ERCP procedure
clearance rates of pancreatic duct stones
Time Frame: during ERCP procedure
Clearance rates have been defined as complete, partial, or failure if the proportion of stones cleared was > 90%, 50% - 90%, or < 50%, respectively.
during ERCP procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time taken to completely clear the stone
Time Frame: during ESWL and ERCP procedure
The time taken to completely clear the stones.
during ESWL and ERCP procedure
postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP procedure
Major post-ERCP complications includes post-ERCP pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, and perforation, which are classified as mild, moderate, or severe, depending mainly on the length of hospitalization and the need for invasive treatment.
30 days after ERCP procedure
success rates of pancreatic duct decompression
Time Frame: during ERCP procedure
Successful removal of pancreatic duct obstruction factors by clearing stones and/or placing pancreatic duct stents/nasopancreatic catheters.
during ERCP procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
abdominal pain relief rate
Time Frame: 30 days after ERCP procedure
Postoperative and preoperative abdominal pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS can be calculated ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain).
30 days after ERCP procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatitis, Chronic

Clinical Trials on ESWL and ERCP

3
Subscribe