- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05603299
Establishing Clinical Utility Evidence to Support Coverage and Reimbursement for Venn Biosciences' Dawn Test
Establishing Clinical Utility Evidence to Support Coverage and Reimbursement for Venn Biosciences' DawnTM: A CPV® Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
VennBio has developed a pioneering technology, Dawn™, a semi-quantitative assay using ultra-high-pressure-liquid chromatography, quantitative mass spectrometry (MS) that predicts the likelihood of a benefit from pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) or nivolumab (Opdivo®) plus ipilimumab (Yervoy®)), three of the most widely used immune checkpoint inhibitors currently available in the market. The Company's technology is powered by glycoproteomics and artificial intelligence (AI). The AI allows measuring of the glycoproteins and biological makeup of a patient. This combination of technology is meant for physicians to make the best decisions for patient outcomes in immuno-oncology (IO) therapies.
VennBio hopes to make Dawn™'s glycoproteomic solution widely available and is looking to accelerate the adoption of the test in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. To make the test available to more patients, VennBio is looking for established, innovative approaches to gather high-quality prospective clinical utility data quickly. These data will be essential to increase access to the test and to gain coverage and reimbursement.
Accordingly, the proposed study will collect high-quality randomized controlled data from a nationally representative sample of practicing medical oncologists. The primary purposes of this study will be to 1) determine how these physicians currently choose therapy for advanced (i.e., locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic) NSCLC patients, 2) ascertain if introducing the Dawn™ test will improve clinical decision-making, and 3) observe how the educational materials affect physician uptake of the Dawn™ test and treatment of their patients, particularly in assigning immunotherapy (e.g., IO monotherapy vs combination treatment with chemotherapy). Data from this study will investigate the best use case (type of patient) optimally served by Dawn™ testing (and thus the greatest clinical utility) and what physician characteristics (e.g., age, practice setting, training) and practice characteristics (e.g., multi-specialty, private practice, etc.) are associated with these practice changes.
QURE Healthcare is a team of clinicians and researchers that conducts randomized-controlled trials using Clinical Performance and Value (CPV®) patient simulations to generate high-quality clinical utility evidence. CPVs are QURE's scientifically-validated measurement tool, first described in the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) in 2000 and now used in scores of scientific investigations. In this research and derivative peer-reviewed publications, QURE's CPV studies efficiently measure clinical practice patterns among active physicians to determine if there is the value of new technologies to payers.
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Steven D Johnson
- Phone Number: 5108214355
- Email: Steven.Johnson@qurehealthcare.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Board-certified medical oncologists for at least two years
- Averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical and patient care duties over the last six months
- Routinely evaluate patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC in their practice
- Prescribe IO therapies for their advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients
- Practice in either an academic, non-academic, or network hospital setting
- Practicing in the U.S.
- English speaking
- Access to the internet
- Informed, signed, and voluntarily consented to be in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not board-certified in oncology
- Not English speaking
- Not averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical and patient care duties over the last six months
- Not practicing in the U.S.
- No access to the internet
- Did not voluntarily consent to be in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control Group
The Control group treats their simulated patients using standard practice and have no introduction to the new test.
|
|
Experimental: Intervention Group 1 - Test Results Given
Receiving educational materials describing the clinical validation and use cases of a predefined Dawn™ test and is given specific Dawn™ test results in Round 2 of CPV administration, whether they order the test or not.
|
Receive educational materials and sample test results replicating what physicians would receive in the real-world market as they learn about the probability of IO therapy response from the Dawn™ test.
|
Experimental: Intervention Group 2 - Test Results Optional
Receiving educational materials describing the clinical validation and use cases of a predefined Dawn™ test and is given specific Dawn™ test results in Round 2 of CPV administration, only if they choose to order the test.
|
Receive educational materials and sample test results replicating what physicians would receive in the real-world market as they learn about the probability of IO therapy response from the Dawn™ test.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
CPV-measured clinical score difference
Time Frame: [6 months]
|
Pre- and post-difference in the overall and the diagnostic and treatment quality scores between control physicians using standard of care diagnostic tools and intervention physicians using the Dawn™ test.
In each CPV, participants' care recommendations are evaluated against evidence-based care scoring criteria which can sum from 0 to a high potential score of up to 100 percent in each domain, where higher scores mean better outcomes.
The investigators will measure the overall change in the evidence-based physician behavior including physical exam, workup, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer in the CPV patient simulations.
|
[6 months]
|
CPV-measured cost difference
Time Frame: [6 months]
|
Change in cost of related care for patients with lung cancer when comparing the control to the intervention group.
(This cost is modeled in part by measuring differential rates of medical interventions selected by each arm and multiplying by average Medicare reimbursement rates for these interventions.
The cost is also modeled by examining average per annum costs for patients suffering from lung cancer and multiplying by the percent of patients whose workup and interventions for cancer risks are significantly reduced following the intervention.)
|
[6 months]
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
CPV-measured baseline clinical variation levels
Time Frame: [6 months]
|
Participants completing the simulated cases, or CPVs, receive scores based upon the quality of care they provide.
This measure will assess the baseline levels of variation in the care of pain patients among all participants, including by use case types.
The investigators will measure the baseline levels of variation in the assessment, recognition, and management of lung cancer among all participants.
|
[6 months]
|
CPV-measured assessment of use case types
Time Frame: [6 months]
|
The difference in the overall, and the diagnostic and treatment quality scores between control and intervention participants.
Diagnostic and treatment scores are calculated as the percent correct on CPVs, and the overall score is an average score of the subcategory scores (percent correct).
This will be examined for each of the use cases to determine in which case(s) CPV scores most improved.
|
[6 months]
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John W Peabody, MD, PhD, QURE Healthcare
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00062590
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
-
WindMIL TherapeuticsBristol-Myers SquibbTerminatedNSCLC | Lung Cancer | Lung Cancer Metastatic | Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer MetastaticUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoAstraZenecaActive, not recruitingStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Healthy, no Evidence of Disease | Limited Stage Small Cell Lung... and other conditionsUnited States
-
AIO-Studien-gGmbHBristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly and Company; Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; Pfizer; Gilead... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSmall-cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIGermany
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
Alexander ChiNot yet recruitingNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Non-small Cell Carcinoma | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIChina
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruitingStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-small Cell Lung CancerCanada
-
Karen KellyBristol-Myers Squibb; National Cancer Institute (NCI); TransgeneCompletedStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityAstraZenecaRecruitingNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIUnited States
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on Educational Materials on the Dawn test
-
Qure Healthcare, LLCSomaLogic, Inc.CompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Type 2 DiabetesUnited States
-
University of California, DavisCompletedMelanoma | Malignant MelanomaUnited States
-
University of California, DavisCompletedAtopic Dermatitis | Hand Eczema | Atopic Eczema | Infantile EczemaUnited States
-
Qure Healthcare, LLCApplied Proteomics IncCompleted
-
Qure Healthcare, LLCCompletedCardiometabolic SyndromeUnited States
-
Qure Healthcare, LLCCompletedChronic Disease | Medication Adherence | Drug Drug InteractionUnited States
-
Qure Healthcare, LLCActive, not recruitingCardiometabolic SyndromeUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityUniversity of California, BerkeleyCompletedDepression | Breast Cancer | Stress Disorders, Post-traumaticUnited States
-
Capsulomics, Inc.Active, not recruitingEsophageal Cancer | Barrett EsophagusUnited States