Technology Assisted Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Intervention for Anxiety in People Living With Cognitive Impairment (Tech-CBT)

January 21, 2024 updated by: The University of Queensland

Technology Assisted and Remotely Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Intervention for Anxiety in People Living With Cognitive Impairment: Randomised Controlled Trial

This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a remotely-delivered, technology-assisted psychotherapy program, supported by an innovative software platform for people with cognitive impairment experiencing anxiety.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Despite harmful health and economic consequences, anxiety is a vexing issue in persons with cognitive impairment with inadequate treatment options. What is needed currently is a digital technology option for treating anxiety in persons with cognitive impairment that can be rigorously evaluated and implemented. The objective of the study is to test the efficacy of a newly modified psychotherapy package (Tech-CBT), which incorporates Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) methods, assisted with technology and telehealth for persons with cognitive impairment experiencing anxiety. This project will also investigate the cost-effectiveness, usability and acceptability of Tech-CBT to enhance delivery of anxiety treatment for people with cognitive impairment. A process evaluation will inform its implementation in the community and memory clinics, and will recommend a strategic translational roadmap to enhance delivery of anxiety treatment in health services with a broad reach.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Tiffany Au, BBiomedSc
  • Phone Number: +61733465577
  • Email: t.au@uq.edu.au

Study Locations

    • Queensland
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4072
        • Recruiting
        • The University of Queensland
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Tiffany Au, BBiomedSc
          • Phone Number: +617 33465577
          • Email: t.au@uq.edu.au
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nadeeka Dissanayaka
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Deborah Brooks
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Leander Mitchell
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Nancy Pachana
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Peter Worthy
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Syed Keramat
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sally Bennett
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tracy Comans
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mark Chatfield
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jacki Liddle
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Anthony Angwin
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kimberley Welsh
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Teagan King
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4000
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Queensland University of Technology
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4029
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Surgical, Treatment and Rehabilitation Services (STARS), Metro North Hospital and Health Services
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kanaganayagam Appadurai
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4102
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Princess Alexandra Hospital (PAH), Metro South Hospital and Health Services
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Annette Broome
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Joanne Oram
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alexander Lehn
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4029
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH), Metro North Hospital and Health Services
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gerard Byrne
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • John O'Sullivan
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Robert Adam
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Rodney Marsh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Persons aged 18 years or over
  • Persons with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia of any aetiology based on a previous diagnosis by a clinician or scoring above threshold (≤32; MCI ≤32 and dementia ≤27) for cognitive impairment in the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Impairment (TICS-M).
  • Persons who reports subjective complaints of anxiety and/or screens positive for anxiety on either or all of the following measures: Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) and Rating Anxiety in Dementia Scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons with severe dementia
  • Persons unable to communicate or complete questionnaires
  • Persons who have a current risk of suicide within the last month as determined by the study clinical expert team.
  • Persons with major depression as the primary complaint without reported symptoms of anxiety
  • Persons with comorbid psychiatric conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tech-CBT intervention
Participants allocated to the Tech-CBT intervention group will attend six telehealth videoconferencing sessions - 1 session per week over 6 weeks. Each session will last between 60 to 90 minutes and will be facilitated by a trained therapist. During each session, the participant will learn and practice different psychotherapy techniques. The participant will be encouraged to practice these skills between sessions with the technology provided, either on their own or with the help of their support person.
The Tech-CBT intervention is a manualised package that incorporates Cognitive Behavioural Therapy methods.
No Intervention: Control
Participants allocated to the Control group will receive usual care (i.e., no treatment for anxiety) and a mid-point check-in phone call/video call/email (depending on their preference) from the study team approximately 3 weeks after completing the initial questionnaires. This mid-point check-in is to identify whether there have been any changes to their usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in anxiety
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 54 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in anxiety as measured by the Rating Anxiety in Dementia Scale (RAID).
Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 54 (lower score indicates better outcomes).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 52 (higher score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in quality of life as measured by the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD)
Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 52 (higher score indicates better outcomes).
Change in anxiety
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 20 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in anxiety as measured by the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI)
Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 20 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change in worry
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 8 to 40 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in worry as measured by the abbreviated version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ-A).
Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 8 to 40 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change in stress
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 56 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in stress as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14).
Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 56 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change in depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 15 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in depressive symptoms as measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).
Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 15 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change in carer burden
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 88 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in carer burden as measured by the Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI).
Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 88 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change in carer quality of life
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 20 to 99 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in carer quality of life as measured by the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL).
Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 20 to 99 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change in carer depression and anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary). Score ranging between 0 to 126 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in carer depression and anxiety symptoms as measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21).
Post assessment - week 8 (primary). Score ranging between 0 to 126 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
For people living with Parkinson's Disease, a change in Parkinsonism symptomology
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 3500 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in Parkinsonism symptomology as measured by the Patient Reported Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease (PRO-PD).
Post assessment - week 8 (primary), 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. Score ranging between 0 to 3500 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
For people living with Parkinson's Disease, a change in anxiety
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary). Score ranging between 0 to 40 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in anxiety as measured by the Parkinson's disease Specific Anxiety Inventory (PDSAI).
Post assessment - week 8 (primary). Score ranging between 0 to 40 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
For people living with Parkinson's Disease, a change in anxiety
Time Frame: Post assessment - week 8 (primary). Score ranging between 0 to 48 (lower score indicates better outcomes).
Change from baseline in anxiety as measured by the Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (PAS).
Post assessment - week 8 (primary). Score ranging between 0 to 48 (lower score indicates better outcomes).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) collected in this study will not be shared to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Tech-CBT intervention

3
Subscribe