- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05403944
Strength or Power Training for Patellofemoral Pain (STRIPE)
October 13, 2022 updated by: Neal Glaviano, University of Connecticut
Optimizing Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Using Strength Training Rehabilitation Incorporating Power Exercises
The objective of this study is to compare a novel 6-week strength training rehabilitation incorporating power exercises (STRIPE) program to a standard of care (SOC) program on short-term and long-term pain, subjective function, patellofemoral pain recurrence rates, and secondary outcomes (hip abduction and extension rate of torque development and single-leg squat kinematics).
We hypothesize that participants with patellofemoral pain who complete the STRIPE program will have 1) decreased pain, 2) improved subjective function, 3) reduced patellofemoral pain recurrence rates, 4a) improved hip abduction/extension rate of torque development, and 4b) decreased hip adduction and pelvic drop during a single leg squat compared to participants who complete a SOC rehabilitation program.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
The proposed study will compare strength-based exercises, which is the standard of care (SOC), that target the hip abductors, hip extensors, lumbo-pelvic, and quadriceps muscles, to a strength training program that utilized power-based exercises (Strength Training Rehabilitation Incorporating Power Exercises [STRIPE]).
Individuals with patellofemoral pain, both within the military and general population, present with long-term pain, decreased subjective function, and high recurrence rates.
Our primary outcomes are to determine intervention success with self-reported knee pain, measured by the visual analog scale, subjective function, measured by the anterior knee pain scale, and recurrence rates.
Recent evidence suggests that two in every three individuals with patellofemoral pain report symptoms up to two years after seeking care, therefore we will assess patellofemoral pain recurrence rates for two years.
Additionally, the proposed interventions target gluteal muscle function, supporting our selection of secondary outcome variables.
We will assess rate of torque development, as power-based exercises are recommended to improve muscle capacity, of both the targeted gluteus medius and gluteus maximus.
We will also assess frontal plane kinematics, as the gluteal muscles are responsible for controlling pelvic and hip motion during functional tasks.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
88
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Neal Glaviano, PhD
- Phone Number: 8604866712
- Email: neal.glaviano@uconn.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
Storrs, Connecticut, United States, 06269
- Recruiting
- University of Connecticut
-
Contact:
- Neal R Glaviano, PhD, ATC
- Phone Number: 860-486-6712
- Email: neal.glaviano@uconn.edu
-
-
Florida
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32816
- Recruiting
- University of Central Florida
-
Contact:
- L. Colby Mangum, PhD, ATC
- Phone Number: 407-823-2795
- Email: lauren.mangum@ucf.edu
-
-
Ohio
-
Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43606
- Recruiting
- University of Toledo
-
Contact:
- David M. Bazett-Jones, PhD, ATC
- Phone Number: 419-530-4241
- Email: david.bazettjones@utoledo.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants to be between the ages of 18-40 years old.
- Insidious onset of symptoms greater than 3 months.
- Worst pain in the previous month of 3/10 with two of the following tasks: prolonged sitting, jumping, squatting, kneeling, running, and stair ambulation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other forms of anterior knee pain (Osgood-Schlatter, tendon pain, bursitis, etc.).
- History of lower extremity surgery.
- History of patella subluxation, meniscal injury or ligamentous instability.
- History of referred pain from the lumbar spine.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Standard of Care (SOC)
The SOC rehabilitation group will complete three strength sessions a week.
All participants will be provided an educational pamphlet and exercises will be divided into four components - hip abductors, hip extensors, core, and quadriceps muscles.
The load magnitude for exercises will be between 60-70% of their 1 repetition max (1RM), with 3 sets of 12 repetitions and a 2-3-minute rest between sets.
Time under tension will be prescribed as slow to moderate, with a 2-second concentric phase and 2-second eccentric phase for each exercise.
Hip abductor, hip extensor, and core exercises will be initiated during week 1 and continued for the 6-week intervention, while quadriceps focused exercises will be introduced in weeks 3-6.
|
6 weeks of standard of care rehabilitation will be given designed to target the core, hip, and quadriceps muscles.
Each participant will be expected to complete 3 supervised telehealth sessions per week.
|
Experimental: Strength Training Rehabilitation Incorporating Power Exercises (STRIPE)
Those in the STRIPE group will complete two power and one strength training sessions a week.
All participants will be provided an educational pamphlet and exercises will be divided into four components - hip abductors, hip extensors, core, and quadriceps muscles.
The load magnitude will be greater than 60% of the 1RM, with the goal of continually loading against heavy resistance.
Participants will complete 4 sets of 6 repetitions, with 3-5 minutes of rest between sets.
Time under tension will be prescribed as <1 second for the concentric phase and 1 second for the eccentric phase of the exercise.
The strength training sessions will adhere to same parameters as the SOC.
Hip abductor, hip extensor, and core exercises will be initiated during week 1 and continued for the 6-week intervention, while quadriceps focused exercises will be introduced in weeks 3-6.
|
6 weeks of STRIPE rehabilitation will be given designed to target the core, hip, and quadriceps muscles.
Each participant will be expected to complete 3 supervised telehealth sessions per week.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in knee pain.
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Data are presented as knee pain, assessed on the visual analog scale in centimeters, resulting in a score of 0-10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 being worst pain imaginable.
Group means and standard deviations will be reported.
|
Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Change in self-reported knee function.
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Data are presented as self-reported knee function, assessed by the anterior knee pain scale. The scale ranged between 0-100, with 0 indicating complete disability and 100 indicating no disability. Group means and standard deviations will be reported. |
Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Patellofemoral pain recurrence
Time Frame: 6 months post intervention, 12-months post intervention, 18-months post intervention, and 24-months post intervention
|
The number of patients who report symptoms of patellofemoral pain
|
6 months post intervention, 12-months post intervention, 18-months post intervention, and 24-months post intervention
|
Change in hip rate of torque development
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
|
Hip abduction and extension rate of torque development will be assessed with a handheld dynamometer.
Data are reported as linear, with higher scores representing a faster ability to develop hip muscle force.
Group means and standard deviations will be reported.
|
Immediately after the intervention.
|
Change in hip adduction during a single leg squat
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Data are presented as a degree, with a higher number representing a higher amount of hip adduction.
Group means and standard deviations will be reported.
|
Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Change in pelvic drop during a single leg squat
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Data are presented as a degree, with a higher number representing a higher amount of pelvic drop.
Group means and standard deviations will be reported.
|
Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in psychological factors
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Psychological factors will be measures with the PROMIS-10, a 10-item general self-reported questionnaire that assess general domains related to physical, mental, and social health, in addition to perceived quality of life.
PROMIS-10 scores are standardized to the general population using a "T-Score", which is a score of 50 points and a standard deviation of 10-points.
Higher scores on the PROMIS-10 indicate a healthier patient.
Group means and standard deviations will be reported.
|
Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Change in cognitive factors
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Cognitive factors will be assessed with the Fear-Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ), a dimension specific questionnaire.
The FABQ contains two subscales - physical activity section that includes six-items, while the work section includes ten-items.
The physical activity subscale score range between 0-24 and the work subscale is scored between 0-42.
Higher scores identifying greater fear avoidance beliefs for both physical activity and work subscales.
Group means and standard deviations will be reported.
|
Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Change in coping strategy
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Coping strategies will be assessed with the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), a dimension specific questionnaire.
The PSEQ is a ten-item, dimension specific questionnaire that assesses how confident participants are with performing activities while experiencing pain.
Each item is rated on a scale ranging from 0 ("not at all confident") to 6 ("completely confident").
The PSEQ score ranges between 0-60, with a higher score representing higher confidence to function with pain.
Group means and standard deviations will be reported.
|
Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Change in physical activity
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Physical activity will be quantified with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF), a dimension specific questionnaire.
The IPAQ-SF is a 4-item short form that measures physical activity from the previous 7-days.
Questions include the number of days per week the participant engaged in vigorous activities, moderate activities, walking, and sitting, with a follow-up question for each asking for duration of time for each task.
Group means and standard deviations will be reported.
|
Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Change in self-reported knee function
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS) and the PFP subscale (KOOS-PF) will provide region and disease specific data throughout the study.
The KOOS measures five separate dimensions; pain, symptoms, activities of daily living function, sports and recreational function, and quality of life.
Each of the five domains are scored on a scale between 0-100, with lower scores representing greater impairments in self-reported function.
The KOOS-PF subscale is an 11-item region specific questionnaire, ranging from 0-100, with greater scores also reflecting greater function.
|
Immediately after the intervention and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-intervention.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Neal Glaviano, PhD, University of Connecticut
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 13, 2022
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
September 1, 2024
Study Completion (Anticipated)
September 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 31, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
June 3, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 14, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 13, 2022
Last Verified
October 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HR22-0038
- OR210126 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of Defense)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
IPD Plan Description
IPD data will be available on request after manuscript has been published.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patellofemoral Pain
-
Laval UniversityCompletedPatellofemoral Pain (PFPS)Canada
-
Lauren EricksonAmerican College of Sports MedicineCompleted
-
University of MelbourneNational Health and Medical Research Council, AustraliaCompletedKnee Pain | Patellofemoral PainAustralia
-
Universidade Federal do CearáNot yet recruitingPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeBrazil
-
University of Central LancashireCompletedPatellofemoral PainUnited Kingdom
-
Universidade Federal do CearáCompletedPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeBrazil
-
European University CyprusCompleted
-
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteUnknown
-
Aalborg UniversityCompletedPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeDenmark
-
University of VirginiaAccelerated Care Plus; Mid-Atlantic Athletic Trainers' AssociationCompletedPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeUnited States
Clinical Trials on Standard of Care Rehabilitation (SOC)
-
Matthew HochUniversity of Virginia; Naval Health Research Center; Marine Corps Base Camp...RecruitingAnkle Injuries | Ankle SprainsUnited States
-
Greek Aerospace Medical Association and Space ResearchActive, not recruitingStroke | Multiple Sclerosis | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive | AgedGreece
-
Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SAIncozen Therapeutics Pvt LtdCompleted
-
TakedaCompletedGaucher DiseaseUnited States
-
South African National Blood ServiceUnknownTherapeutic Use of Convalescent Plasma in the Treatment of Patients With Moderate to Severe COVID-19COVID-19 | SARS-CoV-2 Infection | Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2South Africa
-
HeNan Sincere Biotech Co., LtdUnknown
-
SeaStar MedicalWithdrawnCOVID-19 | Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy | Pulmonary Edema
-
Michelle LopezCompleted
-
AKARI TherapeuticsCompletedParoxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH)Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Sri Lanka
-
George Washington UniversityMedtronicCompleted