Manually Controlled Infusion vs Target Controlled Infusion for StrokeThrombectomy (HASTE)

October 9, 2022 updated by: Alessandro De Cassai, University of Padova

Manually Controlled Infusion vs Target Controlled Infusion: an Hemodynamic Alterations in StrokeThrombectomy Evaluation (HASTE); a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare manual general anesthesia induction to general anesthesia induction guided by target controlled infusion system in cerebral ischemic stroke

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does target controlled infusion has a more favorauble hemodynamic profile than manual general anesthesia induction?
  • Do patients receiving general anesthesia with target controlled infusion system have a more favourable outcome? Participants will receive general anesthesia induction with a target controlled infusion system and will be compared to patients receiving manual general anesthesia induction.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

224

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Veneto
      • Padova, Veneto, Italy, 35127
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital of Padova
        • Contact:
          • Alessandro De Cassai, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Anterior Cerebral Circulation Stroke
  • Patient eligible for mechanical trombectomy
  • mRS ≤ 2;
  • Fasting patients (>6 h solid, >2 hours liquids)
  • Glashow Coma Scale more than seven.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient in general anesthesia at hospital arrival
  • Associated hemorrhagic stroke

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Manual induction
General Anesthesia induction: Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, Propofol 2 mg/kg, Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg General Anesthesia mainteneance: Propofol 4-6 mg/kg/h to keep an adequate sedation level (BIS between 40-60; entropy between 40-60)
General anestehsia will be induced and maintained using a pro kilo regimen.
Experimental: Target Controlled Induction

General Anesthesia induction: Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, Propofol TCI with Schneider site effect model starting from 2 mcg/ml and increasing the dose untile loss of consciousness, Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg.

General Anesthesia mainteneance: Propofol TCI with Schneider site effect model in order to keep an adequate sedation level (BIS between 40-60; entropy between 40-60)

General anesthesia will be induced with a TCI pump

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with Intraprocedural Hypotension
Time Frame: Up to three hours
Descrease of mean blood pressure > 20% during the procedure from the baseline
Up to three hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 24 hours after acute ischemic stroke
Time Frame: 24 hours after acute ischemic stroke
Change from baseline in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 24 hours after acute ischemic stroke. The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between a 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that specific ability, while a higher score is indicative of some level of impairment.The individual scores from each item are summed in order to calculate a patient's total NIHSS score. The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0
24 hours after acute ischemic stroke
Change from baseline in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 7 days after acute ischemic stroke
Time Frame: 7 days after acute ischemic stroke
Change from baseline in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 7 days after acute ischemic stroke. The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between a 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that specific ability, while a higher score is indicative of some level of impairment.The individual scores from each item are summed in order to calculate a patient's total NIHSS score. The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0
7 days after acute ischemic stroke
Evaluation of Modified Rankin Scale at 3 months after acute ischemic stroke
Time Frame: 3 months after acute ischemic stroke
Evaluation of Modified Rankin Scale at 3 months after acute ischemic stroke. Modified Rankin Score is a 6 point disability scale with possible scores ranging from 0 to 5. A separate category of 6 is added for patients who expire.
3 months after acute ischemic stroke
Percentage of patients alive at 3 months after acute ischemic stroke
Time Frame: 3 months after acute ischemic stroke
Percentage of patients alive at 3 months after acute ischemic stroke
3 months after acute ischemic stroke
Difference in modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score
Time Frame: 24 hours after ischemic stroke
Successfull reperfusion in the two groups will be evaluated by modified tratment in cerebral infarction score. modified treatment in cerebral infarction is a five point score (0,1,2a,2b,3) with 0 menaning o reperfusion and 3 complete reperfusion
24 hours after ischemic stroke
Difference in time from door to groin
Time Frame: Up to 6 hours
Time will be evaluated from patient admission to the beginning of angiographic procedure
Up to 6 hours
Difference in time from groin to reperfusion
Time Frame: Up to 6 hours
It will be evaluated the overall time of angiographic procedure
Up to 6 hours
Difference in Intensive Care Unit/Stroke Unit stay
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Overall patient stay in intensive care unit/stroke unit in days
Up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 9, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Manual induction

3
Subscribe