The RAFT ECT Study (RAFT-ECT)

October 3, 2023 updated by: The George Institute

The Randomised Controlled Trial of Frontoparietal and Temporoparietal Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) for Severe Depression: The RAFT ECT Study

Severe depression is devastating for those affected and is often associated with significant risk of suicide. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective acute treatment for severe depression, but its use and acceptability are limited by cognitive side effects. Of these, retrograde memory loss is most concerning, and can be long-term. The introduction of ultrabrief right unilateral (UBRUL) ECT into clinical practice has been an important step in reducing the risk of memory impairment, but significant deficits still occur.

A new form of UBRUL ECT which utilises a Frontoparietal electrode placement represents a further development. Preliminary data suggest that Frontoparietal UBRUL has good efficacy and less cognitive side effects than UBRUL given using the conventional Temporoparietal electrode placement. Designed as a pivotal trial, this protocol will be the first RCT comparing these two forms of ECT, producing the rigorous efficacy and safety data required to change clinical practice/policy.

This is a multicentre, parallel group RCT with 1:1 allocation ratio between Frontoparietal (intervention) and Temporoparietal (comparator) forms of UBRUL ECT. Participation will involve receiving randomised acute ECT under blinded conditions during the randomised acute treatment period (typically around 4 weeks), then completion of a 24-week follow-up period which commences after the cessation of all acute ECT. The study protocol aims to provide 12 randomised acute ECT treatments, though the number of treatments (and hence the length of the randomised acute treatment period) can be adjusted by the participant's own treating/admitting psychiatrist according to their clinical judgement.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

154

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
    • Queensland
      • Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 4215
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Recruiting
        • Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University
        • Contact:
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of South Carolina
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-5 diagnosis* of major depressive episode (unipolar or bipolar)
  • HRSD-17 score ≥ 17 at Screening
  • At least 18 years old
  • Able to tolerate washout of prohibited medications and restriction on benzodiazepine dosage, as determined by patient's own treating psychiatrist.
  • ECT indicated for treatment of depression, as determined by own treating referring psychiatrist and confirmed by research evaluations (e.g., diagnosis of depression)
  • Willing and able to participate in research and comply with study requirements
  • Sufficient proficiency in spoken English to ensure validity of neuropsychological testing (e.g., worked or studied in an English-speaking context or equivalent)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, other [non-mood disorder] psychosis, or rapid cycling bipolar disorder (DSM-5 diagnoses*)
  • Current manic episode, hypomanic episode, or major depressive episode with mixed features (DSM-5 diagnoses*)
  • Alcohol or substance use disorder (other than caffeine or nicotine) present in the past month, or is likely to be present during the 24-week study period as determined by study physician evaluation
  • Diagnosis of amnestic disorder, dementia, delirium, or epilepsy, as determined by study physician evaluation and medical history
  • Central nervous system disease or brain injury that has resulted in significant cognitive impact, as determined by study physician evaluation and medical history
  • Serious or unstable medical condition, as determined by study physician evaluation and medical history
  • If female of childbearing potential: a) pregnancy as determined by pregnancy urine screen, and/or b) current breastfeeding
  • Completed an acute course of ECT during the past 2 months, as determined by treatment history
  • Received any ECT during the past 2 weeks
  • Failed an adequate course of ECT (i.e., 8 ECT treatments ) in the current depressive episode
  • Patients who are prisoners, and those who lack capacity to make medical decisions (as judged by their own treating psychiatrist)
  • Currently enrolled in another interventional clinical trial
  • Currently using another investigational device or product

    • DSM-5 psychiatric diagnoses will be assessed and confirmed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI; Sheehan et al., 1998) Version 7.0.2 for DSM-5, administered by research team members.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Frontoparietal ECT Group
Participants will receive ultrabrief right unilateral ECT with a frontoparietal placement of ECT electrodes.
UBRUL-FP involves ultrabrief right unilateral ECT delivered using a novel frontoparietal montage, where the anterior electrode is shifted frontally to a position above the midpoint of the right eye to avoid temporal lobe stimulation (and reduce memory side effects). UBRUL-FP will be delivered using standard ECT devices.
Active Comparator: Temporoparietal ECT Group
Participants will receive ultrabrief right unilateral ECT with the conventional temporoparietal placement of ECT electrodes.
UBRUL-TP is the standard form of ultrabrief right unilateral ECT, using the conventional temporoparietal (d'Elia) electrode placement, where the anterior electrode is placed over the right temporal lobe. UBRUL-TP will be delivered using standard ECT devices.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17
Time Frame: From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 has a range of 0-52. Lower scores represent mild depression to no depression at all.
From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17
Time Frame: From end of acute ECT treatment up to 24-week follow-up
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 has a range of 0-52. Lower scores represent mild depression to no depression at all.
From end of acute ECT treatment up to 24-week follow-up
Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF) Consistency Scores
Time Frame: From Baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
In the Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form, participants are graded on the consistency of their answers between baseline and subsequent time-points. The maximum consistency score is 100 percent, with lower percentages representing increasing inconsistency in retrospective autobiographical memory function.
From Baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S)
Time Frame: From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
The Clinical Global Impression-Severity measure is a 7-point scale where a clinician rates the severity of a patient's illness in comparison to the clinician's experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. The ratings range from 1 indicating normal, not at all ill to 7 suggesting they are among the most extremely ill patients.
From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Through the randomized acute ECT treatment period (typically 4 weeks)
The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement is a measure where a clinician assesses how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened in comparison to baseline. The "improved" version being used in this trial (Kadouri, Corruble & Falissard, 2007) is a 13-point scale with ratings which range from 6 ('ideal improvement') to -6 (maximum deterioration).
Through the randomized acute ECT treatment period (typically 4 weeks)
Suicidality score
Time Frame: From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Assessed by examining scores on item 3 (suicidality) of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (which range from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate more severe and/or persistent suicidality) and scores on the suicidal ideation subscale of the Columbia
From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Post ECT reorientation time
Time Frame: After ECT sessions 3 and 6, which typically occur at the end of week 1 and week 2 in the randomised acute treatment phase.
Post ECT reorientation time is the time taken to recover orientation immediately after ECT in randomised treatment phase.
After ECT sessions 3 and 6, which typically occur at the end of week 1 and week 2 in the randomised acute treatment phase.
Change in mean neuropsychological function
Time Frame: From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Assessed by a cognitive test battery.
From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Mental Health Questionnaire-14 (MHQ-14)
Time Frame: From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
The Mental Health Questionnaire-14 is a self-report quality of life instrument consisting of the mental health component of the Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire. This patient self-report measure contains 14 items in total, addressing symptoms of fatigue, anxiety and depression, and the impact of these symptoms on functioning. Scores on this measure range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better quality of life.
From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Number of responders
Time Frame: From baseline to End of Randomized Acute Treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Response is defined as a 50 percent reduction in depression severity from baseline, assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17
From baseline to End of Randomized Acute Treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Number of remitters
Time Frame: From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Remission is defined as a score of ≤ 7 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17.
From baseline to end of randomized acute treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Number of participants switched from randomized treatment to another form of acute ECT
Time Frame: After at least 8 randomized ECT treatments (typically after 3 weeks).
Number of participants switched from randomized treatment to another form of acute ECT after receiving at least 8 randomized ECT.
After at least 8 randomized ECT treatments (typically after 3 weeks).
Number of randomized ECT treatments given over the Acute Study Treatment Phase (RCT)
Time Frame: From baseline to End of Randomized Acute Treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Number of randomized acute ECT treatments received by participants during the Acute Study Treatment Phase (RCT), compared between the groups.
From baseline to End of Randomized Acute Treatment (typically 4 weeks)
Occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events
Time Frame: From baseline and up to 24-week follow-up
Occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) compared between the groups, based on treating them as binary outcomes (no/yes, e.g., whether participants experienced any given side effect/adverse event at least once) and as count outcomes (number of occurrences).
From baseline and up to 24-week follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Colleen Loo, University of New South Wales
  • Principal Investigator: Anthony Rodgers, The George Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Malcolm Hopwood, University of Melbourne
  • Principal Investigator: Alan Weis, Newcastle University
  • Principal Investigator: Shanthi Sarma, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Services
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Bull, Ramsay Clinic Lakeside, Warners Bay Private Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Vaughn McCall, Augusta University
  • Principal Investigator: Mark George, Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • X22-0018
  • APP1159769 (Other Grant/Funding Number: NHMRC)
  • RG180233 (Other Identifier: UNSW project number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data will be shared upon request to the data custodian, subject to approval from the Trial Steering Committee and signing of data transfer agreements.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Episode

Clinical Trials on Frontoparietal Ultrabrief Right Unilateral (UBRUL-FP) electroconvulsive therapy

3
Subscribe