- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05426785
To Evaluate the Delivery Timing Safety and Efficacy of AntiTachycardia Pacing (BIO|ATP) (BIO|ATP)
A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study to Evaluate the Delivery Timing Safety and Efficacy of AntiTachycardia Pacing
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The enrolled patients are randomized to Treatment Group with setting to provide Antitachycardiac Pacing (ATP) multiple times at an early timing or Control Group with Long Detection setting for the conventional ATP, at latest 10 days after the implantation of the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator(ICD) system in the domestic centers to confirm the safety and efficacy of the setting for the early timing multiple ATP treatment in Japanese patients.
The follow-up is not pre-defined and the data (including the home monitoring data) is collected according to the site's standard outpatient schedule, but the data will be collected at the hospital visit for the initial appropriate or inappropriate shock therapy.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Yumiko Okaniwa
- Phone Number: +81-80-3608-6761
- Email: yumiko.okaniwa@biotronik.com
Study Locations
-
-
Fukuoka
-
Kitakyushu-city, Fukuoka, Japan, 8028555
- Recruiting
- Kokura Memorial Hospital
-
Contact:
- Kenji Ando
- Phone Number: +81-93-511-2000
- Email: ando_clinical-study@outlook.jp
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient has an indication for ICD according to the The Japanese Circulation Society (JCS )/ Japanese Heart Rhythm Society (JHRS) 2021 Guideline Focused Update on Non-Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias
- Patient is either planned for de novo ICD implantation or is already implanted with an investigational ICD for 10 days or less.
- Patient can be treated with ATP therapy for both VT and VF zone
- Patient is willing and able to use the CardioMessenger and accepts the Home Monitoring concept
- Patient is willing to visit the hospital in accordance with physician's instruction
- Patient is able to understand the nature of the study and to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient planned for implantation with or already implanted with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) device
- A patient who is confirmed to have received ICD therapy
- A patient who is diagnosed as Idiopathic VF (e.g. Brugada syndrome, Long QT Syndrome, other IVF)
- Age < 18 years
- A patient who has impaired mental status
- Life expectancy less than 18 months
- Participation in another interventional clinical investigation
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Treatment Group(Early Multiple ATP Group)
Set to perform multiple ATP early
|
Randomization also will be performed at latest 10 days after ICD implantation, and the specified device programming settings for the allocated group will be set after successful implantation of the investigational devices.
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
Set the extended detection time for the conventional ATP (Refer to the settings of "Delayed Therapy-arm C" in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial - Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT) study)
|
Randomization also will be performed at latest 10 days after ICD implantation, and the specified device programming settings for the allocated group will be set after successful implantation of the investigational devices.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time to first shock by Kaplan-Meier approach
Time Frame: From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months
|
During the study duration(42 months: the enrollment period is 24 months plus the follow up period is 18 months from the Last Patient In(LPI)), to confirm that Treatment Group is the non-inferiority to the Control Group in terms of the time from randomized prescriptive settings to first shock with ICD device treatment, by Kaplan-Meier approach.
The time frame of event evaluation is from a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months, since the study duration for each subject will differ according to the timing of enrollment.
|
From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Success rate of the ATP
Time Frame: From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months
|
During the study duration (42 months: the enrollment period is 24 months plus the follow up period is 18 months from the Last Patient In(LPI)), calculate the percentage of successful ATP treatment for all collected ATP treatment episodes.
The definition of ATP success is that confirming by one beat of sinus rhythm or Atrial Pacing (in case of Atrial fibrillation, the electrical complex on an Electrocardiogram (ECG) related to the depolarization of the ventricles (QRS) or Ventricular Pacing) under the tachycardia detection rate.
The time frame of event collections is from a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months, since the study duration for each subject will differ according to the timing of enrollment.
|
From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months
|
Duration until the end of the episode
Time Frame: From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months
|
For all episodes collected during the study duration (42 months: the enrollment period is 24 months plus the follow up period is 18 months from the Last Patient In(LPI)), the time from the onset to the termination of the episode recorded in the ICD device is measured as the episode duration.
The time frame of event collections is from a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months, since the study duration for each subject will differ according to the timing of enrollment.
|
From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months
|
Cardiac mortality
Time Frame: From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months
|
During the study duration (42 months: the enrollment period is 24 months plus the follow up period is 18 months from the Last Patient In(LPI)), confirm the occurrence of cardiac mortality in all enrolled patients.The time frame of evaluation of cardiac mortality is from a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months, since the study duration for each subject will differ according to the timing of enrollment.
|
From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dr. Kenji Ando, Kokura Memorial Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sterns LD, Meine M, Kurita T, Meijer A, Auricchio A, Ando K, Leng CT, Okumura K, Sapp JL, Brown ML, Lexcen DR, Gerritse B, Schloss EJ. Extended detection time to reduce shocks is safe in secondary prevention patients: The secondary prevention substudy of PainFree SST. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jul;13(7):1489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
- Schuger C, Daubert JP, Zareba W, Rosero S, Yong P, McNitt S, Kutyifa V. Reassessing the role of antitachycardia pacing in fast ventricular arrhythmias in primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: Results from MADIT-RIT. Heart Rhythm. 2021 Mar;18(3):399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.11.019. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
- Arenal A, Proclemer A, Kloppe A, Lunati M, Martinez Ferrer JB, Hersi A, Gulaj M, Wijffels MC, Santi E, Manotta L, Mangoni L, Gasparini M. Different impact of long-detection interval and anti-tachycardia pacing in reducing unnecessary shocks: data from the ADVANCE III trial. Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1719-1725. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw032. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
- Joung B, Lexcen DR, Ching CK, Silver MT, Piccini JP, Sterns LD, Rabinovich R, Pickett RA, Liu S, Brown ML, Cheng A. Additional antitachycardia pacing programming strategies further reduce unnecessary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jan;17(1):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.027. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
- Yokoshiki H, Shimizu A, Mitsuhashi T, Ishibashi K, Kabutoya T, Yoshiga Y, Kohno R, Abe H, Nogami A; Members of the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Committee of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. Trends in the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy device in advancing age: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database. J Arrhythm. 2020 Jun 8;36(4):737-745. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12377. eCollection 2020 Aug.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- TA119
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator(ICD)
-
Englewood Hospital and Medical CenterMedtronicCompletedUtility of the Audible Alert in Current Generation Medtronic Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillatorsPatients With a Generation 2 Medtronic Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator(ICD)United States
-
University of WashingtonCompletedImplantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)United States
-
Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (Inserm U970)Hôpital Necker-Enfants MaladesCompletedImplantable Defibrillator User | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Complications
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompletedPacemaker | Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillatorFrance
-
San Filippo Neri General HospitalBiotronik ItaliaCompletedPacemaker | Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorItaly
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedThe Patient Meets ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT-D) DeviceUnited Kingdom, Germany
-
University Hospital of PatrasCompletedPacemaker | Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillatorGreece
-
Yale UniversityCompletedImplantable Cardioverter Defibrillator | Cardiac PatientsUnited States
-
Cliniche Humanitas GavazzeniCompletedCardiac Pacemaker, Artificial | Implantable Cardioverter-DefibrillatorItaly
-
Biotronik, Inc.CompletedImplantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator With Magnetic Resonance ImagingUnited States
Clinical Trials on 1:1 ratio for Treatment Group and Control Group
-
Tasly Pharmaceutical Group Co., LtdCompleted
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedUterine Myoma | Ovarian Cyst | Laparoscopic Gynecologic SurgeryKorea, Republic of
-
Mihaela VisoiuCompletedPain, PostoperativeUnited States
-
University of Erlangen-NürnbergFa. Reck MOTOmedCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Oslo University HospitalNorwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in PhysiotherapyCompletedHealth-Related Quality of LifeNorway
-
Nantes University HospitalFondation ApicilTerminated
-
Texas A&M UniversityTufts University; Cornell UniversityActive, not recruitingHeart DiseasesUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompleted