Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (UMSC01)

December 4, 2023 updated by: Ever Supreme Bio Technology Co., Ltd.

A Seamless Phase I/IIa Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

This study is to identify the safety and efficacy of repeat IV(Intravenous) and IT(Intrathecal) administrations of UMSC01 in patients with MS. While anti-inflammatory drugs are routinely used for the treatment of MS by inhibiting immune responses, their effects on axon remyelination or neuroregeneration are limited. The combined systemic delivery of UCMSCs via intravenous injection and local administration of the cells by IT was to have safety and therapeutic efficacy for patients with MS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is single arm in Phase I part: 6 patients will be enrolled sequentially for safety considerations. The patient will receive UMSC01 via IV followed by IT at day 28 as described in above. After all patients in Phase I complete the safety assessment by SMC without any major safety issue 4 weeks after the last UMSC01 administration, the Phase IIa part will be initiated. There are 2 arms in Phase IIa part: Sham-controlled with conventional treatment control and administration of UMSC01 with conventional treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

41

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Non-US
      • Taichung, Non-US, Taiwan, 404
        • Recruiting
        • China Medical University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yuh C Guo, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients are willing to sign informed consent.
  2. Male or female are age between 20 to 65 years old on date of consent.
  3. Diagnosis of Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS) (≥1 clinically documented relapse in the past 12 months, ≥2 clinically documented relapses in the last 24 months or ≥ 1 gadolinium enhanced lesion or T2 new lesion in the last 12 months) or Secondary Progressive MS (SPMS) (EDSS increase ≥1.0 point (baseline EDSS ≤ 5.0) or ≥ 0.5 point (baseline EDSS ≥5.5), and ≥1 clinical relapse or ≥1 gadolinium enhanced lesion in the last 12 months)
  4. MS diagnosis established between 2 to 15 years and EDSS score between 2.0 to 6.5 before enrollment
  5. Patient has appropriated blood clotting function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements: PT, APTT ≤ 1.5X upper limit of normal (ULN).
  6. Treatment failure (either ≥ 1 relapse, ≥ 1 new T2 lesion, ≥ one gadolinium enhanced lesion or EDSS deterioration) with at least one of MS disease modifying therapy as Interferon-β, Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), Dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), Teriflunomide (Aubagio), Fingolimod (Gilenya), Ozanimod (Zeposia), Cladribine (Mavenclad), Siponimod (Mayzent), Ofatumumab (Kesimpta), or Natalizumab (Tysabri) for more than 6 months
  7. All male patients and female patients with child-bearing potential (between puberty and 2 years after menopause) should use appropriate contraception method(s) for at least 4 weeks after UMSC01 treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy, lactation, and those who are not pregnant but did not, or unwilling to, take effective contraceptives measures 4 weeks before and after the treatment.
  2. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes (fasting blood glucose > 250 mg/dL)
  3. Patients with inadequate hepatic and renal function: AST and ALT > 5X ULN; eGFR < 30 mL/min.
  4. Patients who are unable to undergo Brain MRI examination for any reason.
  5. Patients who have medical history or current clinically active malignant tumor, peripheral neuropathy, myopathy or other clinically significant neurological diseases that will confound the evaluation of this study.
  6. Patients who have immuno-compromised condition or is with known clinically significantly autoimmune conditions other than MS or is receiving immunosuppressive treatments other than MS treatment within 6 months.
  7. With active infection that required systemic treatment
  8. Patients who are participating in other clinical trials with an investigational product within 1 month.
  9. Patients who were treated with cytotoxic medications during the last 1 month prior to the infusion.
  10. Relapse of MS within1 month before UMSC01 infusion.
  11. With anti-CD20 therapy, such as rituximab
  12. Patients not suitable to participate the trial as judged by the Investigator(s)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: UMSC01
UMSC01 cells mixed with normal saline will be administered to patients after the onset of diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
UMSC01 cells will be IV infusion followed by IT infusion with 12 months of follow up after treatment.
Sham Comparator: Placebo
For IV administration, normal saline will be administered to patients after the onset of diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. For IT administration, sham puncture procedure will partially penetrate without reaching subarachnoid space, and no spinal fluid will be drawn.
Normal saline will be IV infusion followed by sham-IT infusion with 12 months of follow up after treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Endpoint for Phase I portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
SAE, SUSAR, and AE incidences over the study period
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Primary Endpoint for Phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of EDSS to Visit 10
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy endpoint for phase I portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB for EDSS of follow up visits (Visit 6-10)
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoint for phase I portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB for brain MRI parameters of follow-up visits (Visit 6 -10)
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoint for phase I portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Quality of life: CFB for MSQoL-54 questionnaire score of follow-up visits (Visit 6 -10)
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoint for phase I portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of T25FW scores of follow-up visits (Visit 6-10)
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoint for phase I portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of 9-HPT scores of follow-up visits (Visit 6-10)
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoint for phase I portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of PASAT scores of follow-up visits (Visit 6-10)
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoint for phase I portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of SDMT scores of follow-up visits (Visit 6-10)
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoint for phase I portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of RNFL thickness, measured by OCT of follow-up visits (Visit 6-10)
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoint for phase I portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of MSFC of follow-up visits (Visit 6-10)
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoints for phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 6-month follow-up period
Time to onset of CDW confirmed by EDSS at least 6 months
from visit 2 to 6-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoints for phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
ARR (Annualized relapse rate), where relapse is defined as new or worsening neurological symptoms lasting for >24 hours
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoints for phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of follow-up visits (Visit 6 -10) for EDSS
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoints for phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of follow up visits (Visit 6-10) for brain MRI parameters
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoints for phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Quality of life: CFB of follow up visits (Visit 6-10) for MSQoL-54 questionnaire score
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoints for phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of follow up visits (Visit 6-10) for T25FW scores
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoints for phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of follow up visits (Visit 6-10) for 9-HPT scores
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoints for phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of follow up visits (Visit 6-10) for PASAT scores
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoints for phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of follow up visits (Visit 6-10) for SDMT scores
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoints for phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of follow up visits (Visit 6-10) for RNFL thickness, measured by OCT
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Efficacy endpoints for phase IIa portion
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of follow up visits (Visit 6-10) for MSFC
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
The safety endpoints are listed below for both phase I and IIa portions
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
SAE, SUSAR, and AE incidences over the study period
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
The safety endpoints are listed below for both phase I and IIa portions
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of laboratory data to subsequent visits
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
The safety endpoints are listed below for both phase I and IIa portions
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of physical examination to subsequent visits
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
The safety endpoints are listed below for both phase I and IIa portions
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of vital signs to subsequent visits
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
The safety endpoints are listed below for both phase I and IIa portions
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
CFB of AFP, CEA, CA199, SCC, IgA, anti-EBV, β-HCG, CA125, CA153, and PSA to Visit 6 (Phase I) or Visit 10 (Phase IIa)
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The exploratory endpoints are listed below for both phase I and IIa portions
Time Frame: from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period
Immunological markers, including CD3, CD4, CD8 surface markers, IgG, IgM, anti-HLA antibodies and Panel Reactive Antibody Assay in whole blood
from visit 2 to 12-month follow-up period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Woei C Shyu, Ever Supreme Bio Technology Co., Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Allogeneic umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells

3
Subscribe