- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05427149
The Effect of Intrathecal Magnesium Sulfate on Shivering
The Effect of Different Doses of Intrathecal Magnesium Sulfate on Shivering After Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Sections
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Perioperative shivering during cesarean section (CS) under neuraxial anesthesia (NA) is clinically common, but its treatment is often neglected.
When the literature is scanned, perioperative tremors are seen in 55%-60% of patients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia. However, the mechanism of the tremor has not been fully elucidated. Possible factors that can cause tremor can be listed as follows:
- Loss of thermoregulatory vasoconstriction below the block level,
- The displacement of body temperature from the central to the periphery due to vasodilation,
- Increased sweating threshold and decreased peripheral vasoconstriction Perioperative shivering is a complication that needs to be treated because it causes dangerous consequences in patients with low cardiopulmonary reserve due to increased oxygen consumption and impairs patient and surgeon comfort.
Magnesium sulfate is one of the most effective adjuvant drugs with the least side-effect profile in the treatment of tremor after noxial block.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Van, Turkey, 65080
- Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Dursun Odabaş Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Who were scheduled for elective C/S under SA,
- 18-40 years of age
- ASA physical status I-II.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any contraindications to SA,
- preoperative body temperature >38 C,
- allergy to any drug used in the study,
- pre-eclampsia, and eclampsia,
- neuropathy,
- respiratory distress,
- coagulopathy, and
- any possible drugs that can change body temperature,
- ASA physical status > II.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Group C
Patients receiving intrathecal 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (Marcaine® Spinal Heavy %0.5, Sanofi, Kırklareli, Turkey) + 1 mL normal saline (Polifleks %0.9 İzotonik Sodyum Klorür, Polifarma, Ankara, Turkey)
|
It will be evaluated whether there is postpinal shivering in the cases.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Group M25
Patients receiving intrathecal 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (Marcaine® Spinal Heavy %0.5, Sanofi, Kırklareli, Turkey) + 25 mg MgSO4 (Magnezyum Sulfat %15, Biofarma, Istanbul, Turkey).
MgSO4 diluted to 25mg/mL with normal saline (Polifleks %0.9 İzotonik Sodyum Klorür, Polifarma, Ankara, Turkey).
|
It will be evaluated whether there is postpinal shivering in the cases.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Group M50
Patients receiving intrathecal 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (Marcaine® Spinal Heavy %0.5, Sanofi, Kırklareli, Turkey) + 50 mg/mL MgSO4 (Magnezyum Sulfat %15, Biofarma, Istanbul, Turkey).
MgSO4 diluted to 50mg/mL with normal saline (Polifleks %0.9 İzotonik Sodyum Klorür, Polifarma, Ankara, Turkey).
|
It will be evaluated whether there is postpinal shivering in the cases.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Group M100
Patients receiving intrathecal 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (Marcaine® Spinal Heavy %0.5, Sanofi, Kırklareli, Turkey) + 100 mg MgSO4 (Magnezyum Sulfat %15, Biofarma, Istanbul, Turkey).
MgSO4 diluted to 100mg/mL with normal saline (Polifleks %0.9 İzotonik Sodyum Klorür, Polifarma, Ankara, Turkey)
|
It will be evaluated whether there is postpinal shivering in the cases.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Level of shivering
Time Frame: 3 mounths
|
Intraoperative and postoperative shivering will be evaluated with the shivering test established by Crossley and Mahajan. flicker tracking; The parameters looked at in this test approved by Crossley and Mahajan are: 0 = no flicker,
|
3 mounths
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: NUREDDİN YUZKAT, Assoc. prof, Van Yuzuncu Yil University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ameta N, Jacob M, Hasnain S, Ramesh G. Comparison of prophylactic use of ketamine, tramadol, and dexmedetomidine for prevention of shivering after spinal anesthesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul-Sep;34(3):352-356. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_211_16.
- Hoshijima H, Takeuchi R, Kuratani N, Nishizawa S, Denawa Y, Shiga T, Nagasaka H. Incidence of postoperative shivering comparing remifentanil with other opioids: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Aug;32:300-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.08.017. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
- Jayaraj A, Balachander H, Kuppusamy SK, Arusamy S, Rai Y, Siddiqui N. Comparison of meperidine, tramadol and fentanyl for post-spinal shivering prevention during cesarean delivery: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Nov;45(11):2202-2208. doi: 10.1111/jog.14106. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Anticonvulsants
- Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents
- Reproductive Control Agents
- Calcium Channel Blockers
- Tocolytic Agents
- Magnesium Sulfate
Other Study ID Numbers
- Intrathecal magnesium sulfate
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section Complications
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section Niche
-
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research...CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Ataturk UniversityUnknownCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; Complications, Wound, Dehiscence | Cesarean Section, Repeated | Cesarean, Uterine Scar Thickness | Cesarean, Residual Myometrial ThicknessTurkey
-
University of CalgaryNot yet recruitingCesarean Section ComplicationsCanada
-
Peking University People's HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Aswan University HospitalCompletedCesarean Section ComplicationsEgypt
-
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education HospitalUnknownCesarean Section ComplicationsTurkey
-
Ain Shams UniversityUnknownCesarean Section ComplicationsEgypt
-
Mohamed Abdelrady MohamedCompletedCesarean Section ComplicationsEgypt
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...Thammasat UniversityUnknownCesarean Section ComplicationsCanada