Activated CHARcoal in Poisoned Patient - Pilot Trial (CHARPP-Pilot)

January 27, 2026 updated by: Maude St-Onge, Laval University

CHARPP (Activated CHARcoal in Poisoned Patient): RCT Pilot Study

The goal of this clinical pilot trial is to determine the feasibility of the clinical trial. Then the large-scale CHARPP will be conducted in order to determine the efficacity of activated charcoal as a treatment for acute poisoning in a diverse population of both adults and children suspected of ingesting toxic substances that activated charcoal can adsorb. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can activated charcoal administered within a specific time frame prevent the progression of toxicity?
  • How does activated charcoal affect the length of stay in the hospital and the intensive care unit? Researchers will compare the intervention arm (receiving activated charcoal) to the control arm (receiving standard supportive care) to see if activated charcoal reduces hospital stay duration, ICU stay and improves overall patient outcomes.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to either receive activated charcoal or standard supportive care.
  • Undergo assessments using standardized clinical scales such as the Poison Severity Score and, for children, the PELODS score.
  • Have their functional outcomes evaluated, such as the ability to return to their original residence without help and manage personal hygiene tasks independently.

This structured approach will help clarify the role of activated charcoal in clinical toxicology and inform future treatment protocols.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Activated charcoal (AC) is one of the interventions more frequently recommended by poison centers. For instance, in 2020, 32,646 poisoned patients were treated with AC in the United States. This decontamination method has the potential to prevent toxicity and to decrease its severity, but its use is also associated with adverse effects and has a poor palatability. Therefore, we developed a research program named CHARPP (activated CHARcoal in Poisoned Patients) aiming to describe the effect and potential risks associated with the use of AC. This study is particularly focused on whether early administration of activated charcoal can reduce the severity of poisoning outcomes, shorten hospital stays, and mitigate healthcare costs.The first phase of our research program included: a retrospective study and a validation of the Poison Severity Score. The last phase includes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) preceded by a feasibility study in adults and children to compare outcomes in patients who received AC vs those who did not.

OBJECTIVES: This concerns the CHARPP RCT feasibility study which aims to evaluate the possibility of conducting a large multicenter RCT comparing outcomes between poisoned patients who received AC and who did not received AC. The targeted primary outcomes includes: 1) recruitment success (100 patients total at the poison centre associated with hospitals and greater than one patient enrolled/hospital/month), 2) protocol adherence (at least 85% of the patient randomized in the intervention group received AC in less than two hours after group allocation if AC was recommended or did not received it if it was not recommended) and, 3) Less than 5% loss to follow-up. As for the large-scale clinical trial if pilot trial shows feasability, the primary outcome will be progression of toxicity as measured using the Poison Severity Score, a patient-oriented metric frequently used in toxicology; mortality, length of stay in both the intensive care unit and hospital, quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L, and changes in the SOFA score for adults and the PELODS score for children.

METHODS: This randomized concealed multicenter trial will take place in one poison centre and five academic hospitals within the provincial network of the centre antipoison du Québec. Patients presenting to the Emergency rooms with a proven or suspected ingestion of a substance absorbed by activated charcoal and the ones who can receive the intervention within 6 hours of proven or suspected intoxication will be included. Patients requiring or who will likely require another gastro-intestinal decontamination method, who have a contraindication to receive AC, or who ingested a substance with an entero-hepatic circulation requiring multi-dose AC will be excluded. Once the poison centre has identified an eligible patient, we will use a web-based system to perform a randomization in random blocks of two or four. Co-interventions will be standardized as per the poison centre protocols. Follow up will be done every 8h by the poison centres who will also collect data regarding progression of toxicity and relevant outcomes. The research assistant who will extract data will be blinded to study allocation. Only a descriptive analysis will be done for the pilot trial. Data from paediatric patients will be analysed separately. A data and safety monitoring board independent from the study group will follow the results and approve or not the continuation of the study.

RELEVANCE: This will be an excellent opportunity to develop collaborations between poison centers and key actors who will be involved in a larger trial. The results of the research program CHARPP have the potential to influence policies, poison centers recommendations, clinicians' practices and to improve poisoned patients' outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 125 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult and pediatric patients who presented to the hospital less than 6h after the ingestion of a potentially toxic dose of a carbo-adsorbable substance (substance adsorbed by activated charcoal ).
  • Patients who can receive the intervention within 6 hours of proven or suspected intoxication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring or who will likely require another gastro-intestinal decontamination method;
  • Patients who have contraindication to the use of activated charcoal;
  • Patients who ingested a substance with an entero-hepatic circulation requiring multi-dose AC;
  • Patients who have no clinical equipoise for the use of activated charcoal as per the attending physician.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AC administration
Participants will receive 1g/kg up to a maximum of 50g of activated charcoal by mouth or by naso-gastric tube. The intervention is giving over 15 minutes, as recommended. Activated charcoal can be mixed in a black soft drink to improve palatability and treatment adherence which is often done in usual practice.
Activated charcoal
Other Names:
  • AC
Active Comparator: No AC
Participants will not receive any activated charcoal
No activated charcoal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment success
Time Frame: 12 months
100 patients total at the poison centre associated with hospitals and greater than one patient enrolled/hospital/month
12 months
Protocol adherence
Time Frame: 12 months
at least 85% of the patient randomized in the intervention group
12 months
lost to follow-up
Time Frame: 12 months
less than 5%
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression of toxicity (descriptive measure of delta Poison Severity Score - PSS max - PSS at randomization calculated at the end of each case)
Time Frame: 3 months
measured by the delta Poison Severity Score (min = 0 - better outcome; max = 4 - worse outcome) (and the SOFA - sequential organ failure assessment - score for adults or PELOD -paediatric logistic organ dysfunction - score for children) and available drug levels
3 months
Mortality
Time Frame: 3 months
Will be documented by both the poison centre and the hospitals. Will be collected in by the research coordinator
3 months
Length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital
Time Frame: 3 months
Will be documented by both the poison centre and the hospitals. Will be collected in by the research coordinator
3 months
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 3 months
Will be documented by both the poison centre and the hospitals. Will be collected in by the research coordinator
3 months
functional outcomes (descriptive measure: "back to baseline" or "not back to baseline" calculated at the moment of medical discharge, death or decision of withdrawal of life support)
Time Frame: 6 months
The ability of patients to return to their daily lives and activities after treatment. Specifically, the trial looks at whether patients can return to their original residence without help and manage personal hygiene tasks such as toileting independently. Will be documented by both the poison centre and the hospitals. Will be collected in by the research coordinator
6 months
adverse events
Time Frame: 3 months
Will be documented by both the poison centre and the hospitals. Will be collected in by the research coordinator
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maude St-Onge, MD PhD FRCPC, CHU de Québec - Université Laval

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Informed Consent Form (ICF) Clinical Study Report (CSR) Analytic Code

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Feb 2025 up to 6months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Any scientists

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Charcoal, Decontamination, Poisoning

Clinical Trials on Activated Charcoal

Subscribe