A Phase 3 Study to Compare Biosimilar Denosumab With Prolia®

July 30, 2022 updated by: Enzene Biosciences Ltd.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active-controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Enzene Denosumab (ENZ215) and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

This is a phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active-controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Enzene Denosumab (ENZ215) and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

504

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Uherské Hradiště, Czechia
        • Recruiting
        • Medical Plus S.R.O.
        • Contact:
          • Eva Dokoupilova

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Willing to provide voluntary written informed consent and able to comply with the protocol requirements
  2. Postmenopausal women aged ≥ 55 and ≤ 85 years
  3. Body weight ≥ 50 kg and ≤ 90 kg
  4. Diagnosed with osteoporosis, with absolute BMD at the lumbar spine (L1-L4 region) as measured by dual-energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) at screening
  5. At least 5 years of postmenopausal status confirmed by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels at screening
  6. At least one hip joint and two vertebrae in L1-L4 region evaluable by DXA
  7. No other clinically significant medical history, vital signs, physical examination, laboratory profiles as deemed by the Investigator or designee

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known hypersensitivity to denosumab or any of the excipients of the study drug
  2. Known intolerance to, or malabsorption of calcium or vitamin D supplements
  3. Previous exposure to Prolia® or any other denosumab biosimilar
  4. Previous use of oral bisphosphonates
  5. Use of intravenous bisphosphonates within the past 5 years prior to screening
  6. Use of parathyroid hormone or its derivatives, systemic hormone replacement therapy, selective estrogen-receptor modulators, or tibolone or calcitonin within 12 months prior to enrollment
  7. Any prior use of fluoride or strontium
  8. Systemic glucocorticoids (≥ 5 mg prednisone equivalent per day or cumulative dose ≥ 50 mg) for more than 10 days within 3 months prior to enrollment (topical and inhaled corticosteroids are allowed)
  9. Other bone active drugs (i.e. drugs affecting bone metabolism) including heparin, anti-epileptics (except for benzodiazepines and pregabalin), systemic ketoconazole, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), lithium, protease inhibitors, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, or anabolic steroids within the past 3 months prior to screening
  10. Known sensitivity to drug products derived from mammalian cell lines
  11. History of one severe or more than two moderate vertebral fractures per Genant classification as determined by the central reading center
  12. History of hip fracture or bilateral hip replacement
  13. Total hip or femoral neck T-score <-4.0
  14. History and/or presence of atypical femoral fracture
  15. Presence of any active healing fracture according to the Investigator's assessment
  16. History of any transplant or chronic immunosuppression (including patients on immunosuppressive therapy)
  17. Severe liver dysfunction
  18. Positive testing for hepatitis B (hepatitis B virus surface antigen [HbsAg]) or hepatitis C (hepatitis C virus antibody [HCV Ab]) virology
  19. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive serology for HIV at screening
  20. Significantly impaired renal function or receiving dialysis
  21. Oral or dental conditions
  22. Major surgery within 8 weeks prior to screening or anticipated major surgery during the study
  23. Clinically significant leukopenia, neutropenia, or anemia as determined by the Investigator or any other clinically significant medical condition or laboratory abnormality that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would pose a risk to patient safety or interfere with adherence to study procedures, study completion, or the interpretation of study results
  24. Patient with an active infection or history of infection
  25. Suspected signs and symptoms of COVID-19/confirmed COVID-19 or with recent history of travel/contact (less than 2 weeks from screening) with any COVID-19 positive patient/isolation/quarantine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: ENZ215
ENZ215 Injection:- 60 mg Denosumab (ENZ215) will be administered subcutaneously on day 1.
Enrolled women with postmenopausal osteoporosis will receive ENZ215 (60mg)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Prolia
Prolia Injection:- 60 mg Denosumab (Prolia) will be administered subcutaneously on day 1.
Enrolled women with postmenopausal osteoporosis will receive Prolia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the efficacy of ENZ215 when compared to Prolia in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, in terms of change in bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine
Time Frame: 360 days
Percentage change in BMD at lumbar spine (L1-L4 region) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
360 days
To compare the area under the effect curve (AUEC) of serum C-telopeptide of Type-1 collagen (sCTX) levels
Time Frame: 180 days
AUEC of sCTX over the initial 6 months (from Day 1 pre-dose to Month 6 pre-dose) will be assessed.
180 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the immunogenicity potential of ENZ215 and Prolia
Time Frame: 540 days
ADAs incidence at baseline and different timepoints from 1 month to 12 months and during open-label switch over period will be assessed.
540 days
To compare the safety and tolerability of ENZ215 and Prolia
Time Frame: 540 days
Treatment-emergent serious and non-serious adverse events (TEAEs) during main treatment period and open-label switch-over period will be assessed
540 days
To compare the pharmacokinetics of ENZ215 and Prolia
Time Frame: 360 days
Cmax of denosumab measured at predefined timepoints.
360 days
To compare the pharmacokinetics of ENZ215 and Prolia
Time Frame: 360 days
Tmax of denosumab measured at predefined timepoints.
360 days
To compare the pharmacokinetics of ENZ215 and Prolia
Time Frame: 360 days
partial AUC of denosumab measured at predefined timepoints.
360 days
To compare the change in serum procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (sP1NP) levels
Time Frame: 180 days
180 days
To compare the change in BMD at the lumbar spine
Time Frame: 180 days
Percentage change in BMD at lumbar spine measured by DXA from baseline to predefined timepoint
180 days
To compare the change in BMD at total hip and femoral neck
Time Frame: 360 days
Percentage change in BMD at total hip and femoral neck measured by DXA from baseline to Month to predefined timepoint
360 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 4, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on ENZ215

3
Subscribe