Different Catheter Ablation Strategy in Vasovagal Syncope

November 30, 2023 updated by: Yan Yao, MD,PhD, China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Different Catheter Ablation Strategy in Vasovagal Syncope: A Single Center, Prospective, Randomized Study

This study is a prospective, single-center randomized controlled clinical trial. patients with refractory vasovagal syncope were randomly divided into two groups according to the proportion of 1:1. Group A: simple left atrial ganglion plexus ablation (RAGP + LSGP + LLGP + LIGP + RIGP ablation); B group: left atrial ganglion plexus combined with right atrial ganglion plexus ablation (group A + consolidation ablation of RAGP at the junction of right atrial septum and superior vena cava). To clarify the role of RAGP in cardiac autonomic nervous system and the effect of ablation, to establish the standard stragtegy of cardiac nerve ablation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the most common syncope type in clinic, but routine therapy shows no benefits. Cardiac nerve ablation affects the function of cardiovascular system by accurately mapping and ablation of cardiac autonomic ganglion plexus and adjusting cardiac sympathetic-vagal balance. The existing clinical evidence is mostly exploratory or registered clinical studies, and the sample size is small. This study intends to adopt a prospective, randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy of simple left atrial ganglion plexus ablation and left atrial ganglion plexus ablation combined with right atrial ganglion plexus ablation in the treatment of VVS, and to establish the relevant cardiac nerve ablation standards.

This study is a prospective, single-center randomized controlled clinical trial. patients with refractory vasovagal syncope were randomly divided into two groups according to the proportion of 1:1. Group A: simple left atrial ganglion plexus ablation (RAGP + LSGP + LLGP + LIGP + RIGP ablation); B group: left atrial ganglion plexus combined with right atrial ganglion plexus ablation (group A + consolidation ablation of RAGP at the junction of right atrial septum and superior vena cava).

Atrial modeling was established under the guidance of Ensite three-dimensional mapping system, and then MicroPace EPS 320 was used to stimulate and induce the main distribution areas of autonomic ganglia. The high frequency stimulation mode is set as follows: the stimulation frequency is 20 Hz, the voltage is 10 to 20 volts, and the pulse width is 5 milliseconds. The main sites of high frequency stimulation include: the left superior pulmonary vein and the left atrial posterior wall of LSGP, the left inferior pulmonary vein orifice of LIGP, the LLGP, around the right inferior pulmonary vein orifice, the RIGP, around the right superior pulmonary vein and the left atrial junction of the right superior pulmonary vein, the right atrial septum of RAGP, and the superior vena cava junction to stimulate RAGP. Ganglion localization standard: locate the site of vagal response (ventricular arrest, atrioventricular block, RR interval prolongation at least 50%) after high frequency stimulation, and mark it in the three-dimensional model.

Under the guidance of three-dimensional system, the located ganglion plexus was ablated with saline irrigating electrode. The upper limit of power was 40W, the upper limit of temperature was 43 ℃, and the washing rate of saline was 17ml/min. The site of vagal reaction during ablation was defined as the effective ablation site . Denervated interventional therapy. The surgical end point of the treatment was defined as the disappearance of vagal response at the effective ablation site or the ablation of each effective point discharge for at least 30 seconds. Cardiac electrophysiological parameters such as heart rate, AH interval, HV interval, recovery time of sinoatrial node, Wenckebach point of atrioventricular conduction and atrioventricular conduction refractory period were measured before and after ablation.

The patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months respectively after ablation procedure, to observe whether there were recurrent syncope and /or pre-syncope (including the time and frequency of recurrent syncope, inducing factors, and whether complicated with fall injury, etc.), and to reassessed tilt test, 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram and fill in Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Euroqol (EQ-5D) quality of life score form. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac nerve ablation in the prevention of refractory vasovagal syncope. The tilt test, the changes of vagus nerve function and the improvement of quality of life before and after were analyzed and compared. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac nerve ablation strategies, and to explore the role and optimization of RAGP in cardiac nerve ablation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100037
        • China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sign the informed consent form.
  • Definitely diagnosed as vasovagal syncope (according to the 2018 ESC syncope diagnosis and management guidelines).
  • Positive head-up tilt test (cardiac inhibition type, mixed type).
  • Syncope attacks ≥ 3 times in 1 year before operation and/or recurrence of syncope in the last 6 months.
  • More than 2 kinds of routine treatment were ineffective or could not tolerate their side effects.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Syncope caused by other causes.
  • Heart failure (NYHA grade Ⅲ or IV), congenital heart disease, valvular heart disease, deficiency. Bloody heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and myocarditis, chronic. Hepatic and renal insufficiency, diabetes, nervous system diseases, etc.
  • Acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction occurred in recent 6 months; cerebrovascular events occurred in recent 3 months (such as short. Transient ischemic attack, stroke) or other disturbance of cerebral blood supply.
  • Previously undergone cardiac catheter ablation, cardiac surgery and / or permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation.
  • Left atrial thrombus and / or left atrial diameter > 55mm or EF < 35% were found by echocardiography or CT.
  • Pregnancy and lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ablation of left atrial ganglion plexus
In this arm, ablation of GPs will only performed in the left atrium, including ablation of right anterior ganglion plexus (RAGP),left superior ganglion plexus (LSGP),left ganglion plexus (LLGP), left interior ganglion plexus (LIGP) and right interior ganglion plexus(RIGP).
Under the guidance of three-dimensional system, the located ganglion plexus was ablated with saline irrigating electrode. The upper limit of power was 40W, the upper limit of temperature was 43 ℃, and the washing rate of saline was 17ml/min. The site of vagal reaction during ablation was defined as the effective ablation site. The surgical end point of denervated interventional therapy is defined as the disappearance of vagal response at the effective ablation site or the ablation of each effective point discharge for at least 30 seconds.
Experimental: combined ablation of left and right atrial ganglion plexus
In the arm the, ablation of GPs will perform in both atrium, including ablation of right anterior ganglion plexus (RAGP),left superior ganglion plexus (LSGP),left ganglion plexus (LLGP), left interior ganglion plexus (LIGP), right interior ganglion plexus (RIGP), and superior vena cava ganglion plexus (SVCGP). SVCGP were ablated in the right atrium,the left GPs were ablated through the left atrium
Under the guidance of three-dimensional system, the located ganglion plexus was ablated with saline irrigating electrode. The upper limit of power was 40W, the upper limit of temperature was 43 ℃, and the washing rate of saline was 17ml/min. The site of vagal reaction during ablation was defined as the effective ablation site. The surgical end point of denervated interventional therapy is defined as the disappearance of vagal response at the effective ablation site or the ablation of each effective point discharge for at least 30 seconds.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with syncope during follow up
Time Frame: 12 month after ablation procedure
Syncope was defined as a transient loss of consciousness and complete recovery in a very short time. We documented each time that syncope occurred.
12 month after ablation procedure
Number of Participants with pre-syncope during follow up
Time Frame: 12 month after ablation procedure
Pre-syncope was defined as the prodrome before syncope, such as dizziness, sweating, dyspnea, and paleness, and patients did not actually fall down. We documented each time that syncope occurred.
12 month after ablation procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with positive results of head-upright tilt test
Time Frame: 6 month after ablation procedure
the positive results of head-upright tilt test were defined by VASIS standard
6 month after ablation procedure
Number of Participants with positive results of head-upright tilt test
Time Frame: 12 month after ablation procedure
the positive results of head-upright tilt test were defined by VASIS standard
12 month after ablation procedure
changes of deceleration capacity compare to baseline
Time Frame: 3 days after ablation procedure
The deceleration capacity was calculated with the 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram through the phase-rectified signal averaging technique.
3 days after ablation procedure
changes of deceleration capacity compare to baseline
Time Frame: 3 month after ablation procedure
The deceleration capacity was calculated with the 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram through the phase-rectified signal averaging technique.
3 month after ablation procedure
changes of deceleration capacity compare to baseline
Time Frame: 6 month after ablation procedure
The deceleration capacity was calculated with the 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram through the phase-rectified signal averaging technique.
6 month after ablation procedure
changes of deceleration capacity compare to baseline
Time Frame: 9 month after ablation procedure
The deceleration capacity was calculated with the 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram through the phase-rectified signal averaging technique.
9 month after ablation procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Yao yan, PhD, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Syncope, Vasovagal

Clinical Trials on cardiac ganglion plexus ablation(cardioneuroablation)

3
Subscribe