Innovative Robotic Gait Trainer Use to Enable Walking in Children With Cerebral Palsy GMFCS III and IV

August 28, 2023 updated by: Anna McCormick, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Exploration to optimize mixed quantitative and qualitative methodology using multiple outcome measures in a randomized, cross-over trial structure comparing the effect of robotic gait training (RGT) group, and functional clinical therapy (FCT) using each subject as their own control.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Exploration to optimize mixed quantitative and qualitative methodology using multiple outcome measures in a randomized, cross-over trial structure comparing the effect of robotic gait training (RGT) group, and functional clinical therapy (FCT) using each subject as their own control.

The primary objective is to assess feasibility of the study design and device tolerability. Specifically:

  • Recruitment success (number screened, number eligible, number enrolled) where 80% of the recruitment target is reached.
  • Attrition rates of less than 10% (i.e. ≥90% of participant's successfully complete assessments).
  • Adherence for each participant: 80% of participants who complete assessments achieve the minimum target dose (i.e. approx. ≥30 hours of therapy in both study groups).
  • Qualitative feedback from clinicians and patients/caregivers on device tolerability and study participation.

Secondary objectives will evaluate the distance a child can walk in two minutes using the Two Minute Walk Test (2MWT, 18) and will examine a more global impact of the use of this technology. Data collected will include quality of gait, child or proxy chosen individualized goals, hypertonicity, contractures, and bone health.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anna M McCormick, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of cerebral palsy
  • GMFCS Levels III and IV
  • Ages ≥2 to ≤12 years
  • Ability to take steps with and/or without assistance
  • Meet the Trexo Plus device size requirements
  • Ability to follow instructions and signal pain, fear, or discomfort
  • Ability to safely use the device at home as determined by the study team

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lower limb or orthopedic surgery within 9 months prior to enrollment
  • Botulinum toxin injections within 4 months prior to enrollment
  • Serial casting within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Knee flexion contracture > 20°
  • Knee valgus > 40°
  • Hip subluxation > 40 % migration percentage
  • Uncontrolled movements that prevent transfer in and/or out of device
  • Weight bearing restrictions
  • Uncontrolled seizures
  • Skin lesions in areas where the device straps would be attached
  • Significant language barrier with parents and/or caregivers Note: children with severe contractures will be unable to fit in the device and are therefore excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Robotic Gait Training
8 weeks of therapy with the robotic gait training device 4-5 times a week for 1 hour each session
Use of a walker adapted with robotic components to promote proper walking gait
Experimental: Functional Clinical Therapy
8 weeks of therapy with a custom designed therapy program for the participant's needs 4-5 times a week for 1 hour each session
Personalized program of physical therapy targeted to improving walking gait

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enrollment and recruitment in this study design
Time Frame: 4 months
Recruitment success as defined by meeting 80% of the recruitment target
4 months
Retention in this study design
Time Frame: 4 months
Attrition of less than 10% where 90% of participants are completing the assessments to the end of the trial
4 months
Adherance to protocol for each participant
Time Frame: 4 months
Participant self-reported session diaries will be assessed to determine whether participants are achieving the min target dose of 30h of therapy over each 8 week session
4 months
Device tolerability
Time Frame: 4 months
Participant caregivers will be interviewed for qualitative feedback on device/therapy tolerability after each 8 week session
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2 minute walk test (2mwt)
Time Frame: 4 months
distance child is able to walk in their own walker in 2 minutes
4 months
Edinburgh Visual Gait Score
Time Frame: 4 months
Edinburgh Visual Gait Score is used for assessing gait quality by assessing body positions and angles of various body parts through the gait pattern using a scale of 0-2 for each individual component of the assessment. A score of 0 indicates a more physiologically normal result while a score of 2 indicates a more disordered result. The scores are totaled to provide the complete score for the patient on this assessment
4 months
Physiological Cost Index
Time Frame: 4 months
assessing gait efficiency by looking at the heart rate changes upon a specified exertional task. A lower physiological cost index indicates less exertion required to complete the task
4 months
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: 4 months
The Modified Ashworth Scale measures resistance during passive soft tissue stretching. It is ranked by body part on a scale of 0-4 with 0 being a normal tone and 4 being highly rigid in flexion or extension.
4 months
Hypertonia Assessment Tool
Time Frame: 4 months
Assessing dystonia, spasticity, and rigidity, or a mixed tone through a rating scale system where 0 indicates the behavior is not observed and 1 indicates the dystonic/spastic/rigid behavior is observed.
4 months
Barry Albright Dystonia Scale
Time Frame: 4 months
Assessing dystonia and severity of dystonia in eyes, mouth, neck, trunk, each upper extremity and each lower extremity. Scored from 0-4 where 0 is an absence of dystonia and 4 is a high degree of dystonia.
4 months
Goal attainment scale
Time Frame: 4 months
Attainment of self-determined goals for treatment outcomes. Goals are set with the study therapists at the outset of each treatment period and assessed using a scale of -2 to +2 where a score of 0 is the expected outcome, a negative score indicates less than expected and a positive number indicates more than expected
4 months
Spinal Alignment and Range of Motion Measure
Time Frame: 4 months
Range of motion throughout the body is measured from 0-4 where 0 is no limitation and 4 is a severe limitation.
4 months
Leg Bone cortical density
Time Frame: 4 months
peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) Measures Cortical density (mg/cm2)
4 months
Tibia volumetric bone mineral density (BMD)
Time Frame: 4 months
peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) Measures Tibia volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) (mg/cm2)
4 months
Leg bone cortical cross-sectional area
Time Frame: 4 months
peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) Measures cortical cross-sectional area (mm2)
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20200502

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no intention to share IPD with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Robotic Gait Training

3
Subscribe