- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05375669
The Effect of Increasing Current or Pulse Duration on Patient Movement and Intraoperative Transcranial Electric Stimulation Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude (CCCV)
Transcranial electric stimulation (TES) motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring is standard during surgery risking motor system injury. The stimuli are typically 5-pulse trains with a 4 ms interstimulus interval (ISI). The pulse duration (D) is often set to 50 or 500 µs. Both are effective, but setting D to the chronaxie would be physiologically optimal and limited data suggest that mean MEP chronaxie may be near 200 µs.
When necessary, one can obtain larger MEPs by increasing current (I) or D to increase stimulus charge (Q = I × D). However, this also increases patient movement that can interfere with surgery and reduce MEP acquisition frequency.
The main research question is whether increasing current or pulse duration when applying intraoperative neuromonitoring produces less patient movement during surgery. As such, the IOM ISIS System will be employed for neuromonitoring and an accelerometer will be used to quantify patient movement.
The constant-current TES stimulators will be used in this study with a high-precision oscilloscope. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), surgery and TES MEP monitoring will proceed routinely without modification and normally involves acquiring many MEPs over several hours. The only departure from standard care will be the placement of two small accelerometers and a brief MEP sequence before skin incision to determine chronaxie and compare the effect of an equivalent increase of I or D on MEP amplitude and movement.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Transcranial electric stimulation (TES) motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring is standard during surgery risking motor system injury. The stimuli are typically 5-pulse trains with a 4 ms interstimulus interval (ISI). The pulse duration (D) is often set to 50 or 500 µs. Both are effective, but setting D to the chronaxie would be physiologically optimal and limited data suggest that mean MEP chronaxie may be near 200 µs.
When necessary, one can obtain larger MEPs by increasing current (I) or D to increase stimulus charge (Q = I × D). However, this also increases patient movement that can interfere with surgery and reduce MEP acquisition frequency. Anecdotal observations suggest that increasing D may produce larger MEPs with less movement than increasing I, but there is no published support. If true, then the optimal D for monitoring may be above the chronaxie because less movement could facilitate more frequent MEP acquisition.
Finally, there is ongoing controversy about constant-current or constant-voltage TES. However, with stable resistance (R) there is no fundamental reason to prefer one or the other since they are related by Ohm's law I = V/R. Also, since threshold current and voltage vary with D their maximum levels should also vary with selected D, which could be confusing. Instead, because the International Electrotechnical Commission 50 mJ safety limit is based on energy (E = I2 × D × R = V2 × D/R), it may be more logical to apply constant-energy TES that would provide a consistent 0-50 mJ selection range at any selected D.
The primary objective is to assess whether intraoperative neuromonitoring with constant current or constant voltage produces less patient movement during surgery. The secondary objectives are to compare MEP amplitudes with the different setups, to estimate the true mean or median chronaxie and to develop the concept of constant-energy TES.
The main research question is whether increasing current or pulse duration when applying intraoperative neuromonitoring produces less patient movement during surgery. As such, the IOM ISIS System will be employed for neuromonitoring and an accelerometer will be used to quantify patient movement.
The constant-current TES stimulators will be used in this study with a high-precision oscilloscope. The calibration will assess 5-pulse trains with a 4 ms ISI and 100 mA output across a 1000 Ω resistor at 250, 500, and 1000 µs D. Measurements will include actual I and D of each pulse, and actual ISI.
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), surgery and TES MEP monitoring will proceed routinely without modification and normally involves acquiring many MEPs over several hours. The only departure from standard care will be the placement of two small accelerometers and a brief MEP sequence before skin incision to determine chronaxie and compare the effect of an equivalent increase of I or D on MEP amplitude and movement.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Kathleen Seidel, MD
- Phone Number: +41 31 6320014
- Email: kathleen.seidel@insel.ch
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jonathan Wermelinger, PhD
- Phone Number: +316328354
- Email: jonathan.wermelinger@insel.ch
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bern, Switzerland, 3010
- Recruiting
- Dep. of Neurosurgery, Bern University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Kathleen Seidel, MD
- Phone Number: +41316322409
- Email: kathleen.seidel@insel.ch
-
Contact:
- Jonathan Wermelinger, PhD
- Phone Number: +41316328354
- Email: jonathan.wermelinger@insel.ch
-
Principal Investigator:
- Kathleen Seidel, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Informed Consent signed by the subject
- The patient has a supra- or infra-tentorial lesion requiring surgery
- The patient is undergoing neurosurgery with the use of Intraoperative Monitoring (IOM) during surgery to protect functional tissue
- The patient is older than 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- No need for Intraoperative Monitoring (IOM)
- Vulnerable subjects (pregnant women, pregnant, impaired consciousness)
- People who do not want to participate in the study
- Emergency procedures in which no consent was obtained before the operation
- Multiple surgeries on the same patient
- Preoperative non-affected arm motor deficit (MRC <5), that is to say, no motor deficit of the arm ipsilateral to the surgery
- Inhalational anesthesia
- Persisting neuromuscular blockade
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: ISIS IOM System
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), surgery and TES MEP monitoring will proceed routinely without modification and normally involves acquiring many MEPs over several hours.
The only departure from standard care will be the placement of two small accelerometers and a brief MEP sequence before skin incision to determine chronaxie and compare the effect of an equivalent increase of I or D on MEP amplitude and movement.
|
The constant-current TES stimulators will be used in this study with a high-precision oscilloscope. The calibration will assess 5-pulse trains with a 4 ms ISI and 100 mA output across a 1000 Ω resistor at 250, 500, and 1000 µs D. Measurements will include actual I and D of each pulse, and actual ISI. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), surgery and TES MEP monitoring will proceed routinely without modification and normally involves acquiring many MEPs over several hours. The only departure from standard care will be the placement of two small accelerometers and a brief MEP sequence before skin incision to determine chronaxie and compare the effect of an equivalent increase of I or D on MEP amplitude and movement. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comparison of the effect of a 2-fold increase of I or of D from threshold on patient movement
Time Frame: During surgery, estimated on average to be about 4 hours
|
Comparison of the effect of a 2-fold increase of I or of D from threshold on patient movement quantified by accelerometers on the patient's forehead and contralateral (non-affected) shoulder.
|
During surgery, estimated on average to be about 4 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comparing the effect of a 2-fold increase of I or of D from threshold on MEP amplitude
Time Frame: During surgery, estimated on average to be about 4 hours
|
Compare the effect of a 2-fold increase of I or of D from threshold on MEP amplitude as measured by the ISIS IOM System
|
During surgery, estimated on average to be about 4 hours
|
Chronaxie
Time Frame: During surgery, estimated on average to be about 4 hours
|
The stimulation strength (in mA) necessary to elicit an MEP are measured with the different pulse durations (in μs)
|
During surgery, estimated on average to be about 4 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kathleen Seidel, MMD, Inselspital Bern, Department of Neurosurgery
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Szelenyi A, Kothbauer KF, Deletis V. Transcranial electric stimulation for intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: Stimulation parameters and electrode montages. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;118(7):1586-95. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 May 15.
- Abalkhail TM, MacDonald DB, AlThubaiti I, AlOtaibi FA, Stigsby B, Mokeem AA, AlHamoud IA, Hassounah MI, Baz SM, AlSemari A, AlDhalaan HM, Khan S. Intraoperative direct cortical stimulation motor evoked potentials: Stimulus parameter recommendations based on rheobase and chronaxie. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Nov;128(11):2300-2308. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
- Macdonald DB, Skinner S, Shils J, Yingling C; American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Dec;124(12):2291-316. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
- MacDonald DB. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Oct;19(5):416-29. doi: 10.1097/00004691-200210000-00005.
- Eng J. Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied? Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):309-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272012051.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- CCCV
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgery
-
3MRecruitingAbdominal Surgery | Orthopedic Surgery | Vascular Surgery | Cardiovascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompletedHand Surgery | Wrist Surgery | Forearm Surgery | Elbow SurgeryUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedGynecological Surgery | Plastic Surgery | ENT SurgeryFrance
-
Edwards LifesciencesCompletedAbdominal Surgery | Pelvic Surgery | Non-Cardiac/ Non-Thoracic Surgery | Major Peripheral Vascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Maquet Cardiopulmonary GmbHNAMSARecruitingCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Thoracic Surgery | Vascular SurgerySpain
-
Baylor Research InstituteChiesi USA, Inc.RecruitingSurgery | Cardiac Surgery | Surgery--Complications | Percutaneous Coronary InterventionUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityEdwards LifesciencesCompletedCardiac Surgery | Thoracic Surgery | Heart Surgery | Heart Transplant
-
Cairo UniversityBatterjee Medical College; Taif UniversityCompletedSurgery | Bariatric SurgeryEgypt, Saudi Arabia
-
Surgify Medical OyCompletedSurgery | Spine SurgeryFinland
-
Poudre Valley Health SystemTerminatedSurgery | Surgery--ComplicationsUnited States
Clinical Trials on ISIS IOM System
-
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research HospitalCompletedPelvic Pain | Nerve EntrapmentsTurkey
-
Helena PiccininiNova Scotia Health AuthorityWithdrawnGestational Weight GainCanada
-
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedHuntington's DiseaseCanada, United Kingdom, Germany
-
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedElevated Lipoprotein(a)Netherlands, United Kingdom, Denmark, Germany, Canada
-
BiogenCompleted
-
BiogenTerminatedSpinal Muscular AtrophyUnited States, Germany
-
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
BiogenCompletedSpinal Muscular AtrophyUnited States
-
BiogenCompletedSpinal Muscular AtrophyUnited States, Canada
-
BiogenCompletedSpinal Muscular AtrophyUnited States, Spain, Germany, United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, Canada, Belgium, France, Hong Kong, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Sweden, Turkey