- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05360212
Anatomy-based Fitting in Cochear Implant Users
Anatomy-based Fitting in Unexperienced Cochlear Implant Users. Programación Basada en la anatomía en Usuarios Nuevos de Implante Coclear.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In this study, the performance with the CI is investigated over time in three groups of freshly implanted CI users. The first group is fitted using the standard frequency-band distribution as implemented in MAESTRO 9. In the second group of users, an anatomy-based frequency distribution is used as per anatomy-based fitting in MAESTRO 9. The performance with anatomy-based fitting is assessed by comparing performance with the CI in these two groups over time.
The third group constitutes the within-subject design. These subjects are both fitting using the standard frequency-band distribution and the anatomy-based frequency distribution in MAESTRO 9. So, subjects will have both study maps on their audio processor throughout the whole study. They will have to change weekly between both fittings: standard fitting and anatomy-based fitting. Here, the performance with anatomy-based fitting is assessed by comparing performance with standard fitting and anatomy-based fitting.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Luis Lassaletta, PhD
- Phone Number: 0034656898265
- Email: llasaletta@salud.madrid.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Miryam Calvino, PhD
- Phone Number: 0034646354267
- Email: miryamcf@yahoo.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28046
- Recruiting
- Hospital Universitario de La Paz
-
Contact:
- Miryam Calvino
- Email: miryamcf@yahoo.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Post-lingual onset of severe to profound sensory-neural hearing loss in the implanted ear(s)
- Post-OP CT scan of the CI electrode available
- Subject implanted with MED-EL cochlear implant(s)
- Subjects received a Flex28 or FlexSoft electrode
- Subject planned to receive a SONNET 2 /RONDO3 audio processor on the newly implanted side
- Audio processor not yet activated on the newly implanted side
- The most apical active electrode contact has to be inserted at least 450°
- Minimum of 10 active channels can be activated
- Fluent in Spanish
- Signed and dated ICF before the start of any study-specific procedure
Specific inclusion criteria for the possible study groups • Bilateral CI users: Bilateral CI implantation SONNET 2/RONDO3 audio processor on the first ear implanted
- 40% speech recognition a monosyllabic word Test in quiet at 65 dB SPL (last time tested) on the already implanted side
40% speech recognition in a sentence test in noise (10 dB SNR) on the already implanted side First activation of the already implanted side between 3 and 12 months prior to study inclusion
• Unilateral CI users: Unilateral CI implantation CI user with contralateral hearing ≥ 60 dB (PTA measured at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz)
• SSD CI users: Unilateral CI implantation CI user with contralateral hearing ≤30 dB (PTA measured at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) Interaural threshold gap ≥40 dB
• Bimodal CI users: Unilateral CI implantation Contralateral ear adequately fitted with a hearing aid CI user with contralateral hearing ≥30 dB (PTA measured at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) CI user with contralateral hearing ≤55 dB (PTA measured at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) Interaural threshold gap ≥15 dB
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of compliance with any inclusion criteria
- EAS user (user of an EAS audio processor)
- Implanted with C40+, C40X and C40C
- Implanted with an ABI or Split electrode array
- Known allergic reactions to components of the investigational medical device
- Anything that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would place the subject at increased risk or preclude the subject's full compliance with or completion of the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Standard fitting
The first group is fitted using the standard frequency-band distribution as implemented in MAESTRO 9
|
These group is fitted using the standard frequency-band distribution as implemented in MAESTRO 9.
|
Experimental: Anatomy-based fitting
In the second group of users, an anatomy-based frequency distribution is used as per anatomy-based fitting in MAESTRO 9
|
MAESTRO 9 can display the tonotopic frequency of each individual electrode channel imported from OTOPLAN to further support fitting based on these measures.
The audiologist can set a frequency-band distribution that is more closely aligned to the tonotopic frequency distribution as imported from OTOPLAN.
|
Experimental: Within-subject design: Standard fitting + ABF
The third group constitutes the within-subject design.
These subjects are both fitting using the standard frequency-band distribution and the anatomy-based frequency distribution in MAESTRO 9. So, subjects will have both study maps on their audio processor throughout the whole study.
They will have to change weekly between both fittings: standard fitting and anatomy-based fitting.
|
Patients of this group are both fitting using the standard frequency-band distribution and the anatomy-based frequency distribution in MAESTRO 9. So, subjects will have both study maps on their audio processor throughout the whole study.
They will have to change weekly between both fittings: standard fitting and anatomy-based fitting.
Here, the performance with anatomy-based fitting is assessed by comparing performance with standard fitting and anatomy-based fitting.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Result from the speech test in noise (S0N0)
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Speech perception evaluation with CI-only (MATRIX) with signal and noise in the same channel
|
Month 6
|
Results from speech tests in noise with spatially separated loudspeakers
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Speech perception evaluation with CI-only (MATRIX) with signal and noise in different channels
|
Month 6
|
Result from the speech test in quiet (S0)
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Speech perception evaluation with CI-only (disyllables)
|
Month 6
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Results of quality of sound
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Subjective results through Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index 19.
Scores range 19-133 points.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
Month 6
|
Results of quality of life in challenging situations
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Subjective results through Listening effort questionnaire.
Scores range 21-93 points.
Higher scores mean a better outcome.
|
Month 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Luis Lassaletta, PhD, Fundacion para la Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital Universitario la Paz
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- PI-6128
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Children's National Research InstituteRecruitingProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaActive, not recruitingImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)RecruitingHealth Related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
PharmanexSprim Advanced Life SciencesCompletedHealth-related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Linkoeping UniversityRecruiting
-
South Valley UniversityActive, not recruitingDeterminants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRSHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
Clinical Trials on Standard Fitting
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompleted
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselRecruitingCochlear Implants | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralBelgium
-
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbHRecruitingSensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralFrance
-
Yu-Hsiang WuVanderbilt University Medical Center; National Institute on Deafness and Other...RecruitingAlzheimer Disease 2 Due to Apoe4 Isoform | Presbycusis, BilateralUnited States
-
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbHCompletedSensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralFrance
-
Bernafon AGTerminatedHearing LossSwitzerland
-
Advanced BionicsCompletedEar Diseases | Hearing Loss | Hearing Disorders | Otolaryngological DiseaseUnited States
-
Yu-Hsiang WuVanderbilt University Medical Center; National Institute on Deafness and Other...Recruiting
-
Whisper.aiSan Jose State UniversityRecruitingHearing LossUnited States